本文選題：公眾人物 + 隱私權��； 參考：《南昌大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隱私權是現代眾多國家中公民普遍享有的一項重要的人格權。以美國為代表的許多國家均對公民的隱私權給予了嚴格的保護。我國《侵權責任法》雖然將隱私權單獨納入了法律保護的范疇，但我國對隱私權的法律保護體系尚未形成，立法規(guī)定不完善、不明確，司法實踐中大多以侵犯名譽權、人格權名義來進行保護，這使得很難做到對隱私權的最大程度的保護。 公眾人物作為自然人必然也享有隱私權。然而,公眾人物又是一個特殊的社會群體,其隱私權與公共利益和公眾合理興趣的沖突不可避免,特別是在當今傳媒信息技術日新月異的社會條件下,這種沖突有越來越多,越來越激烈的趨勢。因此,如何在對公眾人物隱私權進行合理限制的前提下,加強對公眾人物隱私權的保護，，成為法學界研究的熱點之一。 本文立足于對隱私權的界定和對隱私權與相關理論的研究,通過對公眾人物及其隱私權特殊性的分析,以說明公眾人物的隱私權應當受到合理的限制和保護。同時基于我國公眾人物隱私權限制和保護的法律現狀,就進一步完善公眾人物隱私權立法提出建議,以期能夠對公眾人物隱私權保護起到積極作用。
[Abstract]:The right to privacy is an important personality right enjoyed by citizens in many modern countries. Many countries, represented by the United States, have given strict protection to the privacy of their citizens. Although the tort liability law of our country has brought the right of privacy into the scope of the legal protection separately, the legal protection system of the right of privacy has not yet been formed in our country, the legislative provisions are not perfect and clear, and the judicial practice mostly infringes the right of reputation. The right of personality is protected in name, which makes it difficult to protect the right of privacy to the greatest extent. Public figures as natural persons must also enjoy the right to privacy. However, public figures are also a special social group, whose right to privacy conflicts with the public interest and reasonable public interest is inevitable, especially in today's media and information technology changing social conditions, such conflicts have become more and more, A growing trend. Therefore, how to strengthen the protection of the privacy of public figures on the premise of reasonable restrictions on the privacy of public figures has become one of the hot topics in the field of law. Based on the definition of the right to privacy and the study of the privacy and related theories, this paper analyzes the particularity of the public personage and its privacy, in order to explain that the privacy of the public figure should be reasonably restricted and protected. At the same time, based on the current legal situation of the restriction and protection of the privacy of public figures in our country, some suggestions are put forward to further improve the legislation of the privacy of public figures in order to play a positive role in the protection of the privacy of public figures.
【學位授予單位】：南昌大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 毛賀祺;;媒體報道中對公眾人物的侵權現象分析[J];今傳媒;2013年01期

2 楊立新;關于隱私權及其法律保護的幾個問題[J];人民檢察;2000年01期

3 曹越;從范志毅敗訴看輿論監(jiān)督中“公眾人物”的名譽權問題[J];新聞戰(zhàn)線;2003年06期

4 李玉萍;論公訴裁量中的公共利益衡量[J];政法論叢;2005年01期

5 李新天;鄭鳴;;論中國公眾人物隱私權的構建[J];中國法學;2005年05期

6 何少峰;試論公眾人物的隱私權[J];浙江青年專修學院學報;2004年02期

本文編號：1945984