本文選題：人工智能 + 人工智能生成內(nèi)容��； 參考：《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)》2017年03期

【摘要】：人工智能在新聞和視覺(jué)藝術(shù)領(lǐng)域參與創(chuàng)作活動(dòng)的現(xiàn)象雖然在如今已成常態(tài),但如何認(rèn)定由此生成內(nèi)容的可版權(quán)性及其權(quán)利歸屬,在法律上卻并未形成統(tǒng)一意見(jiàn)。作為非自然人和法人的人工智能首次成為內(nèi)容來(lái)源后,如果將該內(nèi)容認(rèn)定為受著作權(quán)法保護(hù)的作品,必將沖擊傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)的客體認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和權(quán)利歸屬原則,引發(fā)權(quán)利變動(dòng)和侵權(quán)認(rèn)定規(guī)則的全面混亂。作為激勵(lì)"理性人"創(chuàng)作和傳播的制度工具,著作權(quán)法無(wú)法脫離從移植自有體物財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的制度體系和主客體不得互換的基本私法原理,因而圍繞創(chuàng)作者和投資者構(gòu)建的制度設(shè)計(jì)不應(yīng)也無(wú)法因人工智能而被顛覆。作為遵循人工智能軟件設(shè)計(jì)者意志創(chuàng)作的產(chǎn)物,人工智能生成內(nèi)容的結(jié)果不但仍可由獨(dú)創(chuàng)性判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來(lái)認(rèn)定,權(quán)利歸屬也應(yīng)借鑒早已存在且運(yùn)作成熟的法人作品制度安排,將人工智能的所有者視為著作權(quán)人。
[Abstract]:Although the phenomenon of artificial intelligence participating in creative activities in the field of news and visual arts has become the norm nowadays, there is no unified opinion on how to determine the copyright of the resulting content and its right attribution. As a non-natural person and legal person, artificial intelligence has become the content source for the first time. If the content is regarded as a work protected by copyright law, it will certainly impact on the standard of object recognition and the principle of ownership of rights of traditional copyright. Causes the right change and the infringement confirmation rule the complete confusion. As an institutional tool to encourage the creation and dissemination of "rational people", copyright law cannot be divorced from the institutional system of transplanting property rights to its own objects and the basic private law principle that subject and object cannot be interchangeable. So the institutions built around creators and investors should not and cannot be subverted by artificial intelligence. As a result of the will creation of artificial intelligence software designer, the result of the content generated by artificial intelligence can still be determined by the criterion of originality, and the ownership of rights should also draw lessons from the institutional arrangement of legal person's works, which already exist and operate mature. The owner of artificial intelligence is regarded as the copyright owner.
【作者單位】： 華中科技大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：司法部法治與法學(xué)理論研究項(xiàng)目“3D打印行為的著作權(quán)規(guī)制研究”(14SFB30027)的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郝春莉;關(guān)于我國(guó)著作權(quán)合理使用問(wèn)題的探討[J];中國(guó)人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1995年04期

2 姚琦;清末著作權(quán)立法初探[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年04期

3 梁成意,周念軍;著作權(quán)利用制度的比較研究[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年04期

4 王軍麗;推進(jìn)著作權(quán)的合理使用:美國(guó)的規(guī)范與現(xiàn)狀[J];圖書(shū)館建設(shè);2005年03期

5 周安平;簡(jiǎn)禎;;著作權(quán)視野下的中小學(xué)教輔書(shū)侵權(quán)探究[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2006年03期

6 沈仁干;;艱辛、喜悅與期盼——改革開(kāi)放中的著作權(quán)立法[J];中國(guó)出版;2008年10期

7 劉鐵光;;著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域經(jīng)營(yíng)反侵權(quán)的法律與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];河北學(xué)刊;2008年06期

8 沈仁干;;改革開(kāi)放中的著作權(quán)立法[J];編輯之友;2008年06期

9 翟志宏;;有關(guān)清末著作權(quán)律的兩個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

10 索O啂，

本文編號(hào)：1910851