【摘要】：在知識經(jīng)濟時代,傳統(tǒng)的擔(dān)保方式己經(jīng)不能滿足市場的龐大需求,而知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資則開始發(fā)揮越來越重要的作用。其中,商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押作為一種金融創(chuàng)新與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)相結(jié)合的新型融資手段,能有效促進企業(yè)的商標(biāo)權(quán)進行資本化運作,對解決企業(yè)融資難問題具有深遠的意義。然而,商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資本身結(jié)構(gòu)復(fù)雜,涉及的交易主體眾多,法律關(guān)系錯綜復(fù)雜,且我國尚處于商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的起步階段,在實踐過程中相關(guān)風(fēng)險日益突顯,很多法律風(fēng)險問題還沒有從根本上得到解決,尤其商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資還在發(fā)展的上升期,后續(xù)償還貸款期間潛在法律風(fēng)險也不能忽視。所以本文在分析商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資過程中可能存在的各種法律風(fēng)險、現(xiàn)行風(fēng)險防范機制狀況的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒國外的立法和實踐經(jīng)驗,總結(jié)國內(nèi)試點地區(qū)的成功經(jīng)驗,嘗試提出新的更優(yōu)化建議。本文研究的主要目的是在分析商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資法律風(fēng)險的基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建系統(tǒng)的法律風(fēng)險防范機制,以期對我國商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的發(fā)展有所裨益。本文除引言和結(jié)語外,共分為四部分進行具體論述。第一部分:論述了商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押的概念、標(biāo)的范圍、質(zhì)押類型和法律關(guān)系。同時,詳細地論述我國商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押業(yè)務(wù)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r與存在的風(fēng)險,尋找與剖析阻礙我國商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資發(fā)展的根本原因。第二部分:論述我國商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押法律風(fēng)險防范機制的現(xiàn)狀和問題,主要分析并比較了典型試點地區(qū)的質(zhì)押模式和法律風(fēng)險的防范措施。第三部分:論述了典型國家商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押的法律制度,主要對美國、日本、德國的商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押法律規(guī)定進行了比較分析,得出其他國家的商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度對我國的啟示。第四部分:完善我國商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押法律風(fēng)險防范的思考。通過多方參與分擔(dān)商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押的法律風(fēng)險,促進商標(biāo)權(quán)實現(xiàn)途徑的多元化、加強對商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資貸后法律監(jiān)管、完善商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資法律風(fēng)險的事后解決機制。
[Abstract]:In the era of knowledge economy, the traditional way of guarantee can not meet the huge demand of the market, and the pledge financing of intellectual property rights begins to play a more and more important role. Among them, the pledge of trademark right, as a new financing means combining financial innovation and intellectual property rights, can effectively promote the capitalization of the trademark right of enterprises, and has far-reaching significance to solve the problem of financing difficulties of enterprises. However, the structure of trademark pledge financing itself is complex, involving a large number of transaction subjects, legal relations are complex, and our country is still in the initial stage of trademark pledge financing, in the process of practice related risks become increasingly prominent. Many legal risks have not been fundamentally solved, especially in the rising period of trademark pledge financing, and the potential legal risks during the subsequent repayment of loans cannot be ignored. Therefore, on the basis of analyzing the legal risks that may exist in the process of trademark pledge financing and the status of the current risk prevention mechanism, this paper draws lessons from the legislation and practical experience of foreign countries, and summarizes the successful experiences of domestic pilot areas. Try to put forward new and more optimized suggestions. The main purpose of this paper is to construct a systematic legal risk prevention mechanism on the basis of analyzing the legal risk of trademark pledge financing in order to benefit the development of trademark pledge financing in China. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts for specific discussion. The first part discusses the concept of trademark pledge, the scope of subject matter, the type of pledge and the legal relationship. At the same time, the development and risk of trademark pledge business in China are discussed in detail, and the basic reasons of hindering the development of trademark pledge financing in our country are found and analyzed. The second part discusses the current situation and problems of the legal risk prevention mechanism of trademark pledge in our country, and mainly analyzes and compares the mode of pledge and the preventive measures of legal risk in typical pilot areas. The third part discusses the legal system of trademark pledge in typical countries, mainly compares and analyzes the legal provisions of trademark pledge in the United States, Japan and Germany, and draws the enlightenment of other countries' trademark pledge system to our country. The fourth part: perfect our country trademark right pledge legal risk prevention ponder. Through the participation of many parties in sharing the legal risk of trademark pledge, promoting the diversification of ways to realize trademark right, strengthening the legal supervision over the financing of trademark right pledge, and perfecting the mechanism of solving the legal risk of trademark pledge financing after the event.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 南星恒;杜巧云;趙辰;;供給側(cè)改革下知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資風(fēng)險防范路徑[J];財會通訊;2016年32期

2 尹亭;王學(xué)武;;全球科創(chuàng)中心建設(shè)視角下的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款:一個類政策傳導(dǎo)工具的解釋框架[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2016年11期

3 李瑞;楊波;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資:廣東模式、經(jīng)驗與思考[J];時代金融;2016年30期

4 孔曉春;;商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資價值及主體實證分析[J];北京印刷學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年05期

5 盧周信;蘇熳娜;;中小企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資法律風(fēng)險及對策初探[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(漢文哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年10期

6 鮑新中;王言;霍歡歡;樊瑞煒;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資風(fēng)險動態(tài)監(jiān)控平臺構(gòu)建與實現(xiàn)[J];科技管理研究;2016年20期

7 曾莉;王明;;美日科技型中小企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的經(jīng)驗及啟示[J];中國注冊會計師;2016年10期

8 馬毅;李遲芳;左小明;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)集群互助擔(dān)保的信用評價體系和方法[J];科技管理研究;2016年19期

9 王立軍;范國強;;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)金融發(fā)展模式研究綜述[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2016年19期

10 梁丹丹;馬一可;;科技型中小企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款風(fēng)險評估的實證分析[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟與科技;2016年18期

，

本文編號：2469000