本文選題：國(guó)際融資租賃　切入點(diǎn)：破產(chǎn)取回權(quán)　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：融資租賃自20世紀(jì)50年代開(kāi)始,席卷了全球西方發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的金融業(yè)。作為現(xiàn)代租賃業(yè)的重要標(biāo)志,其具有諸多獨(dú)特的交易特征。具體到法律領(lǐng)域,這些獨(dú)特的交易特征所帶來(lái)的法律關(guān)系的變化對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的民商法構(gòu)成的挑戰(zhàn)。它突破了傳統(tǒng)民商法關(guān)于所有權(quán)、擔(dān)保、租賃、代理等法律關(guān)系的概念,創(chuàng)設(shè)出一種新型的特殊的法律關(guān)系,與其他金融法律理論相比,國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于國(guó)際融資租賃租賃法律問(wèn)題的研究還尚欠成熟。 本文僅針對(duì)融資租賃中的所有人以取回租賃物的方式對(duì)所有權(quán)的保護(hù)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究。全文共分三大部分:第一章是有關(guān)融資租賃相關(guān)概念的概述,介紹了融資租賃的概念和融資租賃標(biāo)的物的特點(diǎn)及所有權(quán)問(wèn)題用比較的方法分析了融資租賃與所有權(quán)和普通租賃與所有權(quán)的差別,從而指出融資租賃所有權(quán)的特殊性質(zhì)。第二章是本文的核心部分,共分六小節(jié)。第一節(jié)論述了取回權(quán)問(wèn)題的由來(lái)。第二節(jié)取回權(quán)的性質(zhì)問(wèn)題。第三節(jié)中論述了“實(shí)質(zhì)的所有人”,該部分依民法基本原理為據(jù)著重介紹了租賃標(biāo)的物所有人。第四節(jié)介紹取回權(quán)的分類。筆者于本部分論述中大膽地提出不同于以往任何觀點(diǎn),表現(xiàn)在兩方面:有權(quán)取回租賃標(biāo)的物的所有權(quán)人并不僅限于租賃關(guān)系中的出租人,還包含買賣合同下的供貨方;取回租賃物的救濟(jì)方法不限于傳統(tǒng)意義上承租人破產(chǎn)時(shí)出租人的取回權(quán),或稱一般取回權(quán)或破產(chǎn)取回權(quán),還應(yīng)當(dāng)包括出租人破產(chǎn)時(shí),破產(chǎn)管理人的取回權(quán)、承租人根本違約時(shí)出租人取回租賃物的救濟(jì),以及在租賃物交付之前,所有權(quán)尚未轉(zhuǎn)移時(shí)發(fā)生的供貨方取回租賃物的權(quán)利。下面的幾節(jié)談到與取回權(quán)有關(guān)的其他法律問(wèn)題,包括取回權(quán)利行使不能時(shí)的救濟(jì)、取回的方式和程序要求等。第三章是中國(guó)融資租賃取回權(quán)立法現(xiàn)狀與完善。 本文寫(xiě)作的特點(diǎn),始終依據(jù)民法基本原理作基礎(chǔ)貫穿全文,同時(shí)結(jié)合破產(chǎn)法及合同法有關(guān)違約的法律規(guī)定。結(jié)合世界主要國(guó)家的立法優(yōu)點(diǎn)以及《國(guó)際融資租賃公約》中的合理內(nèi)容,針對(duì)中國(guó)的現(xiàn)行融資租賃立法保障所有權(quán)人的利益的實(shí)體和程序法方面提出了一點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:As an important symbol of modern leasing industry, financial leasing has many unique transaction characteristics since 1950s, which has swept the financial industry of western developed countries all over the world. The changes in legal relations brought about by these unique characteristics of transactions pose a challenge to traditional civil and commercial law. It breaks through the traditional concepts of legal relations such as ownership, security, lease, agency, etc. A new kind of special legal relationship has been created. Compared with other financial legal theories, the research on the legal issues of international financial leasing is still immature at home and abroad. This paper focuses on the protection of ownership by the owner of the financial lease by taking back the lease. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first chapter is an overview of the related concepts of financial lease. This paper introduces the concept of financial lease, the characteristics of the subject matter of financial lease and the problem of ownership. The difference between financial lease and ownership and ordinary lease and ownership is analyzed by comparative method. The second chapter is the core part of this paper. It is divided into six sections. The first section discusses the origin of the issue of the right to take back. The second section deals with the nature of the right of return. The third section deals with the "substantial owner", which focuses on the subject matter of lease according to the basic principles of civil law. Section IV introduces the classification of the right to return. There are two aspects: the owner who has the right to take back the subject matter of lease is not limited to the lessor in the lease relationship, but also includes the supplier under the contract of sale and purchase; The remedy for obtaining the lease item is not limited to the lessor's right to take back the lease item in the traditional sense when the lessee goes bankrupt, or the general right to take back or the right to take back from bankruptcy, but should also include the right of the bankruptcy administrator when the lessor goes bankrupt, Relief for the lessor to recover the lease item upon the lessee's fundamental breach of contract, and the right of the supplier to recover the lease item that has not yet been transferred before the delivery of the lease item. The following sections address other legal issues relating to the right of return, The third chapter is about the current situation and perfection of the legislation of the right of recovery of financial leasing in China. The characteristics of this article are always based on the basic principles of civil law. At the same time, it combines the legal provisions of bankruptcy law and contract law on breach of contract, combined with the legislative advantages of major countries in the world and the reasonable contents of the Convention on International Financial Leasing, This paper puts forward some suggestions on the substantive and procedural law of protecting the interests of the owner in the current legislation of financial lease in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：D996

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 曹慧;論國(guó)際融資租賃中的破產(chǎn)取回權(quán)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 管麗;破產(chǎn)法上的取回權(quán)制度探析[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

3 王妍娟;我國(guó)飛機(jī)融資租賃法律制度研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1680687