認(rèn)真對(duì)待民法總則中的公共利益
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-07-24 20:06
【摘要】:公共利益,是得以限制民事主體自由的足夠充分且正當(dāng)?shù)睦碛?屬于民法的核心范疇之一。我國(guó)既有的民事法律傳統(tǒng),認(rèn)可公共利益的存在,而且認(rèn)可公共利益得區(qū)分為社會(huì)公共利益與國(guó)家利益,《中華人民共和國(guó)民法總則》秉承了這一民事法律傳統(tǒng)。遵循民法價(jià)值判斷問題的實(shí)體性論證規(guī)則,主張?jiān)谔囟ㄇ樾蜗麓嬖诠怖娴挠懻撜?應(yīng)承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的論證責(zé)任?梢孕惺箛(guó)家公權(quán)力對(duì)公共利益進(jìn)行類型化的機(jī)關(guān),應(yīng)當(dāng)慎重行使該項(xiàng)權(quán)力,不得動(dòng)輒以維護(hù)公共利益為由,限制或者否定民事主體的自由。
[Abstract]:Public interest is a sufficient and legitimate reason to limit the freedom of civil subject, which belongs to one of the core categories of civil law. The existing civil legal tradition of our country recognizes the existence of public interest, and the recognition of public interest can be divided into social public interest and national interest. The General provisions of Civil Law of the people's Republic of China adheres to this civil legal tradition. Following the substantive argumentation rules of the value judgment of civil law, the discussants who have public interests under specific circumstances should bear the corresponding argumentation responsibility. Organs that can exercise state public power to type the public interest shall exercise this power cautiously and shall not restrict or negate the freedom of the civil subject on the ground of safeguarding the public interest.
【作者單位】: 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)民商事法律科學(xué)研究中心;中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院法學(xué)院;
【基金】:國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“民法典編纂重大疑難問題研究”(14ZDC017)成果
【分類號(hào)】:D923
本文編號(hào):2518839
[Abstract]:Public interest is a sufficient and legitimate reason to limit the freedom of civil subject, which belongs to one of the core categories of civil law. The existing civil legal tradition of our country recognizes the existence of public interest, and the recognition of public interest can be divided into social public interest and national interest. The General provisions of Civil Law of the people's Republic of China adheres to this civil legal tradition. Following the substantive argumentation rules of the value judgment of civil law, the discussants who have public interests under specific circumstances should bear the corresponding argumentation responsibility. Organs that can exercise state public power to type the public interest shall exercise this power cautiously and shall not restrict or negate the freedom of the civil subject on the ground of safeguarding the public interest.
【作者單位】: 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)民商事法律科學(xué)研究中心;中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院法學(xué)院;
【基金】:國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“民法典編纂重大疑難問題研究”(14ZDC017)成果
【分類號(hào)】:D923
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 杜娟娟;;淺析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法與公共利益[J];職業(yè)圈;2007年01期
2 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 丁延齡;社會(huì)公共利益的法理學(xué)探析[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年
,本文編號(hào):2518839
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2518839.html
最近更新
教材專著