本文選題：個人信息 + 個人信息權(quán)��； 參考：《海南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著信息技術(shù)的發(fā)展與進(jìn)步,個人信息作為市場經(jīng)濟(jì)中新興的社會資源愈發(fā)重要。我國政府也已經(jīng)將其列入立法計劃,本文主要探討了個人信息民事立法研究相關(guān)問題。 第一部分論述了個人信息與個人信息權(quán),個人信息主要包括特定個人的客觀信息以及帶有公信力的主觀信息。個人信息權(quán)是指自然人對其本人信息依法享有的占有、支配、控制并排除其他人侵害的權(quán)利。文章認(rèn)為其具有兩種屬性,即人格權(quán)和財產(chǎn)權(quán)。 第二部分闡述了我國個人信息民事立法方面目前的情況,通過文獻(xiàn)回顧總結(jié)了存在以下問題：一是目前的民事法律中對個人信息權(quán)規(guī)定不確切；二是個人信息財產(chǎn)權(quán)屬性不明確；三是個人信息侵權(quán)救濟(jì)方式不明確。 第三部分文章著重闡述個人信息在國外的立法情況,美國主要是以行業(yè)自律為主導(dǎo)；歐盟則以法律規(guī)制為主導(dǎo)�！八街梢怨ビ瘛蓖ㄟ^對美國和歐盟立法實(shí)踐的分析,有一些經(jīng)驗(yàn)可以為我國所借鑒,一是應(yīng)合理平衡個人信息保護(hù)與個人信息流通的關(guān)系,二是立法保護(hù)應(yīng)與自律保護(hù)和技術(shù)保護(hù)相結(jié)合。 第四部分論述了我國應(yīng)采用何種模式制定個人信息民事方面的法律。我國個人信息民事立法原則應(yīng)該包括目的明確、目的限制、安全、保密以及保障流通和適當(dāng)限制五個原則。以及有關(guān)民事立法的兩項(xiàng)具體內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:With the development and progress of information technology, personal information is becoming more and more important as a new social resource in market economy. Our government has also included it in the legislative plan. This paper mainly discusses the relevant issues of the civil legislation of personal information. The first part discusses the right of personal information and personal information. Personal information mainly includes the objective information of a specific individual and subjective information with credibility. The right of personal information refers to the right of natural persons to possess, dominate, control and exclude the infringement of their own information according to law. The article thinks that it has two kinds of attribute, namely personality right and property right. The second part expounds the current situation of the civil legislation of personal information in China, and summarizes the following problems through literature review: first, the current civil law on the right to personal information is not accurate; The property right of personal information is not clear, and the remedy of personal information infringement is not clear. The third part focuses on the legislation of personal information in foreign countries. The United States is mainly dominated by industry self-discipline, while the European Union is dominated by legal regulation. Through the analysis of the legislative practice of the United States and the European Union, there are some experiences that can be used for reference by our country. First, the relationship between the protection of personal information and the circulation of personal information should be reasonably balanced. Second, legislative protection should be combined with self-regulation protection and technical protection. The fourth part discusses the mode that our country should adopt to make the civil law of personal information. The principles of civil legislation of personal information in China should include five principles: clear purpose, restriction of purpose, security, confidentiality, guarantee of circulation and appropriate restriction. And the two specific contents of civil legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利明;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下人格權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年04期

2 王利明;;人格權(quán)法的發(fā)展與完善——以人格尊嚴(yán)的保護(hù)為視角[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2012年04期

3 賀栩栩;;比較法上的個人數(shù)據(jù)信息自決權(quán)[J];比較法研究;2013年02期

4 齊愛民;中華人民共和國個人信息保護(hù)法示范法草案學(xué)者建議稿[J];河北法學(xué);2005年06期

5 湯擎;試論個人數(shù)據(jù)與相關(guān)的法律關(guān)系[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年05期

6 李巧玲;;論個人信息之財產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年10期

7 李建偉;鄭其斌;;論人格信息財產(chǎn)權(quán)——附著于人格要素的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的定位與保護(hù)[J];河南社會科學(xué);2009年04期

8 劉德良;;個人信息的財產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年03期

9 陳樹艷;;個人信息的權(quán)利屬性及立法價值取向的民法解析[J];理論月刊;2011年05期

10 許紅纓;余翔;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代個人信息財產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];老區(qū)建設(shè);2012年10期

，

本文編號：2038151