【摘要】：人身安全保護(hù)令的相關(guān)規(guī)定實(shí)施已過一年,基層組織的實(shí)施研究還比較缺乏。相比于基層組織,更多研究著眼于婦聯(lián)組織的反家暴活動(dòng)。整體上看,對(duì)人身安全保護(hù)令的研究重點(diǎn)在保護(hù)令規(guī)定的法律完善和執(zhí)行困境上。具體而言,在立法程序上,申請(qǐng)和執(zhí)行程序正逐步完善,執(zhí)行主體中公安機(jī)關(guān)的呼聲最高。在司法介入的尺度上仍存爭議,家暴的救濟(jì)手段和非正式支持仍然緊缺。人身安全保護(hù)令對(duì)于解決家庭暴力案件意義重大,但由于申請(qǐng)和協(xié)助執(zhí)行保護(hù)令的過程缺乏相應(yīng)的法律指引,基層組織甚至其他執(zhí)行機(jī)關(guān)在實(shí)施中依然存在障礙。本文旨在通過相關(guān)制度的分析和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的總結(jié),結(jié)合調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù),為基層組織申請(qǐng)及執(zhí)行人身安全保護(hù)令的程序和具體方案提出建議,聯(lián)動(dòng)其他部門共同促進(jìn)執(zhí)行保護(hù)令工作的落實(shí),為人身安全保護(hù)令的施行提供明確的理論依據(jù)。本文通過三個(gè)部分對(duì)人身安全保護(hù)令在基層組織的實(shí)施問題展開論述。第一部分,著重分析人身安全保護(hù)令目前的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,在理論上和實(shí)踐中呈現(xiàn)出怎樣的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),對(duì)調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析;第二部分,分析基層組織實(shí)施中的影響因素,實(shí)施工作中存在的障礙;第三部分,從便于實(shí)施的角度出發(fā),探討實(shí)施中突出問題的解決策略。本文認(rèn)為保護(hù)令實(shí)施中的主要問題在于,執(zhí)行主體職能不明、外部支持缺乏,執(zhí)行方式及措施有待明確,執(zhí)行的后續(xù)監(jiān)督難以保障。對(duì)此提出的主要解決措施是,增加與保護(hù)令相關(guān)的令狀種類,主要以監(jiān)督令為中心,目的在于解決相關(guān)組織、團(tuán)體職能不清的問題。明確了基層組織在執(zhí)行保護(hù)令中的監(jiān)督位置,并設(shè)置了“監(jiān)督人”的角色。對(duì)申請(qǐng)保護(hù)令時(shí)受害人的不同情況進(jìn)行歸類,將執(zhí)行保護(hù)令前后的評(píng)估工作從程序上和內(nèi)容上明確下來。進(jìn)一步明確拒絕執(zhí)行保護(hù)令和違反保護(hù)令的懲戒措施,并提出了針對(duì)受害人的救濟(jì)方案。
[Abstract]:One year has passed since the implementation of the relevant regulations of the personal protection order, and the research on the implementation of the basic organization is still lacking. More research has focused on anti-violence activities organized by women's federations than at the grass-roots level. On the whole, the research on habeas corpus focuses on the perfection of the law and the difficulties of enforcement. Specifically, in the legislative procedure, the application and execution procedures are gradually improved, and the public security organs are the most vocal. There is still controversy in the yardstick of judicial intervention, and the remedies and informal support for domestic violence are still scarce. Personal security orders are of great significance in resolving domestic violence cases. However, due to the lack of corresponding legal guidance in the process of applying for and assisting in the enforcement of protection orders, there are still obstacles in the implementation of such orders by grass-roots organizations and even other enforcement agencies. The purpose of this paper is to put forward some suggestions on the procedure and specific scheme of applying for and executing personal security orders for grass-roots organizations through the analysis of relevant systems and the summary of practical experience, combined with the survey data. Other departments work together to promote the implementation of the protection order, to provide a clear theoretical basis for the implementation of the personal security order. This paper discusses the implementation of personal security orders in grassroots organizations through three parts. The first part focuses on the analysis of the current development of the personal security protection order, in theory and in practice what kind of development trend, to analyze the survey data; The second part analyzes the influencing factors in the implementation of grass-roots organizations and the obstacles in the implementation. The third part discusses the solutions to the outstanding problems in the implementation from the point of view of easy implementation. This paper points out that the main problems in the implementation of the protection order are that the main function of the executive body is unclear, the external support is lacking, the execution method and measures need to be clarified, and the follow-up supervision of the implementation is difficult to guarantee. The main solution to this problem is to increase the types of writ related to the protection order, mainly focusing on the supervision order, in order to solve the problem of unclear functions of the relevant organizations and groups. It clarifies the supervision position of grass-roots organizations in the enforcement of protection orders and sets up the role of "supervisor". Categorize the different circumstances of the victim when applying for a protection order and clarify the procedure and content of the assessment before and after the execution of the protection order. Further explicit refusal to enforce protection orders and disciplinary measures for violation of protection orders, and proposed remedies for victims.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;反家庭暴力工作的實(shí)踐與探索[J];中國婦運(yùn);2016年08期

2 陳敏;;人身安全保護(hù)令實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀、挑戰(zhàn)及其解決[J];預(yù)防青少年犯罪研究;2016年03期

3 季鳳建;;芻議人身安全保護(hù)令的執(zhí)行[J];人民司法(應(yīng)用);2016年10期

4 王世洲;;現(xiàn)代英國反對(duì)家庭暴力的主要法律制度研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2016年01期

5 馮俊偉;;論促進(jìn)家庭暴力認(rèn)定的證據(jù)機(jī)制——以訴訟行為的激勵(lì)作用為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年05期

6 鄭曦;;暮色中的微光:美國聯(lián)邦人身保護(hù)令制度[J];比較法研究;2014年06期

7 崔詩婉;羅婕;;我國當(dāng)前反家暴婦女庇護(hù)所的發(fā)展困境與未來出路[J];研究生法學(xué);2013年05期

8 姜虹;;民事保護(hù)令執(zhí)行主體的立法考量——以公安機(jī)關(guān)作為民事保護(hù)令執(zhí)行主體是否適格為切入點(diǎn)[J];公安研究;2013年07期

9 陳葦;段偉偉;;法院在防治家庭暴力中的作用實(shí)證研究——以重慶市某區(qū)人民法院審理涉及家庭暴力案件情況為對(duì)象[J];河北法學(xué);2012年08期

10 肖建國;;論民事保護(hù)令的中國特色[J];婦女研究論叢;2012年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2304047