發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-03 13:02

【摘要】：過(guò)失相抵,是賠償權(quán)利人對(duì)損害的發(fā)生或者擴(kuò)大具有過(guò)失,根據(jù)其過(guò)錯(cuò)程度對(duì)賠償義務(wù)人的損害賠償責(zé)任依法減輕或者免除的一種制度。過(guò)失相抵制度旨在公平正義的理念下平衡侵權(quán)人和受害人的利益。該制度理論精深,實(shí)際運(yùn)用復(fù)雜,特別是在未成年人受侵害案件中,受害人的特殊性對(duì)該制度的適用提出了更高的要求。但是我國(guó)目前在過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的立法和司法實(shí)踐方面存在的問(wèn)題頗多,《民法通則》和《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》均未對(duì)未成年人受侵害時(shí)侵權(quán)人和監(jiān)護(hù)人的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問(wèn)題做出明確規(guī)定,立法的不完善造成了司法實(shí)踐中做法的不統(tǒng)一。本文試圖從我國(guó)過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在未成年人受侵害案件的適用過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題入手,通過(guò)理論研究、比較法的研究、案例研究得出關(guān)于該制度更為合理的理論,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國(guó)過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在未成年人受侵害案件中的適用提出完善建議。除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)之外,本文共分為五部分。第一部分在對(duì)過(guò)失相抵的概念進(jìn)行介紹后,提出我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在未成年人受侵害案件的適用過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題,主要有以下兩方面:未成年人自身的過(guò)失相抵能力及適用問(wèn)題和監(jiān)護(hù)人的過(guò)失及適用問(wèn)題。第二部分對(duì)未成年受害人適用過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的基本理論進(jìn)行了探討,主要包括過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的法理基礎(chǔ)和適用范圍兩方面,在對(duì)多種學(xué)說(shuō)進(jìn)行綜合分析介紹后,筆者認(rèn)為過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的法理基礎(chǔ)為民法的公平原則和侵權(quán)法的責(zé)任自負(fù)原則,在適用范圍方面應(yīng)對(duì)過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任領(lǐng)域和未成年受害人范圍的適用做出限制。第三部分對(duì)未成年人的過(guò)失相抵能力進(jìn)行探討,從理論說(shuō)明、國(guó)外規(guī)定和我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐的做法三個(gè)方面分析,認(rèn)為應(yīng)承認(rèn)未成年人自身的過(guò)失相抵能力,將過(guò)失相抵能力與民事行為能力制度相統(tǒng)一。第四部分對(duì)監(jiān)護(hù)人過(guò)失的適用問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討,亦從理論說(shuō)明、國(guó)外規(guī)定和我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐的做法三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析,認(rèn)為監(jiān)護(hù)人的過(guò)失不應(yīng)該由未成年受害人承擔(dān)不利后果,不應(yīng)以監(jiān)護(hù)人過(guò)失為由適用過(guò)失相抵。第五部分針對(duì)過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在未成年人受侵害案件適用中的不足,為更加完善的未成年人救濟(jì)機(jī)制提出自己的建議。主要包括以下三個(gè)方面:一是完善過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的理論基礎(chǔ),將過(guò)失相抵能力納入過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的構(gòu)成要件中,以具體的生活標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為劃分基礎(chǔ)明確規(guī)定未成年受害人的過(guò)失相抵能力;二是監(jiān)護(hù)人過(guò)失的相關(guān)規(guī)定,在未成年人作為受害人的情況下,應(yīng)明確規(guī)定不得以監(jiān)護(hù)人的過(guò)失為由適用過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則;三是建立和完善多元化的受害人救濟(jì)機(jī)制,主要是完善保險(xiǎn)制度在保護(hù)未成年人的利益方面的作用。
[Abstract]:Fault offset is a system in which the obligee of the right of compensation is negligent to the occurrence or expansion of the damage and mitigates or absolves the liability of the indemnification obligor according to the degree of his fault. Fault offset system aims to balance the interests of infringers and victims under the concept of fairness and justice. The theory of the system is profound and the practical application is complicated. Especially in the case of minors being infringed, the particularity of the victim puts forward higher requirements for the application of the system. However, there are many problems in the legislation and judicial practice of fault offset rule in our country at present. Neither the General principles of Civil Law nor the Tort liability Law clearly stipulates the responsibility of the infringer and guardian when the minor is infringed. The imperfect legislation leads to the inconsistency of the judicial practice. This paper attempts to start with the problems existing in the application of the fault offset rule in the case of minor infringement in China. Through theoretical research, comparative law research, case study, the author draws a more reasonable theory about the system. On this basis, the author puts forward some suggestions on the application of fault offset rule in minor infringement cases. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts. The first part, after introducing the concept of fault offset, puts forward the problems existing in the application of fault offset rule in the case of minor infringement in our country's judicial practice. There are two main aspects: the minor's own fault offset ability and the application problem and the guardian's fault and the application question. The second part discusses the basic theory of applying fault offset rules to minor victims, mainly including the legal basis and scope of application of fault offset rules. After comprehensive analysis and introduction of various theories, The author holds that the legal basis of the rule of fault offset is the principle of fairness in civil law and the principle of liability conceit in tort law. In terms of application scope, the application of fault offset rule in the field of no-fault liability and the scope of minor victims should be restricted. In the third part, the author discusses the offsetting capacity of minors, and analyzes it from three aspects: theoretical explanation, foreign regulations and judicial practice in our country, and holds that the juvenile's own offenses offsetting capacity should be recognized. The system of capacity for offending negligence and capacity for civil conduct should be unified. The fourth part discusses the application of guardian's fault, and analyzes it from three aspects of theory, foreign regulations and judicial practice of our country. The author thinks that the guardian's fault should not bear the adverse consequences by the minor victim. No fault shall be applied on the grounds of the fault of the guardian. The fifth part aims at the deficiency of fault offset rule in the case of minor infringement, and puts forward some suggestions for a more perfect relief mechanism for minors. It mainly includes the following three aspects: first, perfect the theoretical basis of the fault offset rule, and bring the fault offset capacity into the constitutive elements of the fault offset rule. On the basis of specific standard of living, the offending capacity of the minor victim is clearly defined; Second, the relevant provisions of guardian fault, in the case of minors as victims, it should be clearly stipulated that the guardian's fault should not be applied on the grounds of fault offset rule; Third, the establishment and improvement of diversified victim relief mechanism, mainly to improve the role of insurance system in the protection of the interests of minors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 孫公幸,邢樂(lè)勤;過(guò)失相抵在道路交通事故損害賠償中的運(yùn)用[J];法律適用(國(guó)家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年05期

