本文選題：繼承協(xié)議 + 遺贈扶養(yǎng)協(xié)議��； 參考：《沈陽師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：以繼承權(quán)的賦予和拋棄為主要內(nèi)容的繼承協(xié)議制度起源于日耳曼法。但是因為該制度的規(guī)定和傳統(tǒng)的遺囑理論沖突,導(dǎo)致其在自己的發(fā)展和完善的道路上十分艱辛曲折。伴著社會不斷進(jìn)步發(fā)展,在繼承習(xí)慣改變、立法背景變動、實(shí)現(xiàn)法律價值的側(cè)重點(diǎn)等多種情況變化的影響下,在全世界法學(xué)界形成了關(guān)于繼承協(xié)議的三種不同的立法態(tài)度,即肯定立法、否定立法以及折中立法。本文采用比較研究法、內(nèi)容分析研究法、歷史研究法等方法,對繼承協(xié)議制度起源、發(fā)展、進(jìn)步、完善等方面學(xué)界現(xiàn)存的不同立法態(tài)度和涉及到的理論問題進(jìn)行研究,力求深入了解,以法學(xué)理論為出發(fā)點(diǎn)并結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐獲取在我國建立該制度的必要性和可行性,提出適合我國發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的立法構(gòu)想,彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)行繼承法存在的真空地帶。筆者將本文分為四個部分對繼承協(xié)議制度進(jìn)行了論述。首先,論述了繼承協(xié)議的一般理論,包括繼承協(xié)議的概念,繼承協(xié)議的法律特征及其歷史沿革;其次,對國外現(xiàn)存的三種繼承協(xié)議立法例進(jìn)行比較和研究,通過比較分析,借鑒持肯定立法態(tài)度國家的具體立法規(guī)制,提出在我國構(gòu)建繼承協(xié)議制度的構(gòu)想。接下來,對我國建立繼承協(xié)議制度的必要性和可行性進(jìn)行論證。本章將繼承協(xié)議制度與遺贈扶養(yǎng)協(xié)議和共同遺囑進(jìn)行對比,論證遺贈扶養(yǎng)協(xié)議與共同遺囑制度的缺陷,并結(jié)合我國傳統(tǒng)繼承習(xí)慣與歷史文化背景,研究分析我國建立繼承協(xié)議制度在實(shí)踐上的可行性。在文章的最后,主要論述了在我設(shè)立繼承協(xié)議制度具體實(shí)施的立法構(gòu)想。本文將我國的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況需求及繼承習(xí)慣和國外相關(guān)立法結(jié)合,量身定做,提出了在我國設(shè)立繼承協(xié)議制度方面的立法建議,用以彌補(bǔ)相關(guān)立法方面的空缺,在一定程度上規(guī)范民眾設(shè)立繼承協(xié)議行為的同時也為司法審判工作提供一定法律依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:The inheritance agreement system, which takes the inheritance right as the main content, originates from the Germanic law. However, because of the conflict between the regulations of the system and the traditional testamentary theory, the road of its own development and perfection is very difficult and tortuous. With the development of society, under the influence of the change of inheritance habits, the change of legislative background and the emphasis of realizing legal value, three different legislative attitudes about succession agreement have been formed in the world of legal circles. That is, positive legislation, negative legislation and compromise legislation. This paper uses the methods of comparative research, content analysis, history research and so on, to study the existing different legislative attitudes and theoretical problems involved in the origin, development, progress and perfection of the inheritance agreement system. In order to understand deeply the necessity and feasibility of establishing this system in our country with the legal theory as the starting point and the judicial practice as the starting point the author puts forward the legislative conception suitable for the development of our country and makes up for the vacuum zone existing in the current inheritance law. The author divides this article into four parts to discuss the succession agreement system. First of all, it discusses the general theory of succession agreement, including the concept of succession agreement, the legal characteristics of succession agreement and its historical evolution. Referring to the specific legislation regulation of the country with positive legislative attitude, this paper puts forward the idea of constructing the inheritance agreement system in our country. Then, the necessity and feasibility of establishing succession agreement system in China are demonstrated. This chapter compares the inheritance agreement system with the legacy maintenance agreement and the common will, demonstrates the defects of the legacy maintenance agreement and the common will system, and combines the traditional inheritance custom and the historical and cultural background of our country. This paper studies and analyzes the feasibility of establishing succession agreement system in China. At the end of the article, it mainly discusses the legislative conception of establishing succession agreement system. In this paper, the author combines the needs of China's actual situation and inheritance habits with the relevant foreign legislation, and puts forward some legislative suggestions on the establishment of succession agreement system in China, in order to make up for the gaps in relevant legislation. At the same time, it also provides some legal basis for judicial work.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李德勇;;繼承人如何支取被繼承人的存款[J];農(nóng)家科技;2006年08期

2 榮成;;繼承人有清償被繼承人電費(fèi)義務(wù)嗎?[J];農(nóng)電管理;2006年10期

3 李景林 ,熊裕武;試論被繼承人債務(wù)的清償[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);1986年01期

4 李玉珍;;繼承人以外對被繼承人扶養(yǎng)較多的人辦理取得遺產(chǎn)公證的問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;1992年04期

5 ;繼承人應(yīng)否承擔(dān)被繼承人生前的個人債務(wù)[J];黨員之友;1998年03期

6 榮成;對一起清償被繼承人電費(fèi)債務(wù)糾紛案的評析[J];農(nóng)村電工;2005年02期

7 劉淑珍;被繼承人個人的財產(chǎn)才能繼承[J];人民司法;1985年04期

8 楊震;;關(guān)于限制被繼承人生前贈與行為問題的探討[J];法學(xué)研究;1988年05期

9 ;法定繼承人可以撤銷被繼承人的贈與嗎?[J];山西老年;2012年01期

10 ;如何認(rèn)定繼承人虐待被繼承人情節(jié)是否嚴(yán)重[J];伴侶(A版);2002年08期

相關(guān)會議論文 前3條

1 倪曉晶;;淺析遺產(chǎn)債權(quán)清償責(zé)任若干問題[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（2008年第4輯）[C];2008年

2 蔣超;倪s，

本文編號：2043793