發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-05 06:30

  本文選題：專利間接侵權(quán) + 誘導(dǎo)侵權(quán)　； 參考：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：專利間接侵權(quán)將非專利產(chǎn)品歸入到專利權(quán)保護(hù)客體中,增強(qiáng)對(duì)專利權(quán)人保護(hù)的同時(shí),在一定程度上會(huì)產(chǎn)生壟斷行為,損害社會(huì)公眾群體的權(quán)益。因而自其誕生之日起就引起了對(duì)專利權(quán)人利益保護(hù)和對(duì)公共利益保護(hù)之間的博弈。我國(guó)目前尚缺乏對(duì)專利間接侵權(quán)的統(tǒng)一定論。2016年3月,最高法以司法解釋的形式規(guī)定了對(duì)專利間接侵權(quán)的處理意見(jiàn),引起了我國(guó)法學(xué)界的高度關(guān)注。雖然該解釋對(duì)專利間接侵權(quán)的行為類型、構(gòu)成要件、責(zé)任承擔(dān)等進(jìn)行了規(guī)定,但是該解釋只是給專利間接侵權(quán)制度提供了一個(gè)框架,并不能解決該制度在立法上的空白,并且在司法實(shí)踐中沒(méi)有設(shè)計(jì)相應(yīng)的具體保障措施。本文在我國(guó)現(xiàn)有法律的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)司法實(shí)踐中的案例,借鑒域外相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,對(duì)專利間接侵權(quán)進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的分析,提出從行為對(duì)象、行為方式、行為人主觀要件上規(guī)范專利間接侵權(quán)行為的構(gòu)成要件,為我國(guó)設(shè)立單獨(dú)的條款提供了參考。本文還從規(guī)范責(zé)任承擔(dān)、設(shè)立專業(yè)審理法院、給予不同行業(yè)間保護(hù)力度等方面,提出了完善該制度的若干保障措施。
[Abstract]:Indirect patent infringement classifies non-patented products into the object of patent protection, strengthens the protection of patentee, at the same time, it will produce monopoly behavior to a certain extent and damage the rights and interests of public groups. Therefore, the game between the protection of the patentee's interests and the protection of the public interests has arisen since its birth. At present, there is no unified conclusion on indirect patent infringement in China. In March 2016, the Supreme Law stipulated the opinions on the treatment of indirect patent infringement in the form of judicial interpretation, which has aroused great concern in the field of law in our country. Although the interpretation of indirect patent infringement of the types of acts, elements, liability and other provisions, but the interpretation of indirect patent infringement system to provide a framework, can not solve the legislative gaps in the system. And in judicial practice, there is no corresponding specific protection measures. On the basis of the existing laws of our country, combined with the cases in the domestic judicial practice, this paper makes a detailed analysis of the indirect infringement of patent by referring to the relevant laws and regulations outside the country, and puts forward the object of the act, the mode of the act, The subjective elements of the perpetrator regulate the constitution of indirect patent infringement, which provides a reference for the establishment of separate articles in our country. This paper also puts forward some safeguard measures to perfect the system from the aspects of standardizing the responsibility, setting up the specialized trial court and giving the strength of protection among different industries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許浩明;李捷;;論我國(guó)專利間接侵權(quán)制度的缺位與立法完善[J];河南工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

2 張玲;紀(jì)璐;;美國(guó)專利侵權(quán)懲罰性賠償制度及其啟示[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年02期

3 張玲;;論專利侵權(quán)賠償損失的歸責(zé)原則[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2012年02期

4 張通;劉筠筠;;我國(guó)專利間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則審視與思考[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2012年02期

5 楊萌;鄭志柱;;專利間接侵權(quán)與專利侵權(quán)判定原則[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年04期

6 熊文聰;;被誤讀的專利間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則——以美國(guó)法的變遷為線索[J];東方法學(xué);2011年01期

7 袁真富;;基于侵權(quán)抗辯之專利默示許可探究[J];法學(xué);2010年12期

8 李昌玉;;對(duì)我國(guó)專利間接侵權(quán)法律制度的反思[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

9 王凌紅;;我國(guó)專利間接侵權(quán)制度的立法方向——以利益平衡為視點(diǎn)求解《專利法》第三次修改的未決立法課題[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年06期

10 朱丹;;關(guān)于建立我國(guó)專利間接侵權(quán)制度的思考[J];人民司法;2009年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1846635