【摘要】：商標(biāo)侵權(quán)的民事訴訟中,被控侵權(quán)人提出注冊商標(biāo)無效進(jìn)行抗辯時,法院因無權(quán)直接對注冊商標(biāo)效力做出判決,導(dǎo)致糾紛解決程序復(fù)雜,效率低下。借鑒國外的相關(guān)制度,在現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)則內(nèi),法院應(yīng)積極審查當(dāng)事人提出的注冊商標(biāo)無效抗辯事由是否成立,并在此基礎(chǔ)上繼續(xù)對侵權(quán)糾紛審理判決。
[Abstract]:In the civil proceedings of trademark infringement, when the alleged infringer defends the invalidity of the registered trademark, the court has no right to directly judge the validity of the registered trademark, which leads to the complexity of the dispute resolution procedure and the inefficiency. Drawing lessons from the relevant systems of foreign countries, in the existing legal rules, the court should actively examine whether the invalid defense of registered trademark put forward by the parties is established, and on this basis, continue to judge the infringement disputes.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué);
【分類號】：D923.43
，

本文編號：2489973