【摘要】：由于過失所致純粹經(jīng)濟損失中受害群體以及行為人責(zé)任的不確定性,缺乏社會典型公開性,加之其僅僅是受害者金錢方面的損失,傳統(tǒng)理論中,各國侵權(quán)法普遍堅持過失所致純粹經(jīng)濟損失責(zé)任排除規(guī)則。各國對過失所致純粹經(jīng)濟損失不予賠償?shù)恼呖剂恳蛩刂饕兴l理論、價值位階理論、行為自由維護理論、契約法保護理論以及經(jīng)濟分析理論。但隨著社會的發(fā)展,上述政策考量因素逐一受到挑戰(zhàn),過失所致純粹經(jīng)濟損失例外賠償逐漸得到人們認可。我國《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為一般條款對待過失所致純粹經(jīng)濟損失的態(tài)度與法國侵權(quán)法中的概括模式相似。但實證分析表明,我國審判實踐中法官對待過失所致純粹經(jīng)濟損失的賠償問題卻偏向于德國的列舉遞進模式。本文通過對歷史關(guān)聯(lián)、制度優(yōu)勢、實踐銜接三方面的分析,認為我國過失所致純粹經(jīng)濟損失賠償規(guī)則的構(gòu)建應(yīng)借鑒德國的列舉遞進模式,形成一個三階層的規(guī)范體系,以此來為法官的審判實踐活動提供明晰與正確的指引。
[Abstract]:Due to the uncertainty of the victim group and the responsibility of the perpetrator in the pure economic loss caused by negligence, there is a lack of typical social openness, and it is only the loss of the victim's money. Tort law of various countries generally insists on the exclusive rule of liability for pure economic loss caused by negligence. The policy considerations of non-compensation for pure economic losses caused by negligence include sluice theory, value rank theory, behavior freedom maintenance theory, contract law protection theory and economic analysis theory. However, with the development of society, the above policy considerations are challenged one by one, and the exceptional compensation for pure economic losses caused by negligence is gradually accepted. The general terms of tort in tort liability law of our country treat pure economic loss caused by negligence similar to the general pattern in French tort law. However, the empirical analysis shows that, in our country's trial practice, the judges' compensation for pure economic losses caused by negligence is inclined to the German enumeration progressive model. Based on the analysis of historical relevance, institutional advantages and practical convergence, this paper holds that the construction of compensation rules for pure economic losses caused by negligence in China should draw lessons from Germany's enumeration and progression model and form a three-class normative system. In order to provide clear and correct guidance for the judge's trial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 梁慧星;;中國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法解說[J];北方法學(xué);2011年01期

2 于飛;;“法益”概念再辨析——德國侵權(quán)法的視角[J];政法論壇;2012年04期

3 葛云松;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》保護的民事權(quán)益[J];中國法學(xué);2010年03期

，

本文編號：2215522