【摘要】：計(jì)算機(jī)字體是訴訟中遇到的一個(gè)難點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。對(duì)于字體的定義和定性,審判結(jié)果與理論界有很大的爭(zhēng)議。但是平常無(wú)論編輯文稿或者設(shè)計(jì)演講稿,都離不開(kāi)形形色色、各有特點(diǎn)的字體,就連本篇論文也用了宋體、黑體以及TIMES NEW ROMAN等多款字體。正是因?yàn)榕c日常生活的緊密結(jié)合,以及大多數(shù)人對(duì)于相關(guān)權(quán)利不甚了解,才會(huì)有現(xiàn)在這種稍顯混亂的現(xiàn)狀。論文的第一部分是概述,主要介紹了相關(guān)概念。首先是對(duì)印刷體、手寫(xiě)體,字體與平面設(shè)計(jì)、書(shū)法,還有實(shí)用字體與藝術(shù)字體,矢量字體與點(diǎn)陣字體的區(qū)分比較。其次是立足于現(xiàn)有的一些案例,從不同的侵權(quán)方式來(lái)進(jìn)行一個(gè)歸納。第二部分是著作權(quán)分析,主要結(jié)合字體本身的特性來(lái)進(jìn)行法理分析,試圖明晰字體是軟件還是數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù),能否作為美術(shù)作品或者演繹作品受到著作權(quán)法保護(hù)等問(wèn)題。這一部分是本文的核心,創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)是通過(guò)幾個(gè)設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)例來(lái)說(shuō)明了字體在設(shè)計(jì)中的重要性問(wèn)題,從作品手稿美術(shù)作品構(gòu)成展開(kāi),否定了字體軟件和輸出的單字之美術(shù)作品屬性。第三部分是從公共利益、權(quán)力用盡以及限制許可的角度分析是否應(yīng)當(dāng)保護(hù)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán),以及如何在現(xiàn)有法律框架內(nèi)保護(hù)字體——主要是意圖通過(guò)合同、侵權(quán)訴訟以及改進(jìn)著作權(quán)登記制度三個(gè)方面來(lái)進(jìn)行保護(hù)。最終得出結(jié)論,分析了保護(hù)字庫(kù)的必要性和利益平衡,并且對(duì)于法律的修改和行業(yè)發(fā)展提出一些建設(shè)性的意見(jiàn)。
[Abstract]:Computer font is a difficult problem in litigation. As to the definition and nature of font, there is a great dispute between the trial result and the theory circle. However, no matter how to edit or design a speech, we can not get away from all kinds of fonts. Even this paper uses many fonts, such as Song style, boldface and TIMES NEW ROMAN, etc. It is the closeness of daily life and the lack of understanding of the rights of most people that make the present state of affairs a bit confusing. The first part of the paper is an overview, mainly introduces the related concepts. The first is the distinction between print, handwritten, font and graphic design, calligraphy, practical and artistic fonts, vector fonts and lattice fonts. The second is based on some existing cases, from different ways to sum up the infringement. The second part is copyright analysis, mainly combining the characteristics of the font itself to carry out legal analysis, trying to clarify whether the font is software or database, whether it can be protected by copyright law as art works or deductive works, and so on. This part is the core of this paper, the innovation is to illustrate the importance of font in the design through several design examples, from the composition of manuscripts art works, denied the font software and the output of the properties of the art works. The third part is an analysis of whether computer software copyright should be protected from the perspective of public interest, exhaustion of power and restrictions on licensing, and how to protect fonts within the existing legal framework, primarily with a view to adopting contracts. Tort litigation and the improvement of copyright registration system to protect three aspects. Finally, the necessity and benefit balance of protecting the font are analyzed, and some constructive suggestions are put forward for the amendment of the law and the development of the industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 劉西省;;字體設(shè)計(jì)在平面設(shè)計(jì)中的重要性[J];包裝工程;2007年10期

2 李明德;;美國(guó)版權(quán)法與字體、字型和字庫(kù)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年06期

3 崔國(guó)斌;;單字字體和字庫(kù)軟件可能受著作權(quán)法保護(hù)[J];法學(xué);2011年07期

4 馮曉青,馮曄;試論著作權(quán)法中作品獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的界定[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年05期

5 許春明;論數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)的版權(quán)保護(hù)[J];情報(bào)雜志;2002年05期

6 張平;;再談?dòng)?jì)算機(jī)字體的法律保護(hù)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2299548