【摘要】：無(wú)論是奉行“財(cái)產(chǎn)價(jià)值觀”的英美法系還是堅(jiān)持“人格價(jià)值觀”的大陸法系國(guó)家,都對(duì)著作權(quán)人身權(quán)的重視程度越來(lái)越高,對(duì)于著作人身權(quán)保護(hù)的立法也日臻完善。著作人身權(quán)的保護(hù)遠(yuǎn)比著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)要復(fù)雜的多,因?yàn)樗P(guān)乎作者的精神權(quán)利、人身利益、體現(xiàn)作者的思想感情、人格意志,同時(shí)肩負(fù)著保護(hù)作者權(quán)益與促進(jìn)文化事業(yè)的發(fā)展雙重重任。其中對(duì)于作者生前著作人身權(quán)的保護(hù)問(wèn)題,理論界和實(shí)踐中都有比較系統(tǒng)的研究,但是對(duì)于作者死后著作人身權(quán)的保護(hù)問(wèn)題,學(xué)術(shù)界甚少討論。筆者認(rèn)為保護(hù)已故作者著作人身權(quán)問(wèn)題有其重要的理論價(jià)值和實(shí)踐意義。本文對(duì)已故作者著作人身權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題提出一些淺見,希望對(duì)已故作者人身權(quán)保護(hù)有所助益。本文除引言和結(jié)束語(yǔ)之外,共分為四部分:第一部分主要討論作者死后對(duì)著作人身權(quán)的影響并提出問(wèn)題,作者死后對(duì)作者的主體地位、權(quán)利歸屬以及著作人身權(quán)的行使與保護(hù)都帶來(lái)一定的影響。第二部分主要討論保護(hù)已故作者著作人身權(quán)的原因和權(quán)利歸屬問(wèn)題。保護(hù)已故作者的著作人身權(quán)原因是作者的著作人身權(quán)能夠突破民法權(quán)利能力樊籬,不因作者死亡而消滅的原因,并且對(duì)其保護(hù)有其重要的社會(huì)意義;通過(guò)對(duì)比“一元論”和“二元論”國(guó)家已故作者著作人身權(quán)的權(quán)利歸屬和保護(hù)期限,明確著作人身權(quán)不能繼承,所謂著作人身權(quán)的“繼承”實(shí)則“保護(hù)”。第三部分主要講述已故作者著作人身權(quán)的行使,分別探討已故作者的發(fā)表權(quán)、署名權(quán)和保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的行使問(wèn)題。第四部分講述已故作者著作人身權(quán)的民事保護(hù)問(wèn)題,分別討論訴前行為保全、停止侵害、賠禮道歉和精神損害賠償在已故作者人身權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題上的適用。
[Abstract]:Both the Anglo-American law system which pursues the "property values" and the civil law countries which adhere to the "personality values" have paid more and more attention to the copyright owner's personal rights, and the legislation on the protection of the copyright's personal rights has also become more and more perfect. The protection of personal rights of works is much more complex than that of property rights of works, because it concerns the author's spiritual rights, personal interests, reflects the author's thoughts and feelings, personality will, At the same time, shoulder the double responsibility of protecting the author's rights and promoting the development of cultural cause. There is a systematic study on the protection of the author's personal right in both theory and practice. However, there is little discussion in the academic circles about the protection of the author's personal right in postmortem works. The author believes that the protection of the personal rights of the deceased author has important theoretical value and practical significance. This paper puts forward some opinions on the protection of the personal right of the deceased author, hoping to be helpful to the protection of the personal right of the deceased author. In addition to the preface and concluding remarks, this paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly discusses the influence of the author on the author's personal right after death and puts forward the question, the author's main position to the author after the death, The ownership of the right and the exercise and protection of the personal right of the author have brought certain influence. The second part mainly discusses the reasons for protecting the personal right of the deceased author and the attribution of the right. The reason of protecting the personal right of the deceased author is that the personal right of the author can break through the barriers of the right of civil law and not be eliminated because of the death of the author, and it is of great social significance to the protection of the personal right of the author. By comparing "monism" and "dualism", it is clear that the author's personal right cannot be inherited, and the so-called "inheriting" principle "protects" the author's personal right in the state of "monism" and "dualism". The third part mainly talks about the exercise of the personal right of the deceased author, and discusses separately the exercise of the deceased author's right of publication, signature and protection of the integrity of the work. The fourth part deals with the civil protection of the personal right of the deceased author, discussing separately the application of the preservation of the act before action, the cessation of the infringement, the apology and the compensation for moral damage in the protection of the personal right of the deceased author.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 李錫鶴;;侵權(quán)行為究竟侵害了什么?——權(quán)利外“法益”概念質(zhì)疑[J];東方法學(xué);2011年02期

2 董炳和;論死者名譽(yù)的法律保護(hù)[J];煙臺(tái)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年02期

3 李國(guó)慶;;論遺作發(fā)表權(quán)——從張愛(ài)玲作品《小團(tuán)圓》說(shuō)起[J];中國(guó)版權(quán);2011年01期

4 李莉;;論作者精神權(quán)利的雙重性[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年03期

5 衣慶云;;對(duì)發(fā)表權(quán)諸問(wèn)題的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王文樂(lè);著作人身權(quán)保護(hù)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2444809