發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-19 21:39

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 適航 謹(jǐn)慎處理 ISM規(guī)則 海上保險(xiǎn)　出處：《上海海事大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本論文以船舶的適航性為研究對(duì)象，首先從航運(yùn)歷史發(fā)展的角度上分析了船舶適航的內(nèi)容，在航海技術(shù)規(guī)范的層面上概括了國(guó)內(nèi)外司法實(shí)踐中適航內(nèi)容的要素及存在的差異。然后，分別在海上貨運(yùn)、海上保險(xiǎn)、ISM規(guī)則等方面分析了有關(guān)船舶適航性的熱點(diǎn)問題，每一節(jié)都留有筆者用于平衡各方利益的觀點(diǎn)。最后，針對(duì)前述領(lǐng)域中存在的各種問題，分別在海事司法實(shí)踐和海事立法的角度上，提出了大量的有利于當(dāng)前階段合理分?jǐn)偤Ｉ巷L(fēng)險(xiǎn)的適航觀點(diǎn)和建議。 全文共分為三大部分。第一章為船舶適航內(nèi)容分析，從航運(yùn)界和學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)船舶適航性的理解入手，簡(jiǎn)要介紹了船舶適航性的發(fā)展歷史，大膽預(yù)測(cè)當(dāng)前正處于“趨向于絕對(duì)適航階段”，然后重點(diǎn)在船體適航、船員適航、載貨處所適航這三個(gè)方面，結(jié)合1974 SOLAS、STCW 78／95、ISM規(guī)則等國(guó)際公約及大量海事海商案例，分析了國(guó)際和國(guó)內(nèi)在適航內(nèi)容方面的主要差異，歸納出能夠代表當(dāng)前適航階段的適航要素，為下文分析適航責(zé)任打好了技術(shù)性基礎(chǔ)。 第二章為船舶適航責(zé)任分析，本章以船舶適航責(zé)任為主線，以第一章的技術(shù)性資料為依據(jù)，重點(diǎn)分析了涵蓋海上貨運(yùn)、海上保險(xiǎn)、ISM規(guī)則等方面有關(guān)船舶適航性的熱點(diǎn)問題：“開航前”與“開航當(dāng)時(shí)”的界定、“謹(jǐn)慎處理”的把握、保證船舶適航等，這些看似陳舊的話題，在《漢堡規(guī)則》、ISM規(guī)則、ISPS規(guī)則所引領(lǐng)的新的絕對(duì)適航階段，其內(nèi)容都要產(chǎn)生實(shí)質(zhì)性的變化。筆者對(duì)每個(gè)熱點(diǎn)問題都闡述了能平衡各方利益、具有實(shí)踐操作性的觀點(diǎn)，為指導(dǎo)下文的司法實(shí)踐埋下了伏筆。 第三章為有關(guān)船舶適航性的司法實(shí)踐，繼第二章中的熱點(diǎn)問題，本章不僅在實(shí)體法的合理適用，而且在訴訟程序上較為深刻地提出了大量的有利于當(dāng)前階段恰當(dāng)分?jǐn)偤Ｉ线m航風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的建議。其中，在海事訴訟方面，要引入特殊的舉證程序；在判定承運(yùn)人／被保險(xiǎn)人的適航責(zé)任上，要采取謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度；在海商法的修改方面，要加入許多有關(guān)適航性的規(guī)定。實(shí)際上，這些觀點(diǎn)和建議，，可以全部作為海商實(shí)體法和程序法方面的立法建議。當(dāng)然了，船舶的適航性是一個(gè)發(fā)展的概念，需聯(lián)系航海和航運(yùn)實(shí)務(wù)知識(shí)，用發(fā)展的觀點(diǎn)來(lái)分析其內(nèi)涵。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the seaworthiness of ships as the research object. Firstly, the contents of ship seaworthiness are analyzed from the point of view of the historical development of shipping. This paper summarizes the elements and differences of seaworthiness in the judicial practice at home and abroad on the level of maritime technical specification. Then, it analyzes the hot issues related to ship seaworthiness in the aspects of marine freight, marine insurance and ISM code, respectively. Each section contains the author's point of view for balancing the interests of all parties. Finally, in view of the various problems in the above-mentioned fields, they are respectively from the point of view of maritime judicial practice and maritime legislation. A large number of seaworthy views and suggestions are put forward which are conducive to the reasonable allocation of marine risks at present stage. The thesis is divided into three parts. The first chapter analyzes the content of ship seaworthiness, starting with the understanding of ship seaworthiness in shipping and academic circles, and briefly introduces the history of ship seaworthiness. Boldly predict that the current situation is "towards the stage of absolute seaworthiness," and then focus on the three aspects of hull airworthiness, crew airworthiness, and airworthiness at cargo carriers, combined with international conventions such as the 1974 SOLASN STCW 78 / 95 ISM Code and a large number of maritime cases. This paper analyzes the main differences in the content of airworthiness between the international and domestic countries, sums up the airworthiness elements which can represent the current airworthiness stage, and lays a good technical foundation for the following analysis of seaworthiness responsibility. The second chapter is the ship seaworthiness responsibility analysis, this chapter takes the ship seaworthiness responsibility as the main line, takes the first chapter technical data as the basis, has emphatically analyzed covers the sea freight, The hot issues concerning the seaworthiness of ships in marine insurance and ISM regulations include the definition of "before sailing" and "at the time of sailing", the assurance of "careful handling", the assurance of seaworthiness, and so on. These seemingly obsolete topics, In the new absolute seaworthiness stage led by the ISM Code and ISPS Code, the contents of the Hamburg Code should be substantially changed. The author expounds the viewpoint that each hot issue can balance the interests of all parties and has practical maneuverability. In order to guide the following judicial practice buried the foreshadowing. The third chapter is about the judicial practice of ship seaworthiness. Following the hot issues in Chapter II, this chapter is not only applicable to the reasonable application of substantive law. Moreover, a large number of suggestions are put forward in the litigation procedure which are conducive to the appropriate allocation of seaworthiness risk at present stage, among which, in maritime litigation, a special procedure of proof should be introduced. Take a cautious approach in determining the carrier / insured's seaworthiness responsibilities; in the amendment of maritime law, a number of provisions on seaworthiness should be added. In fact, these views and suggestions, Of course, the seaworthiness of ships is a concept of development, which needs to be combined with the practical knowledge of navigation and shipping, and use the viewpoint of development to analyze its connotation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;D996.19

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李佳;廢除共同海損制度以后的法律構(gòu)建[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

2 彭俊芳;海上保險(xiǎn)中的船舶適航問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

3 閔曉涵;論《鹿特丹規(guī)則》下適航義務(wù)及對(duì)我國(guó)《海商法》影響[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1518050