【摘要】：新型權(quán)利表面繁榮的背后有一些方法論上的隱憂值得關(guān)注:權(quán)利標(biāo)準(zhǔn)缺失,一些權(quán)利束、權(quán)能也被當(dāng)作新型權(quán)利加以研究。在紛繁復(fù)雜的權(quán)利理論叢林中,學(xué)者應(yīng)說明采用哪種權(quán)利理論在論證新型權(quán)利。新型權(quán)利研究在技術(shù)上也存在瑕疵,權(quán)利所對應(yīng)的義務(wù)常被研究者忽略,其應(yīng)予明確。新型權(quán)利證成中權(quán)利的沖突、權(quán)利義務(wù)之間的匹配關(guān)系應(yīng)進(jìn)一步精細(xì)化,利益衡量應(yīng)當(dāng)被引入到新型權(quán)利研究中。新型權(quán)利應(yīng)該具有某種道德上的正當(dāng)性,即從道德權(quán)利發(fā)展為法律權(quán)利,所以新型權(quán)利的研究應(yīng)當(dāng)是一個發(fā)現(xiàn)的過程,而非一個創(chuàng)造的過程,發(fā)現(xiàn)的源泉應(yīng)當(dāng)是道德基礎(chǔ),尤其是公德。新型權(quán)利研究的目標(biāo)應(yīng)當(dāng)是說服立法者或司法者接受該項(xiàng)權(quán)利的存在,那就要求研究的精細(xì)和對話性,而不能將所有有關(guān)利益的主張都賦予"權(quán)利"的身份。
[Abstract]:There are some methodological worries behind the prosperity of new rights: the lack of standards, the bundle of rights and the study of power as new rights. In the complicated right theory jungle, scholars should explain which rights theory is used to demonstrate the new right. The study of new rights also has defects in technology, the corresponding obligations of rights are often ignored by researchers, which should be clearly defined. The matching relationship between rights and obligations should be further refined, and the measurement of interests should be introduced into the study of new rights. The new right should have some moral legitimacy, that is, from the moral right to the legal right, so the study of the new right should be a process of discovery, not a process of creation, and the source of discovery should be the moral foundation. Especially public morality. The goal of the study of new rights should be to persuade the legislator or the judiciary to accept the existence of the right, which requires that the research should be subtle and conversational, and that all the claims of interests should not be assigned to the status of "right".
【作者單位】： 黑龍江大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D923
，

本文編號：2247390