本文選題：職務(wù)作品 + 著作權(quán)歸屬制度　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：作品作為人類文化的載體和結(jié)晶之一,一直被視為作者思想、情感的表達(dá)以及人格、智慧的體現(xiàn)。我國(guó)著作權(quán)法中規(guī)定的作品涵蓋了自然人作品、職務(wù)作品、法人作品、委托作品及合作作品。在我國(guó),著作權(quán)法往往傾向于保護(hù)作品的財(cái)力投入者而非創(chuàng)作者,未能發(fā)揮著作權(quán)本應(yīng)具有的保護(hù)作者人格屬性的作用,這在實(shí)際生產(chǎn)生活中非常不利于保護(hù)作者利益,不利于鼓勵(lì)創(chuàng)作作品,也不利于優(yōu)秀作品的產(chǎn)生。我國(guó)在規(guī)定職務(wù)作品的同時(shí)還規(guī)定了法人作品,兩種作品在構(gòu)成要件上的共通性太強(qiáng),存在著一些交叉或沖突,造成了司法實(shí)踐中難以區(qū)分的困境。本文基于職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)的相關(guān)基本理論,明晰界定了職務(wù)作品的概念和法律特征,在職務(wù)作品及相關(guān)作品間進(jìn)行了辨識(shí)區(qū)分;然后梳理總結(jié)當(dāng)前我國(guó)職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度存在的問(wèn)題;再結(jié)合兩大法系和國(guó)際條約中對(duì)職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度的立法實(shí)踐,從而得出完善我國(guó)職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度的啟示。本文正文部分主要分為以下四個(gè)部分:第一部分為“職務(wù)作品概念的界定”。比較不同國(guó)家、地區(qū)的職務(wù)作品涵義,并對(duì)職務(wù)作品的法律特征進(jìn)行了整合,由此明晰界定了職務(wù)作品概念。第二部分為“我國(guó)職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度存在的問(wèn)題”。在梳理、論述當(dāng)前我國(guó)職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度現(xiàn)狀及相關(guān)法律規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,整理和剖析我國(guó)職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度中存在的法律問(wèn)題。第三部分為“職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度比較”。主要運(yùn)用實(shí)證分析的方法對(duì)英美法系、大陸法系的國(guó)家、地區(qū)和國(guó)際條約中職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度的立法淵源和司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行解析,得出啟示。第四部分為“我國(guó)職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度的完善”。通過(guò)闡述把握著作權(quán)歸屬制度問(wèn)題需要遵循的激勵(lì)原則、利益平衡原則,提出完善我國(guó)職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬制度的建議。
[Abstract]:As the carrier and crystallization of human culture, the works have been regarded as the author's thought, the expression of emotion, and the embodiment of personality and wisdom. The works stipulated in the copyright law of China cover the works of natural people, job works, legal works, entrusted works and cooperative works. In our country, copyright law tends to protect the financial investment of the works. The entry, not the creator, can not play the role of the copyright protection of the author's personality, which is very bad for the protection of the author's interests in the actual production and life, is not conducive to encouraging the creation of the works, and is not conducive to the production of excellent works. There are some intersections or conflicts on the essentials, and there are some difficulties in the judicial practice. Based on the basic theory of the copyright of the job works, this paper clearly defines the concept and the legal characteristics of the job works, and makes a distinction between the job works and the related works, and then combs and summarizes the current China. The existing problems of the ownership system of the copyright of the job works; and then combining the legislative practice of the system of the ownership of the copyright of the job works in the two legal systems and international treaties, so as to draw the inspiration to improve the system of the ownership of the copyright of the job works in our country. The main part of this article is divided into the following four parts: the first part is the concept of "job works" Comparing the meaning of the job works in different countries and regions, and integrating the legal features of the job works, the concept of the job works is clearly defined. The second part is "the existing problems of the ownership system of the copyright works in our country". On the basis of the law, the legal problems in the system of ownership of copyright works in China are arranged and analyzed. The third part is "the comparison of the ownership system of the copyright of the job works". The main use of the empirical analysis method is to legislation of the copyright ownership system of the Office works in the Anglo American legal system, the national, regional and international treaties of the continental law system. The fourth part is "the perfection of the system of the ownership of copyright works in our country". Through the exposition of the incentive principles and the principle of interest balance, the suggestions for improving the ownership system of the copyright work in our country are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 張曉玲;張莎莎;;職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)歸屬探析[J];科技與法律;2005年03期

2 韓續(xù)峰;;淺析職務(wù)作品的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];新西部(下半月);2008年02期

3 馮曉青,劉淑華;試論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的私權(quán)屬性及其公權(quán)化趨向[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2004年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1984926