本文選題：有限責(zé)任公司　切入點(diǎn)：公司僵局　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文的研究?jī)?nèi)容是司法介入公司僵局途徑之一的強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度。伴隨市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的不斷推進(jìn),公司內(nèi)部治理面臨日益復(fù)雜和多元化的矛盾和沖突,公司僵局就是這一系列矛盾和沖突的集中表現(xiàn)形式。有限責(zé)任公司由于其“人合性”和“資合性”的雙重特點(diǎn)更容易滋生和爆發(fā)公司僵局,這也是封閉式公司在全世界范圍內(nèi)面臨的共同難題。公司僵局的危害是顯而易見的。它使公司的內(nèi)部治理陷入僵持狀態(tài),公司的正常運(yùn)營(yíng)停滯,股東的合法權(quán)益無從保障,與公司相關(guān)的利害關(guān)系人面臨利益損失的重大風(fēng)險(xiǎn),因此,尋求破解公司僵局成為商法領(lǐng)域一個(gè)重大而又現(xiàn)實(shí)的命題。我國2005年修訂的《公司法》針對(duì)公司僵局問題進(jìn)行了初步的救濟(jì)制度設(shè)計(jì),應(yīng)該在一些方面有了實(shí)質(zhì)性的突破,但是在完備程度和操作性層面處于起步階段,面對(duì)紛繁復(fù)雜的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況缺乏有效的調(diào)整和明確的指引,公司僵局問題在目前的立法背景下仍然得不到全面的調(diào)整和明確的指引,相關(guān)問題的研究道路依然任重道遠(yuǎn)。 這幾年來,針對(duì)公司僵局問題的研究和探討十分活躍,但基本聚焦于司法強(qiáng)制解散制度上,對(duì)其他救濟(jì)途徑僅有點(diǎn)到為止的分析探討。本文擬就強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度為研究對(duì)象,借鑒國內(nèi)外一系列成熟的法律成果,期望能夠?qū)窘┚值慕鉀Q提供一種可行的思路。 本文主體內(nèi)容分為四個(gè)部分,首先是引言,案例引入。通過引入典型性案例指明目前我國公司法針對(duì)公司僵局問題所存在的法律漏洞,并參照國外經(jīng)典案例提出引入強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的可行性和必要性。 第一部分,股權(quán)強(qiáng)制轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的法律概述。這一部分著眼于強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的基本問題,包括強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的定義、法律性質(zhì)和法理基礎(chǔ),通過對(duì)這些基本問題的闡釋確立強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的基本理論框架,并為下一部分的探討奠定基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分,強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的域外立法。這一部分主要是介紹美國和德國在強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度方面的立法情況,闡明強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)和制度價(jià)值。 第三部分,強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的本土化構(gòu)建。這一部分是文章的主體部分,通過對(duì)強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的法律構(gòu)成要件的分析——包括適用范圍、適用主體、運(yùn)行程序、股權(quán)價(jià)格確定以及制度失效和豁免情況——為我國創(chuàng)設(shè)強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度構(gòu)建起基本的理論架構(gòu),這也是理論探討服務(wù)于現(xiàn)實(shí)實(shí)踐的必然要求。 第四部分,強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度與公司法相關(guān)制度的銜接。在上一章節(jié)分析的基礎(chǔ)上,這一部分主要是分析探討強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度與相關(guān)制度的法律界限和緊密聯(lián)系,包括司法解散制度、異議股東股權(quán)收買請(qǐng)求權(quán)制度、公司債權(quán)人保護(hù)制度、股東人數(shù)制度以及資本維持制度。通過這部分的闡釋,力求在理論層面和操作層面將強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度融入現(xiàn)行公司法的法律體系。
[Abstract]:The research content of this paper is one of the compulsory equity of judicial intervention in corporation deadlock way transfer system. Along with the market economy system reform, corporate governance is facing increasingly complex and diverse contradictions and conflicts, concentrated form of company deadlock is a series of contradictions and conflicts. The limited liability company due to its dual characteristics of "people together" and "capital" is more likely to breed and the outbreak of the company deadlock, which is a common problem facing the company closed type in the world. The harm of corporate deadlock. It is obviously that the internal governance of the company into a stalemate, the normal operation of the company stagnation, the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders can not guarantee parties the relationship between corporation and the serious risks facing the loss of interest, therefore, to seek the company deadlock has become a major commercial law and realistic topic. I < > in 2005 revised company law relief system preliminary design for company deadlock problem, there should be a substantial breakthrough in some aspects, but in the complete degree and the operational level in the initial stage, facing the reality of the complexity of the lack of effective adjustment and clear guidelines, the corporate deadlock in the legislative background the present is still not fully adjusted and clear guidelines on issues related to the road is still a long way to go.
In recent years, the research on the corporate deadlock and discussion is very active, but the basic focus on the judicial dissolution system, on the other remedies only go beyond the analysis. This paper intends to compulsory equity transfer system as the research object, using a series of domestic and foreign mature legal results, expect to be able to solve the deadlock of the company to provide a feasible way.
The main content of this paper is divided into four parts, the first part is introduction, introducing the case. By introducing the typical case that China's company law for corporation deadlock exist loopholes in the law, and put forward the feasibility and necessity of the introduction of compulsory equity transfer system according to the classic case abroad.
The first part, overview of the law compulsory equity transfer system. This part focuses on the basic problems of compulsory equity transfer system, including the definition of compulsory equity transfer system, the legal nature and legal basis, establish the basic theoretical framework of compulsory equity transfer system based on the fundamental issues of interpretation, and lays the foundation for the next part of.
The second part is the extraterritorial legislation of the mandatory share transfer system. This part mainly introduces the legislative situation of the US and Germany in the compulsory equity transfer system, and expounds the realistic basis and institutional value of the mandatory share transfer system.
The third part, establishing compulsory equity transfer system localization. This part is the main part of the article, including the scope of application, through the analysis of the transfer of compulsory equity system of the legal elements of the subject, operation procedures, failure and equity price to determine the system and exemptions for the creation of China's compulsory equity transfer system construction theory the basic structure, which is the inevitable requirement of the practice of the theory of service.
The fourth part, cohesion compulsory equity transfer system related to the company law system. Based on the analysis on the section, this part mainly analyzes the legal limits of compulsory equity transfer system and other related systems and closely related, including the system of judicial dissolution, the dissenting shareholders' equity repurchase right system of company creditor protection system of shareholders. The number of the system and the capital maintenance system. Through this part of the explanation, in the theoretical level and operational level will force the equity transfer system into the existing company law legal system.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 鮑為民;美國法上的公司僵局處理制度及其啟示[J];法商研究;2005年03期

2 陳開梓;;公司僵局的預(yù)防及法律救濟(jì)[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：1607847