地理標志類證明商標正當使用的研究
[Abstract]:In the judicial practice of our country, it is often similar to that of the common registered trademark in determining the proper use of the certification trademark of geographical indications. However, because the geographical indication certification trademark is different from the ordinary registered trademark, when determining the proper use of the geographical indication type proof trademark, the collective right attribute of the geographical indication type proof trademark should be proved. From the point of view of the low significance, high commercial value and weak ability of consumers to identify the trademark of geographical indications, combined with the legislation and judicial practice of our country and outside China, the geographical indication certification trademark is of low significance, high commercial value, and the weak ability of consumers to identify geographical indication certification trademark. Whether the actor has established subjective goodwill or not, and whether the goods of the actor are derived from the geographical area within which the trademark is permitted to be used in the category of geographical indications, Whether the perpetrator uses geographical indications to certify the trademark unintentionally within the necessary scope of describing the product in accordance with the requirements of the laws and regulations, and whether the behavior of the perpetrator will lead to confusion among consumers. Whether the reputation of the geographical indication certification trademark and the popularity of the geographical indication certification trademark are used to determine whether the behavior of the geographical indication type proof trademark is properly used or not is comprehensively identified. Under the protection system of "two-track system" for geographical indications in our country, when there is a conflict between the right of geographical indication type proof trademark and geographical indication products, we should pay more attention to discussing the legitimacy of the behavior of the doer when using the related signs. In order to achieve the balance of interests of all parties. In view of this, in order to improve the system of proper use of geographical indication certification trademark, we should, according to the nature of geographical indication certification trademark, under the existing trademark law system, While making special provisions on the proper use of geographical indications, according to the right characteristics of geographical indications, the status quo of the laws and regulations governing the protection of geographical indications in China, Draw lessons from the experience of foreign law, construct a unified special law on the protection of geographical indications.
【學位授予單位】:浙江大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D923.43
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 林廣海;李德軍;;自行使用侵權(quán)標識包裝商品并銷售屬于疊加式侵權(quán)[J];人民司法;2015年24期
2 李春芳;李淇;;商標性使用的判定[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年08期
3 孟祥娟;李曉波;;地理標志保護制度存在的問題其解決[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年07期
4 蘇志甫;;樓盤名稱商標侵權(quán)行為與正當使用的司法認定 以“小悅城”案為例[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年07期
5 祝建軍;;判定商標侵權(quán)應(yīng)以成立“商標性使用”為前提——蘋果公司商標案引發(fā)的思考[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年01期
6 何懷文;;“商標性使用”的法律效力[J];浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版);2014年02期
7 凌斌;;經(jīng)濟運行的法律影響——論法律界權(quán)在科斯框架中的功能與成本[J];清華大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年03期
8 聶振華;關(guān)曉海;;對姓名商標的敘述性使用不構(gòu)成侵權(quán)[J];人民司法;2011年20期
9 周俊強;;商標合理使用:理論探賾與我國制度建構(gòu)[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2011年03期
10 王弈通;;論地理標志權(quán)的性質(zhì)[J];行政與法;2011年02期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 李明陽;論地理標志證明商標的合理使用[D];西南政法大學;2011年
,本文編號:2460571
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2460571.html