本文選題：船舶擔保物權(quán)　切入點：船舶抵押權(quán)　出處：《吉林大學》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 船舶是海上運輸?shù)墓ぞ?作為一種具有特殊功能和用途的物,調(diào)整海上運輸關(guān)系和船舶關(guān)系的海商法需要對以船舶為客體的物權(quán)作出特別規(guī)定,因此,船舶物權(quán)制度作為海商法的基本制度之一,具有十分重要的意義。船舶擔保物權(quán)制度是船舶物權(quán)制度的重要內(nèi)容,我國《海商法》關(guān)于船舶擔保物權(quán)制度的立法雖體現(xiàn)了國際上物權(quán)立法的先進發(fā)展趨勢,但也存在著一定的缺陷。本文從船舶抵押權(quán)、船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)和船舶留置權(quán)三種船舶擔保物權(quán)形式入手,通過對各國海商法律和國際公約的沖突比較,提出解決法律沖突的一些途徑與方法,旨在為進一步完善我國《海商法》中有關(guān)船舶擔保物權(quán)的某些規(guī)定提出理論依據(jù)和具體建議。
[Abstract]:As an object with special functions and uses, the maritime law which adjusts the maritime transport relationship and the ship relationship needs to make special provisions on the real right of the ship as the object. As one of the basic systems of maritime law, ship real right system is of great significance. Although the legislation of maritime law of our country about the real right system of ship security reflects the advanced development trend of international real right legislation, it also has some defects. Through the comparison of the conflicts between the maritime laws and international conventions of various countries, this paper puts forward some ways and methods to resolve the conflicts of law, starting with the three forms of security interest in ships, maritime lien and maritime lien. The purpose of this paper is to put forward theoretical basis and concrete suggestions for the further improvement of some provisions in Maritime Law of China concerning security interests in ships.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 張麗英;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)法律性質(zhì)若干學說析[J];比較法研究;2004年04期

2 申衛(wèi)星;我國優(yōu)先權(quán)制度立法研究[J];法學評論;1997年06期

3 申衛(wèi)星;論優(yōu)先權(quán)同其他擔保物權(quán)之區(qū)別與競合[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2001年03期

4 傅廷忠;;也談海事優(yōu)先權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)[J];中國海商法年刊;1990年00期

5 許俊強;船舶抵押權(quán)若干法律問題研究[J];中國海商法年刊;1998年00期

，

本文編號：1685707