【摘要】：一如兩百年前一樣,人們似乎依舊習(xí)慣于仰仗國(guó)家來(lái)統(tǒng)籌整理法律,并借助綜合性法典來(lái)展現(xiàn)法律。文章將探討這種信賴在法典編纂中的合理性。文章著力論證,在信息化時(shí)代,法典編纂的法律信息供給功能可以借由比依賴國(guó)家創(chuàng)設(shè)法律體系更好的方式予以實(shí)現(xiàn)。信息化社會(huì)使得法律淵源具有多元性,并賦予了市民選擇法律來(lái)經(jīng)營(yíng)生活的可能性。從傳統(tǒng)來(lái)說(shuō),大陸法系以及普通法系國(guó)家在編纂法典以實(shí)現(xiàn)法律信息的系統(tǒng)化供給方面的經(jīng)驗(yàn)表明,這些法典化活動(dòng)能夠滿足當(dāng)時(shí)的法律信息管理需要,但是傳統(tǒng)的法律編纂方式卻難以應(yīng)對(duì)信息化社會(huì)的挑戰(zhàn)。這促使法律需要以不同的姿態(tài)面向大眾——在國(guó)家編纂法典或法律科學(xué)的形式之外,借助多元的可供受眾選擇的法律信息管理模式。
[Abstract]:As two hundred years ago, people still seem accustomed to relying on the state to co-ordinate their laws and use comprehensive codes to show them. The article will discuss the reasonableness of this trust in codification. The article argues that in the information age, the legal information supply function of codification can be realized in a better way than relying on the country to create a legal system. Information society makes the source of law pluralistic and gives citizens the possibility of choosing law to manage their life. Traditionally, the experience of civil law and common law countries in codifying legal information to achieve a systematic supply of legal information shows that these codification activities can meet the needs of legal information management at the time. However, the traditional way of law compilation is difficult to meet the challenge of information society. This prompts the law to face the public in a different manner-in addition to the national codification or the form of legal science, with the help of a plurality of alternative modes of legal information management for the audience.
【作者單位】： 荷蘭馬斯特里赫特大學(xué)歐洲私法研究中心;芬蘭赫爾辛基大學(xué)比較法研究中心;荷蘭皇家藝術(shù)與科學(xué)院;荷蘭馬斯特里赫特大學(xué)法學(xué)院;荷蘭共同法研究學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家建設(shè)高水平大學(xué)公派研究生項(xiàng)目,留金發(fā)[2013]3009號(hào)
【分類號(hào)】：D913

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 趙震江;法律與信息[J];科技與法律;1998年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2390153