計算機軟件著作權侵權行為的認定
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-29 08:14
【摘要】：隨著高科技的快速發(fā)展，尤其是計算機軟件技術的不斷進步，軟件的功能越來越多，越來越超越人們的想象，并伴隨著互聯網的發(fā)展改變了現代社會人類的生活。計算機軟件代表了信息時代的主要特征，在生活方面，它給人們帶來了各種新的娛樂方式和信息溝通方式，不斷創(chuàng)造豐富的精神產品；在工作方面，它強大的信息處理能力和無紙化辦公等徹底改變了人們的工作方式，提高了工作效率。不僅如此，計算機軟件產業(yè)每年能為社會創(chuàng)造非�？捎^的經濟效益，其在一個國家的各個行業(yè)都發(fā)揮著舉足輕重的作用。這使得計算機軟件侵權行為發(fā)生的越來越普遍，侵權形式各式各樣。軟件侵權活動的猖獗首先損害了軟件開發(fā)商的利益，進而打擊了其不斷創(chuàng)新軟件技術的積極性，最終軟件產業(yè)發(fā)展低迷，損害的還是整個社會的利益。因此，為了在法律上更好的保護計算機軟件權益不受侵犯，如何認定計算機軟件侵權行為便成為法律人士爭相探討的一個主要問題。 世界上大多數國家包括我國都是以著作權法來保護計算機軟件作品的，著作權法一開始就是為保護文學、藝術等文字作品而制定的，但是計算機軟件是最近幾十年才逐漸發(fā)展起來的，，和傳統(tǒng)作品有著很大的不同。因此本文首先從軟件作品和侵權行為所具有的特殊性出發(fā)，探討了軟件著作權侵權行為認定的標準，最后筆者在已有理論的基礎上提出了自己對侵權行為認定的一些看法。下面就簡單介紹一下： 軟件作品本身既有具有一般作品的性質，也具有很多不同于一般作品的特殊性質，這些決定了對軟件作品的侵權行為在一定程度上不同于一般作品的侵權行為。軟件作品在著作權上有很多權利受到保護，在實際發(fā)生的軟件侵權案例中，涉及到最多的和侵權認定比較復雜的行為是對軟件作品的復制和修改的行為，這也是本文主要研究的方面。我國在立法上并沒有詳細的規(guī)定軟件著作權侵權行為的認定方法和具體步驟。筆者從普遍到具體、一般到特殊的角度，分析了認定軟件著作權侵權行為時需要始終遵守的總原則和不同的具體標準，又針對軟件侵權中存在的反向工程和最終用戶侵權兩個特殊問題進行了另外討論。在著作權法上，思想與表達相區(qū)分原則被普遍適用于軟件作品，當然軟件作品也分為思想與表達，但是其表達的形式有文字部分和非文字部分兩種，還有在文字部分上也與一般作品有很大的區(qū)別。軟件作品的這些特別之處使得在適用“抽象概括法”和“實質性相似加接觸”原則等不同的認定標準時，要考慮到具體實施細節(jié)方面的不同方面，以確保正確適用法律。這兩種標準目的都是為了認定侵權行為，在認定過程中第一個步驟都是要先排除軟件作品的思想，而“抽象概括法”可以更好的劃分思想和表達，“實質性相似加接觸”原則可以更好的具體對比兩個軟件中的表達，認定是否侵權。這兩個標準不是獨立的關系，具有一定的交叉關系，而且將它們綜合運用可以取其所長，能夠更好的認定侵權行為。在軟件侵權中又有很多特殊問題需要特殊認定處理，以反向工程和最終用戶侵權為例，不僅要考慮侵犯軟件過程中的復制行為和行為的商業(yè)性質等因素，而且還要根據著作權法上的“思想與表達相區(qū)分原則”和“利益平衡原則”分析我國相關立法和如何認定此種情況下的侵權行為。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of high technology, especially the progress of computer software technology, the function of the software is becoming more and more, more and more than people's imagination, and the development of the Internet has changed the life of the modern society. Computer software represents the main characteristics of the information age, and in the aspect of life, it brings various new forms of entertainment and information communication to people, and constantly creates rich spiritual products; in the aspect of work, Its powerful information processing ability and paperless office change the way people work, and improve the working efficiency. Moreover, the computer software industry can create considerable economic benefits for society every year, and it plays a very important role in every industry in a country. This makes the infringement of computer software more and more widespread, and the forms of infringement are various. The rampant software infringement activity first damages the interests of the software developer, and further the enthusiasm of the software development technology, and finally the development of the software industry is weak, the damage is also the benefit of the whole society. Therefore, in order to protect the computer software's rights and interests without infringement in the law, how to determine the infringement of the computer software becomes a major problem that the law people are scrambling to explore. Most of the countries in the world include the copyright law to protect the computer software works, the beginning of the copyright law is to protect the works of literature, art and so on, but the computer software has developed gradually in recent decades There's a lot of difference between traditional and traditional works. In the same way, from the particularity of the software work and the tort, this paper discusses the standard of the software copyright infringement, and finally, on the basis of the existing theory, the author puts forward some views on the infringement. Act. Here's a simple introduction. The software work itself has the nature of the general works, and it also has a lot of special properties which are different from the general works, which determines the infringement of the software works to a certain extent different from the invasion of the general works The right behavior. The software works have a lot of rights in the copyright. In the case of the actual software infringement, the more complex behaviors involved in the infringement of the software are the behavior of the copying and modification of the software works, which is also the main research in this paper. In our country, there are no detailed methods and tools for the determination of the copyright infringement of the software in the legislation. The author analyses the general principle and the different specific standards which need to be always followed in the infringement of software copyright, and the two special problems of the reverse engineering and the end-user's infringement in the software infringement are also discussed. In the copyright law, the principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression is universally applicable to the software works. Of course, the software works are divided into the thought and the expression, but the expression form has both the character part and the non-text part, and the text part also has a great deal with the general work The difference between the software works makes it possible to take into account the different aspects of the specific implementation details in the application of different criteria such as the "abstract generalization method" and "substantial similarity and contact" principles to ensure proper fit In order to identify the infringement, the first step in the determination process is to first rule out the idea of the software work, and the "abstract generalization method" can better divide the thought and expression. The "substantial similarity and contact" principle can compare the expression of the two software more specifically, and the recognition is that No infringement. The two standards are not independent, have a certain cross-relation, and their comprehensive application can be taken as the director, and the invasion can be better recognized. The right behavior. There are many special problems in the software infringement. Special identification processing is required. In order to take the case of reverse engineering and end-user infringement as an example, it is not only to consider the commercial nature of the copying behavior and behavior during the software infringement Factors such as the "The principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression" and "principle of interest balance" of the copyright law should be analyzed to analyze the relevant legislation in China and how to determine the invasion in this situation
