本文選題：醫(yī)療美容侵權(quán) + 歸責(zé)原則��； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：醫(yī)療美容行為,是借助醫(yī)學(xué)技術(shù)方法對(duì)人身進(jìn)行的修復(fù)與再塑的活動(dòng),這里的醫(yī)學(xué)技術(shù)方法包括手術(shù)、藥物、醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品等醫(yī)用藥物。生活中如隆鼻術(shù)、祛疤痕、面部除皺、紋眉、拉雙眼皮、削腮和抽脂術(shù)都屬于醫(yī)療美容的范疇。醫(yī)療美容損害賠償責(zé)任是侵權(quán)責(zé)任與違約責(zé)任的競(jìng)合,比較起來(lái)提起侵權(quán)之訴更有利于維護(hù)美容受損者的自身合法權(quán)益。我國(guó)目前尚無(wú)關(guān)于醫(yī)療美容糾紛處理的統(tǒng)一法律依據(jù)。筆者在文中通過(guò)對(duì)一般醫(yī)療行為及醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)概念的分析,論證了醫(yī)療美容機(jī)構(gòu)屬于醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu),醫(yī)療美容屬于醫(yī)療行為。可以適用《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》關(guān)于醫(yī)療損害賠償責(zé)任的相關(guān)規(guī)定來(lái)解決醫(yī)療美容侵權(quán)問(wèn)題。醫(yī)療美容侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)應(yīng)根據(jù)醫(yī)療美容機(jī)構(gòu)的不同性質(zhì)、區(qū)別對(duì)待,采取不同的歸責(zé)方式。在文中還提到了應(yīng)該如何分析醫(yī)療美容機(jī)構(gòu)過(guò)失、采用什么樣的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)去認(rèn)定醫(yī)療美容機(jī)構(gòu)的過(guò)失,用以豐富我國(guó)侵權(quán)責(zé)任中的過(guò)失責(zé)任理論。在文章的結(jié)尾還談到了醫(yī)療美容損害賠償責(zé)任的確定、承擔(dān),提出了在醫(yī)療美容侵權(quán)中可以適用懲罰性賠償?shù)木唧w情形以及在適用懲罰性賠償時(shí)應(yīng)該參考的因素。
[Abstract]:Medical cosmetic behavior is an activity of repairing and remolding a person by means of medical techniques, including surgery, medicine, medical products and other medical drugs. Life such as nasal augmentation, scar removal, facial wrinkle, eyebrow, eyelid pulling, cheek cutting and liposuction are medical beauty areas. Medical beauty damage compensation liability is the concurrence of tort liability and breach of contract liability. There is no unified legal basis for the treatment of medical and cosmetic disputes in China. By analyzing the general medical behavior and the concept of medical institutions, the author demonstrates that medical beauty institutions belong to medical institutions and medical beauty institutions belong to medical behaviors. The tort liability law can be applied to solve the medical beauty tort problem. The imputation of medical beauty infringement should be treated differently and adopt different imputation methods according to the different nature of medical beauty institution. In this paper, the author also points out how to analyze the malpractice of medical and cosmetic institutions and what kind of standard should be adopted to identify the negligence of medical and beauty institutions in order to enrich the theory of fault liability in tort liability in our country. At the end of the article, it also discusses the determination and undertaking of the liability for medical beauty damages, and puts forward the specific circumstances in which punitive damages can be applied in medical beauty infringement and the factors that should be taken into account when applying punitive damages.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊冬;;醫(yī)療美容損害賠償問(wèn)題研究[J];才智;2012年02期

2 趙西巨;;醫(yī)療過(guò)失與因果關(guān)系之認(rèn)定:英美法中的理論與具體規(guī)則[J];東方法學(xué);2011年01期

3 張鵬博,錢(qián)翠華;醫(yī)療美容事故精神損害賠償——兼談最高人民法院精神損害賠償司法解釋的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義[J];法律適用(國(guó)家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年08期

4 楊立新;;醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任構(gòu)成要件的具體判斷[J];法律適用;2012年04期

5 鄭妙;譚智;;對(duì)醫(yī)療美容損害賠償適用消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法的質(zhì)疑[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年01期

6 李贏天;;醫(yī)療美容損害賠償研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年21期

7 丹子軍;沈霞;;淺議醫(yī)療整形美容糾紛及防范策略[J];現(xiàn)代醫(yī)院管理;2010年02期

8 景雨陽(yáng);;試析醫(yī)療美容行業(yè)中的亂象與監(jiān)管缺位[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年03期

9 黃靜紅;;美容心理學(xué)在醫(yī)學(xué)美容中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)美容醫(yī)學(xué);2011年12期

10 李雄;;醫(yī)療美容:水漲船更高[J];醫(yī)學(xué)美學(xué)美容(財(cái)智);2011年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1892841