本文選題：涉外貼牌生產(chǎn) + 商標(biāo)使用　； 參考：《華僑大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀決定了涉外貼牌生產(chǎn)的存在,但與之相關(guān)的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)糾紛卻成為其中的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素。其典型的糾紛情形為:在涉外貼牌生產(chǎn)中,如果所加工貼附著的商標(biāo),在國內(nèi)相同或類似商品上已經(jīng)有相同或類似的注冊商標(biāo),那么國內(nèi)的商標(biāo)權(quán)利人往往會對貼牌生產(chǎn)廠商提出商標(biāo)侵權(quán)指控。我國的理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界關(guān)于貼牌生產(chǎn)廠商的商標(biāo)貼附加工行為是否構(gòu)成商標(biāo)侵權(quán),一直有著不同的態(tài)度,這類判決的不確定性很大程度阻礙了我國貼牌生產(chǎn)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展。隨著2013年《商標(biāo)法》的修訂出臺及一些解讀文章的發(fā)表,可以說方向在逐漸明朗化,但仍然未出臺正式的司法解釋。針對于此,本文進(jìn)行了深入的分析,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了自己的觀點(diǎn)。本文的主要內(nèi)容有四部分:除了引言,第一部分簡述了貼牌生產(chǎn)的概念及其法律性質(zhì),通過同案不同判的案例引出目前對涉外貼牌生產(chǎn)是否構(gòu)成商標(biāo)侵權(quán)的完全相反的觀點(diǎn)及爭議焦點(diǎn);第二部分,比較論證域外相關(guān)規(guī)定和判例,總結(jié)域外類似規(guī)定及法理依據(jù);第三部分,分析我國涉外貼牌生產(chǎn)中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)判定的理論依據(jù),包括商標(biāo)侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)原則和商標(biāo)侵權(quán)的構(gòu)成要件,著重分析商標(biāo)法上“使用”這一概念和混淆可能性原則,提出商標(biāo)是否構(gòu)成“使用”應(yīng)該根據(jù)作用對象不同而有所區(qū)分的觀點(diǎn),認(rèn)為貼牌生產(chǎn)不構(gòu)成對國內(nèi)商標(biāo)專用權(quán)的侵犯,并指明我國涉外貼牌審判實(shí)務(wù)中存在的不足之處;第四部分,針對我國法律的滯后以及實(shí)踐中的缺失,提出完善相關(guān)法律和改進(jìn)執(zhí)法制度的建議,最后是結(jié)語。
[Abstract]:The status quo of China's economic development determines the existence of foreign label production, but the related trademark infringement disputes become the risk factor. The typical disputes are as follows: in the production of foreign stickers, if the trademark that is processed and affixed to it already has the same or similar registered trademark on the same or similar goods in the country, Then the domestic trademark owners often put forward trademark infringement charges against the manufacturers. There have always been different attitudes in the theoretical and practical circles on whether the trademark affixing and processing behavior of the label manufacturers constitutes trademark infringement. The uncertainty of this kind of judgment greatly hinders the development of the label industry in our country. With the revision of the Trademark Law in 2013 and the publication of some reading articles, it can be said that the direction is becoming more and more clear, but there is still no formal judicial interpretation. In view of this, this article carries on the thorough analysis, and puts forward own viewpoint on this basis. The main contents of this paper are as follows: in addition to the introduction, the first part briefly describes the concept and legal nature of label production. Through the case of different judgments in the same case, the author draws the opposite view and the focus of dispute about whether the production of foreign label is the infringement of trademark. The second part, compares and demonstrates the relevant provisions and precedents, summarizes the similar provisions and legal basis of the foreign countries. The third part analyzes the theoretical basis of trademark infringement judgment in the production of foreign label, including the principle of imputation of trademark infringement and the constitutive elements of trademark infringement, focusing on the concept of "use" and the possibility of confusion in trademark law. The author points out that whether trademark constitutes "use" should be differentiated according to the different objects of action, thinks that the production of trademark does not constitute an infringement of the exclusive right of trademark in China, and points out the deficiencies in the trial practice of foreign trademark stickers in our country. The fourth part, aiming at the lag of our country's law and the deficiency in practice, puts forward some suggestions to perfect the relevant laws and improve the law enforcement system, and finally, the conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.43
，

本文編號：1911472