本文選題：思想表達兩分法 + 事實問題��； 參考：《知識產(chǎn)權(quán)》2017年09期

【摘要】：思想表達兩分法是法律問題,思想與表達的界分是事實問題;前者蘊含價值判斷,后者與價值無涉;前者是法官在裁判時加以裁量,后者由當(dāng)事人舉證證明。法官在裁判過程中應(yīng)區(qū)分法律問題與事實問題,避免將法律問題中的價值判斷帶進事實問題的證明中。雖然存在思想與表達難以界分的情況,但思想與表達的界分確實客觀存在。著作權(quán)法應(yīng)堅守思想表達兩分法,并在著作權(quán)法司法實踐中不斷豐富和發(fā)展思想與表達的界分方法,以期實現(xiàn)著作權(quán)法的立法目的。
[Abstract]:The thought expression of two points is a legal problem, the boundary of thought and expression is a fact problem; the former contains value judgment, the latter is not related to the value; the former is the judge when it is judged in the referee, the latter is proved by the litigant. The judge should distinguish between the legal and the facts in the process of refereeing, and avoid the value judgment in the legal question. In the proof of the problem of entering the fact, although there is a situation that the thought and expression are difficult to divide, the boundary of thought and expression exists objectively. The copyright law should stick to the thought expression of the dual law, and enrich and develop the dividing method of thought and expression in the judicial practice of copyright law, in order to realize the legislative purpose of the copyright law.
【作者單位】： 對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)中國企業(yè)“走出去”協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心科研項目(項目批準(zhǔn)號:201501YY001A)研究成果
【分類號】：D913

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王驍;;淺析思想表達二分法[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年09期

2 盧海君;;論思想表達兩分法的“成文”化[J];中國出版;2010年21期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐天一;手機游戲的著作權(quán)保護分析[D];北京交通大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號：2000680