分時度假中的消費者權利保護研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-14 12:07
【摘要】：分時度假是一種在國外發(fā)展迅速但在國內卻屢陷困境的新型交易安排,其涉及主體較多,存續(xù)期限較長,蘊含風險較大。由于我國分時度假市場并不發(fā)達,對其的研究也多集中在域外法的介紹和引進方面,從解釋論角度實證地對其展開的分析并不多見,這對于法律的適用而言是一種缺陷。本文在簡單介紹分時度假的起源和發(fā)展之后,對作為本文研究對象的分時度假進行了界定。為更具現實性,本文的研究建立在對實踐中大量案例整理的基礎上。通過對分時度假中消費者權利主要內容的提取和性質的分析,對實踐中出現的主要問題作出了有針對性的探討,并指出了目前我國法律制度在分時度假方面存在的不足,在此基礎上,文章最后對其更好的發(fā)展提出了立法論上的建議。在此框架之下,文章共分為五個部分。第一部分在梳理分時度假發(fā)展歷程之后,對國內外關于分時度假的界定進行了考察,重點分析了歐盟、英國、德國和美國的立法例,在此基礎上對分時度假作出了較為寬廣的界定。為便于深入展開研究,并對本文的研究對象進行了限定。第二部分在對實踐中的案例進行整理的基礎上,對分時度假交易安排下消費者權利的主要內容進行了提取,在此基礎上對分時度假中消費者所取得權利的性質作出了不同于前人的分析,堅定的認為該權利屬性為債權而非物權。第三部分通過對案例的整理,總結出分時度假中與消費者權利有關的糾紛的主要類型,主要包括與權利取得有關的糾紛、與權利內容有關的糾紛、與權利行使有關的糾紛以及與權利消滅有關的糾紛。針對這些糾紛類型,文章分別進行了兩個層面的分析,其一是對現有司法解決方案的總結,其二是作者本人的觀點。由于消費者撤回權在分時度假中有極為重要的作用,而我國關于消費者撤回權的規(guī)定卻無法在此予以適用,文章對此進行了分析。由于在目前的法律制度框架內對分時度假糾紛的解決顯得極為不效率,本文第四部分針對此缺陷,有針對性的提出了相應的立法建議,主要包括信息披露制度的構建、消費者撤回權制度的完善、合同內容規(guī)制的加強以及相關配套制度的建設。期望能夠通過此種立法改進促使分時度假更健康的發(fā)展。文章最后一部分對全文的內容進行了總結,認為我們應當在法律的穩(wěn)定性和不斷發(fā)展之間找到平衡點,通過審慎而理性的分析和構建,促進制度的完善和分時度假的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Timeshare is a new type of transaction arrangement which develops rapidly in foreign countries but often falls into difficulties in our country. It involves more subjects, has a longer life span and contains a great deal of risks. As the market of timeshare is not developed in China, the research on it is mainly focused on the introduction and introduction of extraterritorial laws. The empirical analysis of timeshare is rare from the angle of explanation, which is a defect to the application of law. After a brief introduction of the origin and development of timeshare, this paper defines timeshare as the object of this paper. In order to be more realistic, this study is based on the consolidation of a large number of cases in practice. Based on the analysis of the main content and nature of consumer rights in time-sharing holidays, this paper makes a targeted discussion on the main problems in practice, and points out the deficiencies in the current legal system of time-sharing holidays in China. On this basis, the article finally put forward some legislative suggestions for its better development. Under this framework, the article is divided into five parts. The first part reviews the definition of timeshare at home and abroad after combing the development of timeshare, focusing on the European Union, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States legislation. On this basis, a broad definition of timeshare is made. In order to carry out the research in depth, the research object of this paper is limited. In the second part, on the basis of sorting out the cases in practice, the main contents of the consumer rights under the arrangement of timeshare transaction are extracted. On this basis, the author makes a different analysis of the nature of the rights acquired by consumers in time-sharing holidays, and firmly believes that the property of this right is a creditor's right rather than a real right. The third part summarizes the main types of disputes related to the rights of consumers in time-sharing holidays, including the disputes related to the acquisition of rights and the content of rights. Disputes related to the exercise of rights and disputes related to the elimination of rights. In view of these dispute types, the article carries on two levels analysis separately, one is the summary to the existing judicial solution, the other is the author's own viewpoint. Since consumers' right to withdraw plays an extremely important role in timesharing, the provisions on consumers' right of withdrawal in our country cannot be applied in this paper. Because it is very inefficient to resolve the time-sharing dispute in the framework of the current legal system, the fourth part of this paper puts forward the corresponding legislative suggestions, including the construction of the information disclosure system. The consummation of the system of consumers' right of withdrawal, the strengthening of the regulation of contract content and the construction of relevant supporting system. It is hoped that such legislative improvements will lead to a healthier development of timeshare. In the last part of the article, the author concludes that we should find a balance between the stability of the law and the continuous development of the law, and promote the perfection of the system and the development of timesharing through careful and rational analysis and construction.
