本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法院地法 涉外物權(quán) 法律適用 物之所在地法　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：涉外物權(quán)的法律適用，自古以來都是學(xué)者們關(guān)注的焦點。但從14世紀(jì)薩維尼提出有關(guān)涉外物權(quán)的沖突規(guī)范至今，無論是理論學(xué)說還是立法實踐都很少有人直接提出適用法院地法的主張。這并不意味著我們能忽視這種實際存在的現(xiàn)象。如果仔細分析便知，在涉外物權(quán)的法律適用中，雖沒有直接適用法院地法的相關(guān)規(guī)定，它卻總是能夠獲得適用。沈涓教授把這一現(xiàn)象稱之為：法院地法在物權(quán)關(guān)系中的隱性適用。本文在整理各方面資料的基礎(chǔ)上，分析法院地法在涉外物權(quán)關(guān)系中的適用情況，歸納其適用的原因，，總結(jié)其發(fā)展趨勢，最后結(jié)合我國相關(guān)法律對法院地法在我國涉外物權(quán)領(lǐng)域的適用情況進行分析，找出存在的問題并提出解決思路。 文章分為四個部分，合計三萬余字。 第一部分是分析法院地法與涉外物權(quán)的法律適用。本部分分別從法院地法與不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用、法院地法與動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用兩個方面來進行分析。對于不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用，從“物之所在地法”提出至今，似乎并沒有什么太大改變。法院地法看似與不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用并沒有太大關(guān)系，但由于法律選擇規(guī)則和管轄權(quán)選擇規(guī)則的的雙重作用，使得法院地法往往能夠得到隱性適用。相比較不動產(chǎn)，動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用就要復(fù)雜的多。本文將動產(chǎn)分為了一般動產(chǎn)和特殊動產(chǎn)兩類，分別對它們的法律適用情況進行分析。與不動產(chǎn)相同的是，這一部分也是從法律選擇規(guī)則和管轄權(quán)選擇規(guī)則的雙重作用下來分析法院地法在動產(chǎn)物權(quán)中的適用情況。 第二部分是法院地法在涉外物權(quán)中適用的歸因。法院地法能夠在涉外物權(quán)中得到適用，除了第一部分所提到的沖突規(guī)范和管轄權(quán)規(guī)則的雙重作用之外，還體現(xiàn)在物本身的特殊性還有國家主權(quán)利益的驅(qū)使。而法院地法的救濟作用也是我們不能忽視的因素。 第三部分是法院地法在涉外物權(quán)領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展趨勢。時代發(fā)展，社會進步，舊有的觀點和理論也在不斷的推陳出新。涉外物權(quán)領(lǐng)域中物之所在地法原則的松動、“分割法”的采用，以及最密切聯(lián)系原則和意思自治原則的引入，都對物權(quán)的法律適用問題帶來了很大的影響。甚至還包括法院地法的發(fā)展趨勢。這些變化都影響著法院地法在涉外物權(quán)中的適用情況。通過分析，其發(fā)展趨勢也就不言而喻了。 第四部分是法院地法在我國涉外物權(quán)領(lǐng)域適用的分析及反思。本部分從《中華人民共和國涉外關(guān)系法律適用法》出發(fā)，結(jié)合《民法通則》、《物權(quán)法》、《民事訴訟法》、《海商法》等相關(guān)法律，對法院地法在我國涉外物權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的適用情況進行分析，并且指出這種現(xiàn)象的不合理之處以及在今后的立法中該如何做。
[Abstract]:The application of foreign real right law has been the focus of scholars' attention since ancient times. But since 14th century Savini put forward the conflict norm concerning foreign real right. No matter in theory or in legislative practice, few people put forward the idea of applying the law of the forum directly. This does not mean that we can ignore the actual existence of this phenomenon. If we analyze it carefully, we can see that in the application of the law concerning foreign real right, Although there is no direct application of the relevant provisions of the law of the forum, it can always be applied. Professor Shen Quan calls this phenomenon the implicit application of the law of the forum in the real right relationship. This paper analyzes the application of the forum law in the foreign real right relationship, sums up the reasons for its application, summarizes its development trend, and finally analyzes the application of the forum law in the field of foreign real right in our country in combination with the relevant laws of our country. Find out the existing problems and put forward solutions. The article is divided into four parts, totaling more than 30,000 words. The first part is to analyze the application of the law of the forum law and the real right concerning foreign affairs. This paper analyzes the application of the law of the forum and the real property right of movable property from the point of view of "the law of the place of the property", so far as the application of the law of the real property right is concerned. It seems that nothing has changed much. The law of the forum does not seem to have much to do with the application of the law of real property, but because of the dual role of the rules of choice of law and the rules of choice of jurisdiction, Compared with immovable property, the legal application of movable property is much more complicated. In this paper, chattel is divided into two types: general movable property and special movable property. This part also analyzes the application of forum law in movable property right from the dual function of the rules of choice of law and the rule of choice of jurisdiction. The second part is the attribution of the application of the forum law in the foreign real right. The forum law can be applied in the foreign real right, except for the dual function of the conflict norm and the jurisdiction rule mentioned in the first part. It is also reflected in the particularity of the material itself and the drive of the sovereign interests of the state, and the relief function of the law of the forum is also a factor that we can not ignore. The third part is the development trend of the forum law in the field of foreign real right. The old views and theories are constantly emerging from the past. The loosening of the principle of location law in the field of foreign real rights, the adoption of the "division method," and the introduction of the principle of the closest connection and the principle of autonomy of will, Both of them have a great influence on the application of the law of real right. Even the development trend of the law of the forum is also included. These changes affect the application of the law of the forum in the real right involving foreign affairs. Through the analysis, the development trend of the law is self-evident. Part 4th is the analysis and reflection of the application of the forum law in the field of foreign real right in China. This part starts from the Law of the people's Republic of China on the Application of the Law concerning Foreign Relations. Combined with the relevant laws such as General principles of Civil Law, Real right Law, Civil procedure Law and Maritime Law, this paper analyzes the application of the forum law in the field of foreign real right in China. It also points out the unreasonableness of this phenomenon and how to do it in the future legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D997.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 屈廣清,周后春;論物權(quán)法律適用的分割制[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年01期

2 陳衛(wèi)佐;;日本國際私法的最新改革[J];法律適用;2009年02期

3 陳衛(wèi)佐;;涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法的中國特色[J];法律適用;2011年11期

4 孫建;;論我國國際私法法律適用的確定性與靈活性[J];法學(xué)評論;2012年02期

5 杜煥芳;;論我國涉外物權(quán)法律適用的完善[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年02期

6 周后春;;當(dāng)代物權(quán)沖突法之新發(fā)展[J];河北法學(xué);2012年05期

7 周后春;;論物權(quán)法的任意性及其對物權(quán)法律適用的影響[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2006年03期

8 呂巖峰;;物權(quán)法律沖突與物之所在地法原則的適用[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

9 呂巖峰;;論國際物權(quán)關(guān)系的適當(dāng)法——物之所在地法原則之理析[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年01期

10 顏宏輝;;國際私法適用與限制外國法的本位論[J];河南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

本文編號：1541336