本文選題：水路貨物運(yùn)輸　切入點(diǎn)：船期表　出處：《上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院》2001年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 依據(jù)我國(guó)航運(yùn)法律體系，水路貨物運(yùn)輸分為國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸和沿海、內(nèi) 河貨物運(yùn)輸。前者主要受1993年開(kāi)始實(shí)施的《海商法》的調(diào)整，規(guī)范我國(guó)港 口與外國(guó)港口之間的國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸，簡(jiǎn)稱國(guó)際水路貨物運(yùn)輸；后者受《民 法通則》、《合同法》及交通部制定的《國(guó)內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸規(guī)則》等部門規(guī)章的 調(diào)整，，規(guī)范我國(guó)港口之間的水路貨物運(yùn)輸，簡(jiǎn)稱國(guó)內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸。本論文主 要對(duì)水路貨物運(yùn)輸合同中人們關(guān)注的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了探討。 第一章是緒論部分。在介紹了《合同法》的立法背景后，分析了《合同法》 與《海商法》的關(guān)系以及其對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸合同的影響，同時(shí)對(duì)新《兩 規(guī)》的主要特點(diǎn)做了介紹。 第二章是關(guān)于船期表的法律性質(zhì)。該章主要就船期表是要約的觀點(diǎn)提出質(zhì) 疑，指出其法律性質(zhì)應(yīng)為要約邀請(qǐng)，并就此做了論述。 第三章是關(guān)于歸責(zé)原則。該章從歸責(zé)原則的概念入手，分析了《合同法》 確立的嚴(yán)格責(zé)任制，以及嚴(yán)格責(zé)任制對(duì)我國(guó)水路貨物運(yùn)輸法的影響。 第四章是關(guān)于海上貨物留置權(quán)。筆者在對(duì)留置權(quán)的概念及一般法律特征進(jìn) 行闡述后，論述了海上貨物留置權(quán)的幾個(gè)主要問(wèn)題，如對(duì)《海商法》第87條 規(guī)定的“其貨物”的理解，行使海上貨物留置權(quán)應(yīng)注意的問(wèn)題等。 第五章是關(guān)于無(wú)人提貨的問(wèn)題。該章在分析了無(wú)人提貨的概念及性質(zhì)后， 闡述了承運(yùn)人對(duì)無(wú)人提取貨物的權(quán)利：憑單交付責(zé)任的免除權(quán)、對(duì)無(wú)人提取貨 物的留置權(quán)、處置權(quán)和對(duì)托運(yùn)人的請(qǐng)求權(quán)；同時(shí)也闡述了承運(yùn)人對(duì)無(wú)人提取貨 物的義務(wù)：對(duì)貨方的通知義務(wù)和對(duì)無(wú)人提取貨物的合理處置義務(wù)。 第六章是關(guān)于國(guó)內(nèi)水路貨物運(yùn)輸?shù)乃髻r期限。該章主要就1995年《水路 貨物運(yùn)輸規(guī)則》第90條規(guī)定的“180天索賠期限”的立法初衷和法律性質(zhì)進(jìn) 行了分析，指出該期限并非除斥期間，應(yīng)為訴訟時(shí)效；并就其與《海商法》規(guī) 定的“一年”訴訟時(shí)效的沖突做了分析。 圍繞著水路貨物運(yùn)輸合同的上述幾個(gè)問(wèn)題，筆者對(duì)目前存在的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了 評(píng)析，并提出了自己的見(jiàn)解，希望為我國(guó)水路貨物運(yùn)輸法制的完善盡一份綿薄 之力。
[Abstract]:According to our country's shipping law system, waterway cargo transport is divided into international maritime cargo transport and coastal transport. River cargo transport. The former is mainly regulated by the Maritime Law, which came into effect in 1993, and regulates the ports in China. International carriage of goods by sea between a port and a foreign port. General principles of Law, "contract Law" and "rules for the Transport of goods by Water" formulated by the Ministry of Communications and other departmental regulations. To regulate the waterway freight transport between ports in China. This paper discusses several problems that people pay attention to in waterway freight transport contract. The first chapter is the introduction part. After introducing the legislative background of the contract Law, the author analyzes the contract Law. The relationship between Maritime Law and Maritime Law and its influence on China's domestic contract of Carriage of goods by Waterway. The main features of the rules are introduced. The second chapter deals with the legal nature of the schedule of ships. This chapter is mainly concerned with the view that the schedule is an offer. This paper points out that its legal nature should be an invitation to offer. The third chapter is about the principle of imputation. This chapter starts with the concept of imputation principle and analyzes the contract Law. Established strict responsibility system, and strict responsibility system of China's waterway freight transport law. Chapter 4th is about the lien of goods on the sea. The author introduces the concept and general legal characteristics of lien. After expounding, several main problems of lien on goods at sea, such as article 87 of the Maritime Law, are discussed. The definition of "its goods" and the problems to be paid attention to in the exercise of lien of goods at sea. Chapter 5th deals with the problem of unsolicited goods. After analyzing the concept and nature of unsolicited goods, This paper expounds the carrier's right to the unfettered goods: the right of exemption from the liability for delivery of vouchers, and the right of delivery of the goods to no one. Lien, disposition, and claim against the shipper; at the same time, the carrier's claim to the unsolicited goods. Obligations in rem: obligations of notification to parties and reasonable disposal of unfettered goods. Chapter 6th is about the period of claim for domestic waterway freight transportation. Legislative intent and legal nature of the "180-day claim period" set out in article 90 of the rules governing the carriage of goods. It is pointed out that the time limit is not a period of exclusion, but a limitation period of action; and in connection with the provisions of the Maritime Code, it is also pointed out that this period is not a period of exclusion. The conflict of the fixed "one year" statute of limitations is analyzed. On the basis of the above problems in the contract of carriage of goods by waterway, the author has carried on the opinion that exists at present. This paper analyzes and puts forward his own opinion, hoping to do a little for the perfection of the legal system of waterway freight transportation in our country. Power.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2001
【分類號(hào)】：D996

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 查瑞鋒;目的港無(wú)人提貨法律問(wèn)題研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1603405