【摘要】：我國(guó)《著作權(quán)法》第三次修改中新增了追續(xù)權(quán)條款。為了完善我國(guó)追續(xù)權(quán)立法設(shè)計(jì),有必要回溯早期追續(xù)權(quán)立法。早期的追續(xù)權(quán)立法主要采用單行法的形式對(duì)追續(xù)權(quán)進(jìn)行規(guī)定,不同國(guó)家在追續(xù)權(quán)具體制度設(shè)計(jì)上存在較大差異,在立法設(shè)計(jì)上并未充分考慮制度的可操作性,但早期追續(xù)權(quán)制度確定了追續(xù)權(quán)的基本架構(gòu)。早期追續(xù)權(quán)立法對(duì)于我國(guó)具有積極的借鑒意義,作為《伯爾尼公約》成員國(guó),我國(guó)應(yīng)遵守公約的規(guī)定,在外國(guó)作者適用追續(xù)權(quán)上采用互惠原則。我國(guó)在追續(xù)權(quán)立法設(shè)計(jì)上應(yīng)充分考慮制度的可操作性,采用轉(zhuǎn)售總額為追續(xù)金計(jì)量基礎(chǔ),并將私人交易排除出追續(xù)權(quán)的適用范圍,在追續(xù)權(quán)的運(yùn)行上采用著作權(quán)集體管理模式,以保障追續(xù)權(quán)的運(yùn)行效率。
[Abstract]:The right of pursuit clause has been added to the third revision of the copyright Law of our country. In order to perfect the legislative design of the right of pursuit in our country, it is necessary to go back to the legislation of the right of pursuit in the early stage. The early legislation of the right of pursuit mainly uses the form of single-line law to regulate the right of pursuit. There are great differences in the specific system design of the right of pursuit in different countries, and the maneuverability of the system has not been fully considered in the legislative design, but the basic structure of the right of pursuit has been determined by the system of the right of pursuit in the early stage. The legislation of early right of pursuit has positive reference significance for our country. As a member of the Berne Convention, our country should abide by the provisions of the Convention and adopt the principle of reciprocity in the application of the right of pursuit by foreign authors. In the legislative design of the right of pursuit, we should fully consider the maneuverability of the system, adopt the total amount of resale as the basis of the measurement of the right of recovery, exclude the applicable scope of the right of recovery from the private transaction, and adopt the mode of collective management of copyright in the operation of the right of pursuit in order to ensure the efficiency of the operation of the right of recovery.
【作者單位】： �？怂�-馬賽大學(xué);華東政法大學(xué);
【基金】：法國(guó)埃菲爾政府獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金項(xiàng)目(N°870735J)階段性成果 華東政法大學(xué)優(yōu)秀學(xué)位論文培育項(xiàng)目“追續(xù)權(quán)制度的創(chuàng)設(shè)研究”(HDZF2016-1-002)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王祥君;;美國(guó)消費(fèi)金融創(chuàng)新制度對(duì)我國(guó)消費(fèi)制度立法設(shè)計(jì)的啟示[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年07期

2 胡開忠;許福忠;陳大林;;我國(guó)權(quán)利管理電子信息制度的立法設(shè)計(jì)[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2005年02期

3 晏宗武;論《合同法》先期違約制度的立法設(shè)計(jì)[J];皖西學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

4 張學(xué)軍;;生育自決權(quán)研究[J];江海學(xué)刊;2011年05期

5 蘇麗娜;;我國(guó)離婚扶養(yǎng)制度的立法現(xiàn)狀分析[J];人民論壇;2013年02期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉歡;論體系化視角下商事權(quán)利的立法設(shè)計(jì)[D];湖南大學(xué);2013年

2 田娣;我國(guó)孤兒作品使用制度的構(gòu)建[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2509894