本文選題：構建 + 并存的債務承擔　； 參考：《中國海洋大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟全球化的大背景之下,日趨復雜的債權債務關系往往涉及第三人的利益,在此情況下,第三人參與債權債務關系的新模式應運而生----并存的債務承擔。并存的債務承擔作為債務承擔的一種,因其易于混淆而備受爭議,但是不管是從債務人的角度看,還是從債權人的角度看,亦或是從民法公平正義的角度看,并存的債務承擔都有其存在的必要性。完善的債務承擔制度不僅能夠平衡債的關系各方當事人的利益,更能為全球化大背景下經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展創(chuàng)造良好的社會氛圍。如何加快新形勢下有關并存的債務承擔制度的立法成為當務之急。想要清晰界定并存的債務承擔,必須經(jīng)過慎重分析。關于“并存的債務承擔”,學界對其理解存在著諸多爭議。對并存的債務承擔的認定,應從保護債權人的利益出發(fā),兼顧債務人、第三人的利益,保證相對公平。本文主要從三個角度研究了并存的債務承擔制度：首先是對并存的債務承擔制度的基本理論進行了闡述,在這一部分比較重要的是并存的債務承擔的構成要件；然后是對并存的債務承擔制度與其他相似的制度進行了辨析,辨析的目的是希望立法機關能夠盡快將并存的債務承擔制度單獨立法,這樣,就不會再和其他相似的制度發(fā)生混淆。第三人的行為對于債權人或者債務人是可能存在著風險的,所以必然要有十分嚴格的成立要求；最后明晰并存的債務承擔制度社會價值,研究了并存的債務承擔在成立后對原債權債務關系的效力以及對債權人、債務人和第三人的效力,在這個部分傾注了筆者的心血。研究此制度主要采取的是一種辨析的方法,即就并存的債務承擔制度與其他相似的制度的具體內(nèi)容加以闡述,然后分析異同點,從客觀的角度出發(fā),闡述出自己支持的觀點或者提出新的觀點,最后得出自己的結(jié)論。之所以研究并存的債務承擔制度,是希望能夠在前輩們的理論基礎上尋求一個更加清晰的結(jié)論,同時,也希望能夠為彌補立法空白提供一些有價值的參考建議,以后為這一制度在實踐中的適用奠定堅實的基礎。
[Abstract]:Under the background of economic globalization, the increasingly complex relationship between creditor's rights and liabilities often involves the interests of the third party. In this case, the new model of the third party's participation in the relationship of creditor's rights and liabilities emerges as the times require-the coexistence of debt commitment. As a kind of debt commitment, the coexistence of debt commitment is controversial because it is easy to be confused. However, it is not only from the perspective of the debtor, but also from the perspective of creditors, or from the perspective of justice and fairness of civil law. The coexistence of debt commitment has its necessity. A perfect debt bearing system can not only balance the interests of the parties involved in the debt, but also create a good social atmosphere for the economic development under the background of globalization. How to speed up the legislation on the coexistence of debt commitment system under the new situation has become an urgent matter. To clearly define a concurrent debt commitment, it must be carefully analyzed. There are many controversies on the understanding of the coexistence of debt commitment. The determination of the concurrent debt commitment should be based on the protection of the creditor's interests and the interests of the debtor and the third party to ensure relative fairness. This article mainly from three angles to study the coexistence of debt commitment system: first of all, the coexistence of debt commitment system of the basic theory is expounded, in this part of the more important is the coexistence of debt commitment elements; The purpose of the analysis is to hope that the legislature can legislate the coexistence of the debt commitment system as soon as possible, so that the existing debt commitment system can be separately legislated as soon as possible. There would be no more confusion with other similar systems. The behavior of the third party is likely to be risky for the creditor or debtor, so there must be very strict requirements for its establishment; finally, the social value of the debt bearing system, which exists in clear coexistence, This paper studies the effectiveness of the existing debt commitment on the original creditor's rights and liabilities and on the creditors, the debtor and the third party. In this part, the author puts his efforts into it. The research on this system mainly adopts a discriminative method, that is, the concrete contents of the existing debt commitment system and other similar systems are expounded, and then the similarities and differences are analyzed, and the objective point of view is analyzed. State your own views or put forward new ideas, and finally draw your own conclusions. The reason for the study of the existing debt commitment system is to seek a clearer conclusion on the basis of the previous generation's theory, and at the same time, to provide some valuable reference suggestions for bridging the legislative gaps. In the future, it will lay a solid foundation for the application of this system in practice.
【學位授予單位】：中國海洋大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.6

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 蒲朝琦;;探析并存的債務承擔制度[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2013年04期

2 戴紅兵,陳發(fā)桂;債務承擔新探[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2001年04期

3 王建文;論死者生前債務承擔[J];南京化工大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年02期

4 胡健;;論免責債務承擔的構成要件及法律效果[J];當代經(jīng)理人;2005年03期

5 魯建法;一起借款糾紛案的剖析——企業(yè)改制過程中的債務承擔問題[J];西部論叢;2005年03期

6 張穎杰;萬良杰;;國企出售與債務承擔問題探討[J];商業(yè)時代;2007年03期

7 石濤鋒;尹曉健;;債務承擔若干法律問題研究及風險防范[J];河北金融;2007年08期

8 張振;;債務承擔的性質(zhì)認定問題研究[J];濰坊學院學報;2008年05期

9 張文青;;并存?zhèn)鶆粘袚睦碚撆c實踐研究[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年S1期

10 韓文濤;;債務加入的學理探究與實務辨析——以一則案例為視角[J];新余高專學報;2009年04期

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 無錫市北塘區(qū)人民法院 高鑫;債務承擔若干法律問題研究[N];商務時報;2008年

2 張秋婷　肖s，

本文編號：1873677