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41
本文編號：2449330
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of high technology, especially the progress of computer software technology, the function of the software is becoming more and more, more and more than people's imagination, and the development of the Internet has changed the life of the modern society. Computer software represents the main characteristics of the information age, and in the aspect of life, it brings various new forms of entertainment and information communication to people, and constantly creates rich spiritual products; in the aspect of work, Its powerful information processing ability and paperless office change the way people work, and improve the working efficiency. Moreover, the computer software industry can create considerable economic benefits for society every year, and it plays a very important role in every industry in a country. This makes the infringement of computer software more and more widespread, and the forms of infringement are various. The rampant software infringement activity first damages the interests of the software developer, and further the enthusiasm of the software development technology, and finally the development of the software industry is weak, the damage is also the benefit of the whole society. Therefore, in order to protect the computer software's rights and interests without infringement in the law, how to determine the infringement of the computer software becomes a major problem that the law people are scrambling to explore. Most of the countries in the world include the copyright law to protect the computer software works, the beginning of the copyright law is to protect the works of literature, art and so on, but the computer software has developed gradually in recent decades There's a lot of difference between traditional and traditional works. In the same way, from the particularity of the software work and the tort, this paper discusses the standard of the software copyright infringement, and finally, on the basis of the existing theory, the author puts forward some views on the infringement. Act. Here's a simple introduction. The software work itself has the nature of the general works, and it also has a lot of special properties which are different from the general works, which determines the infringement of the software works to a certain extent different from the invasion of the general works The right behavior. The software works have a lot of rights in the copyright. In the case of the actual software infringement, the more complex behaviors involved in the infringement of the software are the behavior of the copying and modification of the software works, which is also the main research in this paper. In our country, there are no detailed methods and tools for the determination of the copyright infringement of the software in the legislation. The author analyses the general principle and the different specific standards which need to be always followed in the infringement of software copyright, and the two special problems of the reverse engineering and the end-user's infringement in the software infringement are also discussed. In the copyright law, the principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression is universally applicable to the software works. Of course, the software works are divided into the thought and the expression, but the expression form has both the character part and the non-text part, and the text part also has a great deal with the general work The difference between the software works makes it possible to take into account the different aspects of the specific implementation details in the application of different criteria such as the "abstract generalization method" and "substantial similarity and contact" principles to ensure proper fit In order to identify the infringement, the first step in the determination process is to first rule out the idea of the software work, and the "abstract generalization method" can better divide the thought and expression. The "substantial similarity and contact" principle can compare the expression of the two software more specifically, and the recognition is that No infringement. The two standards are not independent, have a certain cross-relation, and their comprehensive application can be taken as the director, and the invasion can be better recognized. The right behavior. There are many special problems in the software infringement. Special identification processing is required. In order to take the case of reverse engineering and end-user infringement as an example, it is not only to consider the commercial nature of the copying behavior and behavior during the software infringement Factors such as the "The principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression" and "principle of interest balance" of the copyright law should be analyzed to analyze the relevant legislation in China and how to determine the invasion in this situation
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 徐昱春;;計算機軟件著作權侵權行為認定[J];北京工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2007年02期
2 游閩鍵;最終用戶侵權判決第一案的法律思考[J];電子知識產權;2003年02期
3 壽步;;創(chuàng)意不應受到版權保護[J];電子知識產權;2007年10期
4 孫海龍;姚建軍;;知識產權民事審判中事實問題與法律問題辨析[J];電子知識產權;2007年11期
5 董峰君;;從“微軟侵犯字體著作權案”看國產計算機軟件知識產權的保護[J];法制與社會;2010年24期
6 田園;李帥;;知識產權侵權法保護方法評析[J];法制與社會;2011年07期
7 呂炳斌;計算機軟件著作權保護和盜版問題研究[J];科技與法律;2002年03期
8 江波;張金平;;知識產權司法鑒定相關問題研究[J];科技與法律;2009年05期
9 張振亮,盛大銓;關于我國計算機軟件法律保護的若干思考[J];南京郵電學院學報(社會科學版);2000年02期
10 李國泉;壽仲良;董文濤;;實質性相似加接觸的侵權標準判斷[J];人民司法;2010年16期
本文編號：2449330
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2449330.html
