【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代社會權(quán)利意識的強化,作為人格權(quán)之一的隱私權(quán),呈現(xiàn)出明顯的擴張趨勢。另一方面,新的網(wǎng)絡(luò)和傳媒技術(shù)又不斷壓縮人們的隱私空間,挑戰(zhàn)著隱私權(quán)保護。對公眾人物隱私權(quán)的保護和限制由是陷入了矛盾重生又岌岌可危的境地。我國對隱私權(quán)的保護相對滯后,立法中尚無關(guān)于公眾人物隱私權(quán)的相關(guān)規(guī)定,這直接導(dǎo)致在侵權(quán)案件頻發(fā)的當(dāng)下,司法裁判無章可循的混亂。本文以公眾人物的隱私權(quán)為研究對象,通過理論分析和比較研究的方法,從類型化的視角探討對其進行限制與保護的原則、范圍,旨在為規(guī)范我國的公眾人物隱私權(quán)保護與限制提供些許參考和理論支撐。除緒論與結(jié)論部分外,本文的分析和論述過程分四個部分。第二章是對研究公眾人物的隱私權(quán)所涉及的基本問題進行界定。在分別介紹了隱私權(quán)與公眾人物的定義,并對公眾人物進行類型化區(qū)分；之后,通過分析總結(jié)出公眾人物的隱私權(quán)區(qū)別于一般意義上的隱私權(quán)的特征；最后提出人格自由與人格尊嚴(yán)、權(quán)利不得濫用和秩序是公眾人物的隱私權(quán)所保護的價值所在。第三章是對公眾人物的隱私權(quán)進行保護和限制的范圍的理論探討。該部分從基本原則出發(fā),對上文提出的不同類型的公眾人物的隱私權(quán)的保護與限制范圍進行了論述。利益衡量原則是對公眾人物的隱私權(quán)進行必要限制的正當(dāng)性的根本來源,同時根據(jù)不同的類型,還要考慮對權(quán)利讓渡的推定,并以公共利益或者公眾的合理興趣為最終判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。不同類型的公眾人物,隱私權(quán)受到公共利益等原則限制的程度也應(yīng)該有所區(qū)別。第四章是對公眾人物的隱私權(quán)問題的比較法研究。分析并闡述了我國對公眾人物隱私權(quán)進行法律保護和限制存在的缺陷,同時對美國、德國和英國在這一方面的立法進行了介紹,進而總結(jié)了國外立法例對我國相關(guān)立法完善的一些重要啟示。第五章提出了規(guī)范我國公眾人物隱私權(quán)的法律保護和限制的建議。以《人格權(quán)法》制定為藍(lán)圖,結(jié)合前文對研究內(nèi)容的論述和比較研究,提出完善我國隱私權(quán)法律保護,進而構(gòu)建區(qū)分不同類型的公眾人物隱私權(quán)法律保護與限制框架的設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:With the strengthening of the consciousness of right in modern society, the right of privacy, as one of personality rights, shows an obvious tendency of expansion. On the other hand, the new network and media technology constantly compressed people's privacy space, challenging the privacy protection. The protection and restriction of the privacy right of public figures fall into contradictory rebirth and perilous situation. The protection of privacy in our country lags behind, and there are no relevant provisions on the privacy of public figures in the legislation, which directly leads to the confusion of the judicial decision with no rules to follow when the infringement cases occur frequently. This paper takes the privacy of public figures as the research object, through theoretical analysis and comparative research methods, from the perspective of typology to explore the principles and scope of its limitation and protection. The aim is to provide some reference and theoretical support for regulating the protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures in China. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the analysis and discussion of the process is divided into four parts. The second chapter defines the basic issues involved in the study of the privacy of public figures. After introducing the definition of the right to privacy and the public figure, and classifying the public figure, the author summarizes the characteristics of the privacy right of the public figure which is different from the privacy right in the general sense. Finally, the author points out that the value of the privacy of public figures lies in the freedom and dignity of personality, the right not to be abused and the order. The third chapter discusses the scope of the protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures. Based on the basic principles, this part discusses the protection and limitation of the privacy of different types of public figures mentioned above. The principle of interest measurement is the fundamental source of the legitimacy of the necessary restrictions on the privacy of public figures, and the presumption of the transfer of rights should be considered according to different types. And take the public interest or the public reasonable interest as the final judgment standard. For different types of public figures, the right to privacy should be restricted by principles such as public interest. The fourth chapter is a comparative study on the privacy of public figures. This paper analyzes and expounds the defects of the legal protection and restriction of the privacy rights of public figures in China, and introduces the legislation of the United States, Germany and Britain in this respect. And then summarizes some important enlightenment of foreign legislation cases on the improvement of relevant legislation in China. The fifth chapter puts forward some suggestions to regulate the legal protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures in China. Based on the blueprint of the Law of Personality Rights, this paper puts forward the idea of perfecting the legal protection of the right of privacy in China and constructing the legal protection and restriction framework of the privacy rights of different types of public figures in combination with the previous discussion and comparative study on the contents of the study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王瑋;權(quán)利讓渡原則與社會穩(wěn)定[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年02期

2 張新寶;;隱私權(quán)研究[J];法學(xué)研究;1990年03期

，

本文編號：2328648