【學位授予單位】：南京大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.8
本文編號：2378586
[Abstract]:Timeshare is a new type of transaction arrangement which develops rapidly in foreign countries but often falls into difficulties in our country. It involves more subjects, has a longer life span and contains a great deal of risks. As the market of timeshare is not developed in China, the research on it is mainly focused on the introduction and introduction of extraterritorial laws. The empirical analysis of timeshare is rare from the angle of explanation, which is a defect to the application of law. After a brief introduction of the origin and development of timeshare, this paper defines timeshare as the object of this paper. In order to be more realistic, this study is based on the consolidation of a large number of cases in practice. Based on the analysis of the main content and nature of consumer rights in time-sharing holidays, this paper makes a targeted discussion on the main problems in practice, and points out the deficiencies in the current legal system of time-sharing holidays in China. On this basis, the article finally put forward some legislative suggestions for its better development. Under this framework, the article is divided into five parts. The first part reviews the definition of timeshare at home and abroad after combing the development of timeshare, focusing on the European Union, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States legislation. On this basis, a broad definition of timeshare is made. In order to carry out the research in depth, the research object of this paper is limited. In the second part, on the basis of sorting out the cases in practice, the main contents of the consumer rights under the arrangement of timeshare transaction are extracted. On this basis, the author makes a different analysis of the nature of the rights acquired by consumers in time-sharing holidays, and firmly believes that the property of this right is a creditor's right rather than a real right. The third part summarizes the main types of disputes related to the rights of consumers in time-sharing holidays, including the disputes related to the acquisition of rights and the content of rights. Disputes related to the exercise of rights and disputes related to the elimination of rights. In view of these dispute types, the article carries on two levels analysis separately, one is the summary to the existing judicial solution, the other is the author's own viewpoint. Since consumers' right to withdraw plays an extremely important role in timesharing, the provisions on consumers' right of withdrawal in our country cannot be applied in this paper. Because it is very inefficient to resolve the time-sharing dispute in the framework of the current legal system, the fourth part of this paper puts forward the corresponding legislative suggestions, including the construction of the information disclosure system. The consummation of the system of consumers' right of withdrawal, the strengthening of the regulation of contract content and the construction of relevant supporting system. It is hoped that such legislative improvements will lead to a healthier development of timeshare. In the last part of the article, the author concludes that we should find a balance between the stability of the law and the continuous development of the law, and promote the perfection of the system and the development of timesharing through careful and rational analysis and construction.
【學位授予單位】：南京大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.8
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前6條
1 王金根;;歐洲民法典草案消費者撤回權制度研究[J];北方法學;2012年05期
2 楊立新;;非傳統(tǒng)銷售方式購買商品的消費者反悔權及其適用[J];法學;2014年02期
3 陳耀東;任容慶;;租賃權型分時度假法律性質的思考[J];華僑大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年04期
4 盧宏;;分時度假的經濟學分析[J];經濟問題探索;2008年02期
5 金波,關海玲;試論在中國應如何推進分時度假[J];生產力研究;2004年07期
6 郭巍;;我國發(fā)展分時度假的制約因素及其啟示[J];揚州大學學報(人文社會科學版);2007年03期
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 本報記者 孟剛;[N];中國消費者報;2014年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 孫麗娜;分時度假權利研究[D];寧波大學;2010年
2 李珉;分時享有使用權和所有權模式之比較研究[D];華東政法大學;2008年
，本文編號：2378586
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2378586.html
