發(fā)布時間：2018-06-08 06:19

  本文選題：原因 + 有因行為　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：以一個法律行為是否與其內(nèi)在的原因相互依存作為判定依據(jù),將法律行為劃分成有因行為與無因行為兩類。有因法律行為與無因法律行為的區(qū)分對于民事法律關(guān)系的判斷,市場交易費用的降低,保障交易的安全穩(wěn)定,市場經(jīng)濟水平的安全有序發(fā)展,發(fā)揮著十分關(guān)鍵的影響。但在現(xiàn)有的理論研究中,有因行為與無因行為二者行為應(yīng)如何區(qū)分、體系應(yīng)如何確定以及權(quán)利失衡的一方應(yīng)如何救濟等問題沒有明確清楚的規(guī)定。本文由引言、正文、結(jié)論三大部分構(gòu)成,在區(qū)分二者概念、內(nèi)涵的基礎(chǔ)上,分析內(nèi)在二者內(nèi)在含義的不同,對行為背后的“原因”進行了剖析,并對二者的類型進行了歸納,并提出了程序法中的不同要求。引言部分,筆者交代了目前有關(guān)法律行為制度、有因行為、無因行為的研究現(xiàn)狀,闡釋了本文之研究對象、研究方法及研究目的。正文第一部分探討了有因行為、無因行為二者概念的分野。通過查閱法國、德國及我國的相關(guān)規(guī)定,對二者的概念進行了分析,結(jié)合法律行為理論中“原因”的含義,提出了有因行為與無因行為內(nèi)在原因的不同。正文第二部分進一步分析了對二者進行區(qū)分的價值依據(jù)。通過三人社會理論的思考,分別提出了有因行為、無因行為的價值考量與利益平衡。筆者通過對二者進行比較,分析得出二者的區(qū)分,提出無因行為理論具有促進交易,增強財富流通性的價值,并為我們提供了一種具有固有價值的精湛的民法方法和民法思維。在此基礎(chǔ)之上,正文第三部分對有因行為、無因行為的類型進行了總結(jié)歸納。正文最后一部分結(jié)合民事訴訟法提出了二者在程序法中的不同之處,通過典型案例的分析,對二者在證明對象、舉證責(zé)任、證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等方面的不同進行了分析。結(jié)論部分是對全文的總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the interdependence of a legal act and its internal causes, the legal act is divided into two categories: the causative act and the non-cause act. Because of the distinction between legal acts and non-cause legal acts, the judgment of civil legal relations, the reduction of market transaction costs, the security and stability of transactions, and the safe and orderly development of the level of market economy play a very important role in the judgment of civil legal relations. However, in the existing theoretical research, there are no clear provisions on how to distinguish the behavior of cause behavior from non-cause behavior, how to determine the system and how to remedy the party whose rights are out of balance. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. On the basis of distinguishing the concepts and connotations of the two, the paper analyzes the difference of the intrinsic meanings of the two, analyzes the "reasons" behind the behavior, and sums up the types of the two. And put forward the different requirements in the procedural law. In the foreword, the author explains the current research situation of the legal act system, the cause act and the non-cause act, and explains the research object, the research method and the purpose of this paper. The first part of the text discusses the distinction between the concept of causative behavior and non-cause behavior. By referring to the relevant provisions of France, Germany and our country, this paper analyzes the concepts of the two concepts, and puts forward the difference between the internal reasons of the cause act and the non-cause act according to the meaning of "cause" in the theory of legal act. The second part of the text further analyzes the value basis of the distinction between the two. Through the consideration of the three-person social theory, this paper puts forward the value consideration and the benefit balance of the cause-based behavior and the non-cause behavior respectively. By comparing the two, the author points out that the theory of non-cause behavior has the value of promoting transaction and strengthening the circulation of wealth, and provides us with an exquisite method of civil law and thinking of civil law with inherent value. On this basis, the third part of the text summarizes the types of cause-based behavior and non-cause behavior. The last part of the text puts forward the difference between the two in the procedural law combined with the civil procedure law. Through the analysis of typical cases, this paper analyzes the differences in the object of proof, the burden of proof, the standard of proof and so on. The conclusion part is a summary of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 徐滌宇;無因性原則之考古[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

2 田士永;;《物權(quán)法》中物權(quán)行為理論之辨析[J];法學(xué);2008年12期

3 熊志海;訴訟證明的客觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與主觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2000年05期

4 徐滌宇;物權(quán)行為無因性理論之目的論解釋[J];中國法學(xué);2005年02期

，

本文編號：1994902