發(fā)布時間：2018-04-21 20:48

  本文選題：虛假意思表示 + 惡意串通��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報》2017年06期

【摘要】：我國《民法總則》第146條、第153條和第154條分別規(guī)定了虛假意思表示、違背公序良俗和惡意串通損害他人利益的法律行為無效,導(dǎo)致這三種無效原因的關(guān)系出現(xiàn)混亂。實際上,虛假意思表示與惡意串通之情形應(yīng)包含于"違背善良風(fēng)俗"之范疇內(nèi)。從比較法上看,也無法找到單列惡意串通為法律行為無效原因之做法�；诖�,我國在具體的法律適用上,應(yīng)采用限縮原則解釋"惡意串通"和"虛假意思表示",擴大"善良風(fēng)俗"之適用范圍,使"違背公序良俗"成為認定虛假意思表示和惡意串通損害他人利益之"一般條款"。當三種無效原因"競合"時,賦予當事人選擇權(quán)。同時,該三條規(guī)范與我國《侵權(quán)責任法》第2條及第6條之規(guī)定出現(xiàn)法條競合時,也應(yīng)做技術(shù)性處理。
[Abstract]:In our country, the general rules of the civil law, the 146th articles, the 153rd and the 154th stipulates the false meaning, which are ineffective in violation of the public order, good customs and malicious collusion, which lead to the confusion of the relationship between the three invalid reasons. In fact, the case of the false meaning expression and the malevolent connection should be included in the "violation of good customs". On the basis of comparative law, it is impossible to find the cause of the invalid unilateral collusion as a reason for the invalid legal act. Based on this, China should use the principle of limited contraction to explain the "malicious collusion" and "false meaning expression" in the application of the specific law, expand the scope of the application of the "good custom" and make the "violation of public order and good custom" as a false meaning of identification and The "general clause" that malicious collusion damages the interests of others. When the three invalid reasons "concurrence", the parties shall be given the right to choose. At the same time, the three regulations should also be handled technically when the law article is competing with the provisions of the law of China, the law of tort, the second and the 6.

【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué);
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱勇;邵鋒;方煜文;;離婚前妻子將房產(chǎn)賤賣給父親 法院判決屬惡意串通交易無效[J];人民調(diào)解;2005年06期

2 劉璐;;惡意串通行為研究[J];法制與社會;2008年05期

3 劉峰;孔娜;;惡意串通行為研究[J];中外企業(yè)家;2009年10期

4 侯文博;;對民法上惡意串通的探討[J];法制與社會;2012年29期

5 ;是惡意串通進行欺詐,還是地方保護主義作崇?[J];法學(xué);1993年03期

6 朱建農(nóng);;論民法上惡意串通行為之效力[J];當代法學(xué);2007年06期

7 iJ洪逵;;瑞南公司訴香港萬事通公司等惡意串通共同借款到期不還案[J];中國法律;2000年01期

8 鄒艷娥;;惡意串通合同探析[J];企業(yè)家天地;2010年02期

9 熊o勖，

本文編號：1784041