發(fā)布時間：2018-04-27 03:25

  本文選題：應(yīng)賠償損害 + 損害認(rèn)定論��； 參考：《河北法學(xué)》2017年05期

【摘要】：完全賠償作為侵權(quán)損害賠償之基本原則,并非真正意義上的對全部損害予以全額賠償?shù)脑瓌t。作為其賠償對象的損害是一個經(jīng)各類要素和條件過濾后的范疇,可稱之為"應(yīng)賠償損害"。該損害首先必須符合損害認(rèn)定時的質(zhì)、量要求,即損害之造成應(yīng)符合侵權(quán)構(gòu)成要件,且達(dá)到一定之嚴(yán)重程度;其后應(yīng)經(jīng)過損失分擔(dān)時的扣減,即通過損益同銷和過失相抵環(huán)節(jié),實現(xiàn)侵權(quán)人與受害人間責(zé)任的合理分配。這一過程雖借助損害之名,實際持有的卻是限制賠償?shù)哪康?是完全賠償為維持其基本原則地位而進(jìn)行的自我修正。
[Abstract]:As the basic principle of tort compensation, complete compensation is not the principle of full compensation for all damages. The damage as the object of compensation is a category filtered by various elements and conditions, which can be called "compensatory damage". The damage must first meet the quality and quantity requirements of the time the damage is determined, that is, the damage shall be caused in accordance with the constitutive requirements of the infringement and to a certain degree of severity; thereafter, the loss shall be reduced by the share of the loss, that is, the profit and loss shall be sold at the same time as the loss is sold and the fault shall be offset. To realize the reasonable distribution of responsibility between the infringer and the victim. Although this process depends on the name of damage, what it actually holds is the purpose of limiting compensation and the self-correction of complete compensation in order to maintain its basic status of principle.
【作者單位】： 福建社會科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所;
【基金】：2015年度國家社科基金西部項目《生態(tài)文明建設(shè)中環(huán)境人權(quán)的制度化研究》(15XZX020)
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 徐銀波;;論侵權(quán)損害完全賠償原則之緩和[J];法商研究;2013年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 盛洋;侵權(quán)損害完全賠償原則適用限制研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

2 朱桂龍;我國《合同法》第113條適用研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1808974