【摘要】：我國《物權(quán)法》第24條將機動車與船舶、航空器等所有權(quán)變動作出統(tǒng)一規(guī)定,對此規(guī)定,學(xué)界和司法實務(wù)界存在不同的理解,爭議頗大。盡管2012年最高人民法院《關(guān)于審理買賣合同糾紛案件適用法律問題的解釋》第10條試圖對此予以進一步明確,但該問題亦未得到徹底解決�；诖�,本文在已有研究基礎(chǔ)上,專門針對機動車所有權(quán)變動進行探討,以期對我國機動車所有權(quán)變動模式的立法本源與本意予以“撥亂反正”之厘清,從而在揭示機動車所有權(quán)變動模式之本質(zhì)的基礎(chǔ)上,化解理論問題與爭議,提出完善我國機動車所有權(quán)變動模式的立法建議,并為機動車交易實踐提供符合實踐本身的理論指導(dǎo)。全文除了引言與結(jié)論部分,共由五章構(gòu)成：第一章,具體剖析機動車所有權(quán)變動的基本理論。具體包括：對機動車所有權(quán)變動相關(guān)的概念予以界定,為本文下一步的研究奠定基礎(chǔ)；對機動車所有權(quán)變動的樣態(tài)予以分析,并根據(jù)機動車所有權(quán)變動發(fā)生的原因,將機動車所有權(quán)變動分為基于法律行為發(fā)生的變動和非基于法律行為發(fā)生的變動；對機動車所有權(quán)變動的理論基礎(chǔ)即物權(quán)行為理論和債權(quán)行為理論予以闡釋,并尋求機動車所有權(quán)變動制度本身所追求的應(yīng)然價值。第二章,比較考察機動車所有權(quán)變動的立法模式。從比較法的角度,分別考察了意思主義模式與形式主義模式,并具體對機動車所有權(quán)變動的規(guī)定予以分析,為后續(xù)我國機動車所有權(quán)變動模式的重新選擇提供理論素材和立法經(jīng)驗。第三章,評析與反思我國現(xiàn)有的機動車所有權(quán)變動模式。在對我國《物權(quán)法》關(guān)于機動車所有權(quán)變動模式的規(guī)定予以評析的基礎(chǔ)上,明確了機動車登記與機動車所有權(quán)變動無關(guān),機動車所有權(quán)變動而未登記的,只是影響或者不產(chǎn)生所有者的“車籍權(quán)”。機動車本質(zhì)上屬于動產(chǎn),其所有權(quán)變動理應(yīng)采交付生效的債權(quán)形式主義立法模式。第四、五章,分析了我國機動車所有權(quán)變動重新選擇后的效應(yīng)體系。筆者分兩章對我國機動車所有權(quán)變動所涉及一些基本問題以及邊緣性問題予以探討,以期為完善我國機動車所有權(quán)變動相配套的制度體系提供理論依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Article 24 of the Real right Law of our country provides uniform regulations for the change of ownership of motor vehicle, ship, aircraft, etc. There are different understandings between the academic circles and the judicial and practical circles, and there is a great deal of controversy about this provision. Although Article 10 of the Supreme people's Court in 2012, "interpretation of the legal issues applicable to the hearing of disputes over sale and purchase contracts", attempts to further clarify this issue, the problem has not been thoroughly resolved. Based on this, this paper, on the basis of existing research, specifically discusses the change of motor vehicle ownership, in order to clarify the legislative origin and intention of the mode of motor vehicle ownership change in China. On the basis of revealing the essence of the motor vehicle ownership change mode, the paper resolves the theoretical problems and disputes, and puts forward some legislative suggestions to perfect the motor vehicle ownership change mode in China. It also provides theoretical guidance in accordance with the practice itself for motor vehicle trading practice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the thesis consists of five chapters: chapter one, the basic theory of motor vehicle ownership change. It includes: to define the concept of motor vehicle ownership change, to lay a foundation for the next research, to analyze the change of motor vehicle ownership, and according to the reasons of motor vehicle ownership change. The change of motor vehicle ownership is divided into the changes based on the legal act and the change based on the non-legal act, and the theoretical basis of the change of the ownership of the motor vehicle, namely, the theory of the act of real right and the theory of the act of creditor's rights, is explained. And seeks the motor vehicle ownership change system itself pursues the ought value. In the second chapter, the legislative model of motor vehicle ownership change is compared. From the point of view of comparative law, this paper investigates the mode of intention doctrine and formalism, and analyzes the regulation of the change of motor vehicle ownership. To provide theoretical material and legislative experience for the re-selection of motor vehicle ownership change mode in China. The third chapter analyzes and rethinks the existing mode of motor vehicle ownership change in China. On the basis of the analysis of the regulations on the mode of motor vehicle ownership change in the property Law of China, it is clear that the registration of motor vehicle has nothing to do with the change of ownership of motor vehicle, and that the change of ownership of motor vehicle is not registered. It only affects or does not produce the owner's "car registration right". Motor vehicle belongs to movable property essentially, its ownership change should adopt the legislation mode of creditor's rights formalism. The fourth and fifth chapters analyze the effect system after the change of motor vehicle ownership in China. The author divided two chapters into two chapters to discuss some basic problems and marginal problems involved in the change of motor vehicle ownership in China in order to provide theoretical basis for perfecting the corresponding system of motor vehicle ownership change in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 弗蘭克·費拉利,田士永;從抽象原則與合意原則到交付原則——論動產(chǎn)物權(quán)法法律協(xié)調(diào)之可能性[J];比較法研究;2001年03期

2 楊立新;;道路交通事故責(zé)任的概念及構(gòu)成要素[J];重慶社會科學(xué);2009年06期

3 楊代雄;;準(zhǔn)不動產(chǎn)的物權(quán)變動要件——《物權(quán)法》第24條及相關(guān)條款的解釋與完善[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2010年01期

4 溫世揚;周s，

本文編號：2204682