發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-04 21:06

【摘要】：東亞地區(qū)在房地關(guān)系上,不同于歐陸采房地一體模式,而認(rèn)建筑物與土地分離為獨(dú)立的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)客體,即采房地分離模式。當(dāng)事人可分別處分房與地,使得受讓后的房地權(quán)屬各異,若房地之間無地上權(quán)等制度勾連,則會(huì)產(chǎn)生大量拆屋還地的情形,此即房地分離產(chǎn)生的問題。對(duì)此,大陸規(guī)定"房地一致"原則,令房地聯(lián)動(dòng)發(fā)生權(quán)利變動(dòng),但實(shí)踐中卻產(chǎn)生房地分別抵押的情形,解釋上產(chǎn)生爭(zhēng)議。物權(quán)法頒布前后存在不同的解釋,但依據(jù)物權(quán)法的規(guī)定,只能采重復(fù)抵押說。在分別抵押中,存在對(duì)新增建筑物抵押的例外規(guī)定,該例外是大陸房地分離問題的不同處理方式。通過對(duì)現(xiàn)行規(guī)范的解析,本文總結(jié)了 "房地一致"原則的不足,進(jìn)而探求更好的解決方式。同樣存在房地分離問題的我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū),采用法定地上權(quán)以勾連房地,使得房地可分別抵押;采推定租賃關(guān)系以勾連房地,使得房地可分別讓與。但對(duì)于分別抵押和分別讓與的區(qū)別規(guī)定,產(chǎn)生了爭(zhēng)議,應(yīng)統(tǒng)一規(guī)定為法定地上權(quán)。而該法定地上權(quán)實(shí)為法定不動(dòng)產(chǎn)役權(quán)。借法臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的處理,為緩和"房地一致"原則過于僵硬造成的不足,對(duì)于抵押的情形,大陸可以在抵押權(quán)設(shè)定時(shí)發(fā)生法定不動(dòng)產(chǎn)役權(quán),從而令房地可以分別抵押,是處理房地分離問題更好的方式。另外的制度選擇是地上權(quán),但地上權(quán)未有明文規(guī)范,且需要重新設(shè)計(jì)大陸的土地制度,現(xiàn)行法上存在適用障礙。分別讓與可作類似處理。
[Abstract]:In East Asia, it is different from the integration model of European land and land in the relation of premises, but the separation of buildings and land is an independent object of real estate right, that is, the separation mode of real estate. The parties can dispose of the house and the ground separately, which makes the ownership of the transferred premises different. If there is no land right between the premises, there will be a large number of demolition and return to the land, which is the problem of the separation of the premises. In response to this, the mainland stipulates the principle of "consistency of premises", which makes the rights change in the linkage of premises, but in practice it produces the situation that the premises are mortgaged separately, and the interpretation is controversial. There are different interpretations before and after the promulgation of the Real right Law, but according to the provisions of the Real right Law, the theory of repeated mortgage can only be adopted. In the separate mortgage, there is an exception to the new building mortgage, which is a different way to deal with the separation of premises in the mainland. Through the analysis of the current standard, this paper summarizes the deficiency of the principle of "consistent premises", and then explores a better way to solve it. In Taiwan, where there is also the problem of separation of premises, the legal right of land is adopted to attach the premises, and the premises can be mortgaged separately, and the premises can be transferred separately by using the presumption lease relationship to connect the premises. However, there is a dispute about the difference between mortgage and assignment, which should be stipulated as legal right of land. And the legal right to land is the legal right of real estate servitude. In order to alleviate the deficiency caused by the rigid principle of "consistent premises", the mainland can take advantage of the handling of the Taiwan area by virtue of the law. In the case of mortgage, the mainland can have the legal right of real estate servitude at the time of the establishment of the mortgage, so that the premises can be mortgaged separately. Is a better way to deal with the separation of premises. The other system choice is the land right, but the land right is not regulated explicitly, and the land system in the mainland needs to be redesigned. There are some obstacles in the current law. Separate concessions may be treated similarly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 湯維建;;論司法拍賣市場(chǎng)化改革及其完善[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2015年01期

2 黃琳;姚寶華;;統(tǒng)一的房地分離抵押裁判規(guī)則的構(gòu)建——談物權(quán)法第一百八十二條的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2013年05期

3 高圣平;;土地與建筑物之間的物權(quán)利用關(guān)系辨析[J];法學(xué);2012年09期

4 朱曉U，

本文編號(hào)：2165142