本文選題：表見代理　切入點：構(gòu)成要件　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為一項重要的民商法制度，表見代理不僅是代理制度走向成熟的標(biāo)志，更是在衡平被代理人與善意第三人利益的基礎(chǔ)上，促進交易順利完成以實現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟迅速發(fā)展的重要手段。但是，鑒于表見代理將權(quán)利表象視為真實權(quán)利的處置方式，這與常理不符，由此導(dǎo)致理論界與實務(wù)界對表見代理制度的相關(guān)規(guī)則產(chǎn)生了重大分歧。因此，本文將圍繞這些分歧進行綜合分析，，從而能夠?qū)Ρ硪姶碇贫鹊囊?guī)則有個清楚的把握。基于此，本文將從以下幾個方面來深入分析表見代理制度： 第一章：表見代理的制度價值及性質(zhì)。 表見代理作為一項制度，必然有其存在價值，而其價值體現(xiàn)必然受制于相應(yīng)的理論基礎(chǔ)。表見代理的理論基礎(chǔ)也就是在制定表見代理規(guī)則時，立法者所依托的法理基礎(chǔ)，主要包括外觀主義、衡平原則和信賴保護原則。這部分內(nèi)容為表見代理制度的準(zhǔn)確適用打下了牢固的理論基石。 在制度構(gòu)建意義層面上，表見代理不僅維護并增強了代理制度的信用度，填補了代理制度存在的功能性殘缺，而且在衡量被代理人與善意第三人的利益價值時，同時對二者的利益提供了平等的保護機會，最終實現(xiàn)交易秩序的安全與穩(wěn)定，促進經(jīng)濟的高效運行。 對表見代理性質(zhì)的理解，學(xué)者們各執(zhí)一詞，主要歸結(jié)于有權(quán)代理說或狹義無權(quán)代理說。然而，這些觀點都沒有從全面的視角，對表見代理的本質(zhì)作出正確的判定。實際上，表見代理與有權(quán)代理、狹義無權(quán)代理存在根本的區(qū)別，表見代理實質(zhì)為“廣義的無權(quán)代理”，即表見代理的本質(zhì)是被代理人與無權(quán)代理人之間缺乏授予代理權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)，但能產(chǎn)生與有權(quán)代理一樣的法律責(zé)任，這只是法律擬制的結(jié)果。 第二章：表見代理構(gòu)成要件的分析。學(xué)者們對表見代理構(gòu)成要件的理解上，以被代理人的過錯是否為要件之一為爭議點，存在兩種截然不同的觀點，即“單一要件說”和“雙重要件說”，這兩種觀點皆有其可取之處，但也存在各自的弊端。對構(gòu)成要件的認(rèn)定意見上，雖然表見代理仍屬于“雙重要件說”，但是除客觀上存在代理權(quán)表象這一要件以外，應(yīng)將被代理人的過錯要件改為依風(fēng)險原則確定被代理人方面的要件更為全面，將相對第三人的無過失要素歸入善意要件之中更為合理，無需再單獨列出。
[Abstract]:As an important civil and commercial law system, apparent agency is not only a sign of the maturity of the agency system, but also an important means to balance the interests of the principal and the bona fide third party, and to promote the successful completion of the transaction in order to realize the rapid economic development.However, in view of the fact that the apparent agency regards the representation of the right as the way to deal with the real right, this is not in accordance with common sense, which leads to great differences between the theoretical and practical circles on the relevant rules of the apparent agency system.Therefore, this paper will make a comprehensive analysis around these differences, so as to have a clear understanding of the rules of apparent agency system.Based on this, this paper will analyze the surrogate system from the following aspects:Chapter one: the system value and nature of apparent agency.As a system, apparent agency must have its existence value, and its value embodiment is bound to be subject to the corresponding theoretical basis.The theoretical basis of apparent agency is the legal basis which the legislator relies on when making the rule of apparent agency, mainly including the principle of appearance, the principle of balance and the principle of trust protection.This part lays a solid theoretical foundation for the accurate application of apparent agency system.In the sense of system construction, apparent agency not only maintains and strengthens the credit degree of agency system, but also fills the functional defect of agency system, and measures the benefit value of agent and bona fide third party.At the same time, it provides equal protection opportunities for the interests of the two parties, and finally realizes the security and stability of the transaction order and promotes the efficient operation of the economy.On the understanding of the nature of apparent agency, scholars hold their own words, mainly due to the theory of authorized agency or narrow sense of unauthorized agency.However, these views do not make a correct judgment on the nature of apparent agency from a comprehensive perspective.In fact, there is a fundamental difference between the apparent agency and the authorized agent. In the narrow sense, the apparent agency is essentially "the broad sense of the unauthorized agent", that is, the essence of the apparent agency is the lack of the basis for granting the agency power between the principal and the unauthorized agent.But can produce the same legal liability as the right to act, this is only the result of legal fiction.Chapter two: the analysis of the constitution of agency.On the understanding of the constitutive elements of apparent agency, there are two different views on whether the fault of the principal is one of the elements, that is, "the theory of single elements" and "the theory of double elements".Both views have their merits, but they also have their own drawbacks.In the opinion of determining the constituent elements, although the apparent agency still belongs to the "double element theory", except for the fact that there exists the representation of the agency power objectively,It is necessary to change the fault element of the principal agent to that of the principal agent according to the principle of risk, and it is more reasonable to classify the no-fault element of the third party into the bona fide element, and there is no need to list it separately.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 奚曉明;論表見代理[J];中外法學(xué);1996年04期

本文編號：1700852