本文選題：著作權(quán) + 侵權(quán)判定��； 參考：《中國出版》2017年21期

【摘要】：對于著作權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定,司法實(shí)踐中常采用"接觸"加"實(shí)質(zhì)性相似"來加以判斷。實(shí)質(zhì)性相似判斷首先涉及了思想表達(dá)二分法的前提性判斷,其次關(guān)系到綜合運(yùn)用實(shí)質(zhì)性相似的判定方法。然而,對于作品實(shí)質(zhì)性相似的判斷實(shí)際操作起來卻異常困難。文章從"瓊瑤訴于正"一案談起,著重分析如何區(qū)分作品的思想與表達(dá),通過對比不同的實(shí)質(zhì)性相似判斷方法,分析使用的數(shù)量或比例不影響實(shí)質(zhì)性相似的認(rèn)定,并提出對實(shí)質(zhì)性相似判斷加以完善的建議。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, "contact" and "substantial similarity" are often used to judge copyright infringement. The judgment of substantial similarity involves, first, the leading judgment of the dichotomy of thought expression, and secondly, the comprehensive application of the judgment method of substantive similarity. However, the judgment of substantial similarity of works is extremely difficult to operate in practice. The article begins with the case of Qiong Yao v. Zheng, focusing on how to distinguish the thought and expression of the works. By comparing different methods of judging substantial similarity, the paper analyzes that the quantity or proportion used does not affect the determination of substantive similarity. And put forward to the substantial similar judgment to perfect the suggestion.
【作者單位】： 浙江工商大學(xué)法學(xué)院;浙江工商大學(xué)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)院;
【基金】：浙江省高校人文社科重點(diǎn)研究基地——浙江工商大學(xué)法學(xué)基地課題(2015A004)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D923.41
，

本文編號：1800341