本文選題：船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：優(yōu)先權(quán)項(xiàng)目　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文從船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)最基本的概念、特征以及設(shè)立目的入手,討論與之相關(guān)的船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的優(yōu)先順位問題。船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)作為海商法中重要的特有制度,其優(yōu)先順位問題在理論和實(shí)踐上都具有極高的研究價(jià)值。 第一章從船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的概念和法律特征入手,進(jìn)而探究船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)制度設(shè)立的目的以及研究船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)優(yōu)先受償順位問題的重要意義,是本篇論文的基礎(chǔ)部分,為后文中對船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的各種優(yōu)先順位問題研究做好鋪墊。 第二章主要研究船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的內(nèi)部受償順位問題。該部分闡述了法律為某些特定海事請求設(shè)置船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的主要原則,并提出了筆者對相關(guān)問題的思考和建議,認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)在我國海商法中引入“航次原則”,對船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)擔(dān)保的各海事請求依航段予以劃分,進(jìn)而具體規(guī)定各船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)擔(dān)保的海事請求的優(yōu)先順位。 第三章研究的主要內(nèi)容是船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)與其他船舶擔(dān)保物權(quán)問的優(yōu)先順位關(guān)系。筆者認(rèn)為我國《海商法》規(guī)定船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)較船舶抵押權(quán)具有更高的優(yōu)先受償順位是合理的,而籠統(tǒng)的規(guī)定船舶留置權(quán)后于船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)得到受償需要再次斟酌,海損事故后、為繼續(xù)航行所必須的修船費(fèi)用請求應(yīng)當(dāng)具有更高的受償順位。 第四章主要研究船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)制度與海事賠償責(zé)任限制制度問的優(yōu)先順位關(guān)系。筆者認(rèn)為,應(yīng)當(dāng)調(diào)整船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)擔(dān)保的限制性債權(quán)在設(shè)置責(zé)任限制基金后的行使方式,并建議對船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)擔(dān)保的非限制性債權(quán)在責(zé)任限制基金分配后的受償方式,通過立法進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步的明確。 第五章討論的是船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)在航運(yùn)企業(yè)破產(chǎn)中的優(yōu)先受償。筆者認(rèn)為船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)基于政策的、公益的原因,對某些特定海事請求進(jìn)行保護(hù),以促進(jìn)航運(yùn)業(yè)的健康有序發(fā)展,區(qū)別于其他破產(chǎn)債權(quán),其在破產(chǎn)程序中就船舶優(yōu)先受償有其充分依據(jù)。 最后本篇論文最后的總結(jié)部分,將對整篇論文的研究作出歸納性結(jié)論,對船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)相關(guān)的各優(yōu)先受償順位問題進(jìn)一步闡述,得出自己的結(jié)論和建議。
[Abstract]:Starting with the most basic concept, characteristics and purpose of establishment of maritime liens, this paper discusses the priority order of maritime liens, which is an important special system in maritime law. The priority sequence problem is of great value in both theory and practice. The first chapter starts with the concept and legal characteristics of maritime lien, and then probes into the purpose of the establishment of maritime lien system and the significance of studying the priority of maritime lien. It is the basic part of this paper. This paper lays the groundwork for the research of priority sequence of maritime liens. The second chapter mainly studies the internal compensation order of maritime liens. This part expounds the main principles of establishing maritime liens for certain specific maritime claims, and puts forward the author's thoughts and suggestions on the related issues. It is considered that "voyage principle" should be introduced into the maritime law of our country, and each maritime claim of maritime lien guarantee should be divided according to the section, and then the priority of maritime claim secured by maritime lien should be specified. The main content of the third chapter is the priority relation between maritime liens and other ship security interests. The author thinks that it is reasonable to stipulate that maritime liens have higher priority order than ship mortgage. But the general stipulation after the ship lien obtains the compensation after the maritime lien needs to consider again, after the average accident, the ship repair expense request which is necessary for the continuation of navigation should have a higher order of compensation. The fourth chapter mainly studies the priority relation between maritime lien system and limitation system of maritime claim liability. The author thinks that the way of exercising restrictive creditor's rights of maritime lien guarantee should be adjusted after the establishment of liability limitation fund. It is also suggested that the way of payment of the unrestricted claims of maritime lien security after the allocation of the liability limitation fund should be further clarified by legislation. The fifth chapter discusses the priority of maritime liens in the bankruptcy of shipping enterprises. The author thinks that maritime liens are based on policy and public good reasons to protect certain specific maritime claims in order to promote the healthy and orderly development of shipping industry. Different from other bankruptcy claims, there is sufficient basis for the prior payment of ships in bankruptcy proceedings. In the last part of this paper, the conclusion of the whole paper is summarized, and the priority priority of maritime liens is further elaborated, and their own conclusions and suggestions are obtained.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張麗英;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)法律性質(zhì)若干學(xué)說析[J];比較法研究;2004年04期

2 左平良;我國一般優(yōu)先權(quán)立法的宏觀思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年04期

3 沈秋明;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)與海事賠償責(zé)任限制[J];法學(xué)雜志;1994年02期

4 邢海寶;;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)研究[J];法學(xué)家;1996年04期

5 李璐玲;;對《海商法》中船舶留置權(quán)界定的反思[J];法學(xué);2009年02期

6 劉sョ，

本文編號(hào)：1699548