2 張倩;;論我國(guó)合同法中的過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年28期

3 李璐;臧小昊;;過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在高度危險(xiǎn)責(zé)任中的適用[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年05期

4 樓淑馨;;過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則之與實(shí)踐應(yīng)用[J];新聞天地(下半月刊);2010年09期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 胡勇軍;;過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在特殊侵權(quán)中的適用[A];中國(guó)民商法實(shí)務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2004年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前6條

1 梁慧星 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所研究員;中國(guó)合同法不承認(rèn)過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2013年

2 彭輝;侵權(quán)責(zé)任中過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的適用[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2014年

3 上海鐵路運(yùn)輸中級(jí)法院 孟嶄;過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在《合同法》中的適用[N];上海法治報(bào);2014年

4 劉雁兵 陳軍校 劉昆明;無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任中的“過(guò)錯(cuò)”問(wèn)題[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年

5 祁雪凍;過(guò)失相抵原則難適用道交法第76條應(yīng)修改[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

6 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授 楊立新;過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的適用[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李興明;論侵權(quán)法中的過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2009年

2 常青;侵權(quán)法中過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則研究[D];山西大學(xué);2009年

3 李紅軍;論過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在我國(guó)的適用[D];湘潭大學(xué);2009年

4 張?jiān)?過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的適用問(wèn)題研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

5 黃堅(jiān);論侵權(quán)法中過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的適用[D];湘潭大學(xué);2011年

6 李晨輝;侵權(quán)損害賠償中的過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2013年

7 黃晶晶;論侵權(quán)行為法上的過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

8 孫天姝;論過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2006年

9 郭瑤;論道路交通事故損害賠償中過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則的適用[D];新疆大學(xué);2014年

10 高麗佳;論過(guò)失相抵規(guī)則在未成年人受侵害案件中的適用[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2307863