發(fā)布時間：2018-03-29 18:50

  本文選題：民事合法　切入點：犯罪　出處：《政治與法律》2017年12期

【摘要】：利用"合法"民商事手段實施"犯罪"的案件在實踐中屢屢出現(xiàn),如何認定成為難題,這實際上涉及的是刑民實體沖突問題。刑民實體沖突是刑民交叉的下位概念,不同于刑民程序沖突,除了刑民(狹義)沖突還包括刑法和商法的沖突。同一客觀事實,在刑事司法與民商事訴訟中可能得到完全不同的認定,這是刑民實體沖突產(chǎn)生的主要原因。此外,刑法與民法及商法在價值理念、技術(shù)特征、思維方式等方面的差異,也是沖突產(chǎn)生的原因。從刑法理論分析,對于民商法未禁止的行為能否認定為犯罪的回答,涉及"違法一元論"與"違法相對論"的爭議,后者更適合我國刑事司法的理論與實踐。在堅持"違法相對論"前提下,刑事實質(zhì)可以刺破民商事表象。"刑破民"要大膽,"刑破商"要謹慎。
[Abstract]:The case of using "lawful" civil and commercial means to carry out "crime" often appears in practice. How to identify it becomes a difficult problem, which actually involves the problem of entity conflict between criminal and civilian, which is the lower concept of the intersection of criminal and civilian. Different from the conflict of criminal procedure, in addition to the conflict of criminal law (narrow sense), it also includes the conflict of criminal law and commercial law. The same objective fact may be completely different in criminal justice and civil and commercial proceedings. In addition, the differences between criminal law, civil law and commercial law in value concept, technical characteristics, mode of thinking and so on are also the causes of the conflict. The answer to whether an act not prohibited by the Civil and Commercial Law can be regarded as a crime involves the controversy between "illegal monism" and "illegal relativity", which is more suitable for the theory and practice of criminal justice in our country. Criminal essence can pierce the appearance of civil and commercial affairs.
【作者單位】： 同濟大學法學院;
【基金】：2017年國家社科基金項目“信息化條件下特大城市犯罪治理研究”(項目編號:17BFX188)的階段性研究成果
【分類號】：D923;D924.3
，

本文編號：1682388