【摘要】：隨著社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，人民生活水平不斷提高，政治生活、娛樂八卦等已越來越受到人們的關(guān)注，公眾人物這一概念便逐漸產(chǎn)生。公眾人物因其自身身份特殊，人們對其隱私更有興趣，更有好奇心，，常常被作為人們茶余飯后聊天消遣的對象，甚至成為媒體追求商業(yè)利益的籌碼。如今，公眾人物的隱私遭受新聞媒體肆無忌憚的曝光而引發(fā)爭議的現(xiàn)象屢見不鮮，在公眾知情權(quán)、新聞自由和輿論監(jiān)督面前，公眾人物隱私權(quán)似乎已被剝離。有觀點(diǎn)說公眾人物不該享有隱私權(quán)，也有觀點(diǎn)說應(yīng)該對其隱私權(quán)予以限制，而卻很少有人談及對其予以保護(hù)，似乎大家都忽略了這個問題。但作為自然人，即使其隱私權(quán)要受到公眾知情權(quán)的約束，其依法仍應(yīng)享有隱私權(quán)，以維護(hù)其人格尊嚴(yán)、人格利益。 本文正是在公眾人物隱私權(quán)問題在理論、立法及實(shí)踐中都成為熱點(diǎn)問題，與其相關(guān)的侵權(quán)事件頻頻發(fā)生的大背景下，在對公眾人物及其隱私權(quán)進(jìn)行理論論述的基礎(chǔ)上，探析我國目前的相關(guān)立法，并進(jìn)一步指出其中的缺陷，再借鑒美國、德國和英國在這方面的有益經(jīng)驗后，提出了合理、有效地維護(hù)我國公眾人物隱私權(quán)的完善方案。以祈深化認(rèn)識和理解公眾人物隱私權(quán)，加強(qiáng)對其的重視程度，并且促進(jìn)與其相關(guān)的民事立法的完善。本文主要部分共劃分成四章： 第一章：從公眾人物這一概念的發(fā)展演變?nèi)胧�，結(jié)合其在我國發(fā)展的實(shí)際，揭示出公眾人物的實(shí)質(zhì)。然后對公眾人物隱私權(quán)的界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行重點(diǎn)論述，從而更好地把握其范圍和特征。為第四章提出完善方案提供理論上的依據(jù)。 第二章：對我國公眾人物隱私權(quán)的民事立法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析，揭露其中存在的諸多缺陷，包括立法存在缺失，立法相對滯后，未形成完善的法律體系等。給第四章提出完善方案提供法律上的依據(jù)。 第三章：對比探析美、德、英三國有關(guān)公眾人物隱私權(quán)民事立法保護(hù)的狀況，概括其中先進(jìn)做法，并予以借鑒。為第四章提出完善方案提供經(jīng)驗上的依據(jù)。 第四章：對上述有關(guān)公眾人物、公眾人物隱私權(quán)的理論進(jìn)行充分理解之后，正視我國目前立法中存在的問題和缺陷，同時借鑒國外有益經(jīng)驗，提出合理的立法保護(hù)方案，使我國公眾人物隱私權(quán)的民事立法更完備，保護(hù)更合理。在立法上，采取直接立法模式，確認(rèn)公眾人物隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的基本原則、保護(hù)范圍、責(zé)任承擔(dān)，以實(shí)現(xiàn)對其進(jìn)行合理、有效地維護(hù)。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy and the improvement of people's living standard, people pay more and more attention to the political life and entertainment and gossip, so the concept of public figure has gradually come into being. Because of their special identity, public figures are more interested in their privacy and more curious. They are often used as the objects for people to chat after dinner, and even become chips for the media to pursue business interests. Nowadays, the privacy of public figures has been exposed unbridled by the news media and caused controversy. In the face of the public right to know, freedom of the press and public opinion supervision, the privacy of public figures seems to have been stripped. There are some opinions that public figures should not enjoy the right to privacy, others say that they should be restricted, but few people talk about protecting them, it seems that everyone has ignored this problem. But as a natural person, even if his right to privacy is restricted by the public's right to know, he should still enjoy the right to privacy in accordance with the law in order to safeguard his personal dignity and interests. This article is just in the public personage privacy question in the theory, the legislation and the practice all becomes the hot spot question, the related tort event frequently occurs under the big background, in carries on the theory elaboration to the public figure and its right of privacy on the basis of, This paper probes into the relevant legislation of our country at present, and further points out the defects therein, and then draws lessons from the beneficial experiences of the United States, Germany and Britain in this respect, and puts forward a perfect scheme to protect the privacy rights of public figures in our country reasonably and effectively. In order to deepen the understanding and understanding of the privacy of public figures, strengthen the degree of attention to it, and promote the improvement of civil legislation related to it. The main part of this paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter: starting from the development and evolution of the concept of public figure, combined with the reality of its development in China, reveals the essence of public figure. Then the definition standard of public personage privacy is discussed in order to better grasp its scope and characteristics. It provides the theoretical basis for the fourth chapter to put forward the perfect scheme. The second chapter analyzes the current situation of the civil legislation on the privacy rights of public figures in China, and exposes many defects, including the absence of legislation, the relative lag of legislation, the lack of a perfect legal system, etc. To the fourth chapter to improve the program to provide the legal basis. Chapter three: compare and analyze the status of the civil legislation protection of the privacy right of public figures in America, Germany and Britain, summarize the advanced practices and draw lessons from them. It provides the experience basis for the fourth chapter to put forward the perfect plan. Chapter four: after fully understanding the above theories about public figures and public figures' privacy, we should face up to the problems and defects existing in our country's current legislation, and at the same time, draw lessons from the beneficial experience of foreign countries and put forward a reasonable legislative protection scheme. The civil legislation of privacy right of public figures in our country is more complete and more reasonable. In legislation, we adopt the direct legislative model to confirm the basic principle, scope and responsibility of the protection of the privacy of public figures, so as to realize the reasonable and effective maintenance of it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 金鑫;;論我國隱私權(quán)的民法保護(hù)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年02期

本文編號：2234287