【摘要】：隨著機動車交易市場的迅猛發(fā)展，交易中出現(xiàn)的問題也越來越復(fù)雜，完善機動車物權(quán)變動的法律規(guī)制是一個迫切的問題。而機動車物權(quán)變動與機動車登記是息息相關(guān)的，對登記與物權(quán)變動兩者的關(guān)系進行研究，不僅能為解決理論界的爭議提供參考，促進機動車物權(quán)立法的完善，而且還具有明晰機動車登記效力與機動車權(quán)利歸屬等司法實踐上的意義。本文立足于我國立法，結(jié)合實際中機動車管理與交易的特點，運用比較分析、理論聯(lián)系實際的方法，對機動車登記與物權(quán)變動這個問題的理解提出了自己的建議。 本文總共分了四個部分對這個論題予以論述。 第一部分是機動車物權(quán)變動概述。這個部分簡要介紹了機動車物權(quán)變動的內(nèi)涵，包括機動車概念、類型、什么是機動車物權(quán)變動以及我國現(xiàn)行的法律規(guī)定，主要是《物權(quán)法》的規(guī)定。該部分主要是對機動車物權(quán)變動的一個整體把握，，并引出登記與之權(quán)利歸屬密不可分的關(guān)系。 第二部分是機動車登記的法律界定。這個部分對機動車登記的內(nèi)容、性質(zhì)與功能作了詳細的介紹。機動車登記主要有注冊登記、變更登記、轉(zhuǎn)移登記、抵押登記、注銷登記、質(zhì)押登記。機動車登記具有行政法與民法的雙重性質(zhì)，在生活中既有助于管理交通，也有維護交易安全的作用。該部分指出機動車登記與物權(quán)變動的問題，就是如何看待機動車登記效力的問題，為下文論述作出鋪墊。 第三部分是本文的重點，深入分析機動車登記效力的問題。首先，對登記生效主義的學(xué)說作出了評析，通過利弊分析指出，在我國，機動車物權(quán)變動不適合登記生效主義。其次，對合意生效+登記對抗主義的學(xué)說作出了評析。指出此模式有一定優(yōu)勢，但不能適用于機動車物權(quán)變動所有場合。最后，在對有關(guān)機動車登記效力的學(xué)說爭議進行分析評價后，得出我國適用的理論。即機動車物權(quán)變動采用的是混合模式的結(jié)論，具體為合意生效+登記對抗模式與交付生效+登記對抗模式，前者適用于機動車的抵押權(quán)設(shè)立，后者適用與機動車所有權(quán)變動等領(lǐng)域。并在此基礎(chǔ)上對登記與交付的關(guān)系，善意第三人范圍的問題展開了分析。 第四部分是有關(guān)機動車登記的其他問題。一是未登記的機動車所有權(quán)變動的法律適用問題，即未注冊登記的機動車與注冊登記的機動車應(yīng)該區(qū)別對待。二是機動車登記與交通事故損害賠償責(zé)任問題，即在我國的登記對抗主義模式下，嚴格區(qū)分所有人與實際侵權(quán)人的責(zé)任。對立法上存在的一些問題提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the motor vehicle trading market, the problems in the transaction are becoming more and more complex. It is an urgent problem to perfect the legal regulation of the real right change of motor vehicles. The change of real rights of motor vehicles is closely related to the registration of motor vehicles. The research on the relationship between the registration and the change of real rights can not only provide a reference for the settlement of disputes in theorists, but also promote the perfection of the legislation on real rights of motor vehicles. But also has the clear motor vehicle registration effect and the motor vehicle right attribution and so on the judicial practice significance. Based on the legislation of our country, combined with the characteristics of motor vehicle management and transaction in practice, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the understanding of motor vehicle registration and real right change by means of comparative analysis and the combination of theory and practice. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the topic. The first part is a summary of the real right changes of motor vehicles. This part briefly introduces the connotation of the change of the real right of motor vehicle, including the concept and type of motor vehicle, what is the change of the real right of motor vehicle and the current legal provisions of our country, mainly the provisions of the property Law. This part is a whole grasp of the change of motor vehicle real right, and leads to the inseparable relationship between registration and the ownership of the right. The second part is the legal definition of motor vehicle registration. This part makes a detailed introduction to the content, nature and function of motor vehicle registration. Motor vehicle registration mainly includes registration, change registration, transfer registration, mortgage registration, cancellation registration, pledge registration. Motor vehicle registration has the dual nature of administrative law and civil law. It not only helps to manage traffic in life, but also plays a role in maintaining transaction safety. This part points out the problem of motor vehicle registration and the change of real right, that is, how to treat the effect of motor vehicle registration, which lays the groundwork for the following discussion. The third part is the focus of this paper, in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of motor vehicle registration. First of all, the author makes a comment on the theory of registration effectivist, and points out that in our country, the change of motor vehicle real right is not suitable for registered effectivist theory through the analysis of its pros and cons. Secondly, a comment is made on the doctrine of adversarial doctrine of consensual entry into force. It is pointed out that this model has some advantages, but it can not be applied to all situations of real right change of motor vehicles. Finally, after analyzing and evaluating the theory disputes about the effectiveness of motor vehicle registration, the applicable theory of our country is obtained. That is to say, the change of the real right of the motor vehicle adopts the conclusion of the mixed mode, specifically the mode of consenting to the effective registration countermeasure mode and the delivery effective registration countermeasure mode, the former is suitable for the establishment of the mortgage of the motor vehicle. The latter applies to motor vehicle ownership changes and other areas. On this basis, it analyzes the relationship between registration and delivery, the scope of bona fide third party. The fourth part is about other problems of motor vehicle registration. The first is the legal application of the change of ownership of unregistered motor vehicles, that is, unregistered motor vehicles and registered motor vehicles should be treated differently. The second is the issue of motor vehicle registration and liability for damages in traffic accidents, that is, under the mode of registration antagonism in our country, the liability of owner and actual infringer is strictly distinguished. Some suggestions are put forward to improve the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程嘯;尹飛;;論物權(quán)法中占有的權(quán)利推定規(guī)則[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期

2 劉書正;張東;董健;任建通;;道路交通事故中“機動車所有人”的確定[J];法制與社會;2008年22期

3 李智,李鳳章;登記生效主義和登記對抗主義的比較考察[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年06期

4 陳實;李曉暉;;機動車登記中的物權(quán)保護問題探析[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期

5 葉梅;乙增武;;動產(chǎn)占有與登記的效力沖突及解決[J];中國檢察官;2010年04期

6 趙鳴;論物權(quán)變動模式的選擇[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2002年03期

7 王榮珍;;論物權(quán)變動未登記不得對抗之善意第三人范圍[J];太平洋學(xué)報;2009年05期

8 張卓梅;陳文舉;;債權(quán)相對性的突破與保留[J];人民論壇;2011年32期

9 向逢春;;質(zhì)疑我國物權(quán)法中的二元公示主義[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期

10 金松華;董麗霞;;一物二賣的法律責(zé)任分析[J];中國校外教育;2009年S1期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 汪瑩;我國機動車登記制度研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

2 曹海生;我國機動車交易物權(quán)變動研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：2433163