本文選題：計(jì)算機(jī)字體 + 著作權(quán)��； 參考：《首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：進(jìn)入數(shù)字化時(shí)代后,我國(guó)的漢字也開始步入計(jì)算機(jī)字體時(shí)代,有了一定的發(fā)展,但是在發(fā)展的過(guò)程中也面臨著一些問(wèn)題,其中最引人注目的就是計(jì)算機(jī)字體的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題。隨著一系列字體侵權(quán)案的出現(xiàn),計(jì)算機(jī)字體的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題已經(jīng)成為專家學(xué)者們研究的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,各種觀點(diǎn)也是百花齊放,眾說(shuō)紛紜。計(jì)算機(jī)字體同常見(jiàn)的作品相比,其本身具有一定的特殊性。計(jì)算機(jī)字體不僅具有傳遞信息,交流情感的實(shí)用功能,同時(shí)某些新的字體又呈現(xiàn)出很強(qiáng)的藝術(shù)色彩,它是一種兼具實(shí)用與藝術(shù)性的作品。如今,計(jì)算機(jī)字體的使用范圍廣泛,使用頻率高,社會(huì)公眾日常的文字編輯和文檔打印都無(wú)法脫離計(jì)算機(jī)字體,它關(guān)系到公共利益的需求。雖然如此,但當(dāng)前我國(guó)的計(jì)算機(jī)字體產(chǎn)業(yè)面臨著發(fā)展困境,盜版字體泛濫,字體設(shè)計(jì)公司嚴(yán)重虧損,字體設(shè)計(jì)人才匱乏,字體生產(chǎn)能力和設(shè)計(jì)理念落后。筆者認(rèn)為在當(dāng)前這種情況下討論計(jì)算機(jī)字體的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題需要從著作權(quán)法的基本理論和我國(guó)目前的著作權(quán)司法政策兩方面入手,綜合考慮計(jì)算機(jī)字體的自身屬性、字體產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展和社會(huì)公眾的字體需求等。因此,本文主要分為以下六個(gè)部分:第一部分主要介紹兩起典型的計(jì)算機(jī)字體侵權(quán)案件,進(jìn)而引出計(jì)算機(jī)字體的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題。第二部分主要辨析基本的概念,由于計(jì)算機(jī)字體的具體概念比較混亂,所以筆者首先明確對(duì)計(jì)算機(jī)字體的界定以及其它相關(guān)概念的理解。第三部分主要從著作權(quán)法的基本理論方面探討計(jì)算機(jī)字體的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題,從實(shí)用藝術(shù)作品和獨(dú)創(chuàng)性兩個(gè)方面來(lái)進(jìn)行分析。運(yùn)用觀念上的可分離方法分析得出計(jì)算機(jī)字體的藝術(shù)性與實(shí)用性是可以實(shí)現(xiàn)觀念上的相分離,而分離之后的藝術(shù)性表達(dá)也是有可能滿足獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的要求,最終得出計(jì)算機(jī)字體是可以進(jìn)入到著作權(quán)法的保護(hù)范圍。第四部分主要從著作權(quán)制度的公共政策的屬性方面探討計(jì)算機(jī)字體的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題,某種作品最終能否得到著作權(quán)法的保護(hù)是該國(guó)著作權(quán)制度公共政策選擇的結(jié)果,計(jì)算機(jī)字體同樣如此,而字體產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展需要和社會(huì)公共利益的維護(hù)是計(jì)算機(jī)字體著作權(quán)保護(hù)主要考慮的政策因素。第五部分主要介紹國(guó)外關(guān)于字體的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定和司法實(shí)踐,從整體上來(lái)看,字體是可以受到著作權(quán)法保護(hù)的,但是各國(guó)也都依據(jù)本國(guó)的實(shí)際情況而有不同的規(guī)定。第六部分主要是為我國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)字體的保護(hù)提出一些法律建議,包括:計(jì)算機(jī)字體可以成為實(shí)用藝術(shù)作品,適當(dāng)提高計(jì)算機(jī)字體的獨(dú)創(chuàng)性認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),限定字體權(quán)利人的權(quán)利范圍等。
[Abstract]:After entering the digital era, Chinese characters in our country have also begun to enter the era of computer fonts, with certain development, but in the process of development, there are also some problems, among which the most noticeable is the copyright protection of computer fonts. With the emergence of a series of font infringement cases, the copyright protection of computer fonts has become a hot issue studied by experts and scholars. Compared with common works, computer font has its own particularity. Computer font not only has the practical function of transmitting information and exchanging emotion, but also presents a strong artistic color in some new fonts. It is a kind of works with both practicality and artistry. Nowadays, computer fonts are widely used and frequently used. The daily text editing and document printing of the public cannot be separated from computer fonts, which is related to the demand of public interest. However, at present, the computer font industry in our country is faced with the difficulties of development, such as the proliferation of pirated fonts, the serious loss of font design companies, the lack of talents in font design, and the backward production capacity and design concept of fonts. The author thinks that the discussion of the copyright protection of computer fonts under such circumstances should start with the basic theory of copyright law and the current copyright judicial policy of our country, and consider the attributes of computer fonts comprehensively. The development of font industry and the demand of the public. Therefore, this paper is divided into the following six parts: the first part mainly introduces two typical computer font infringement cases, and then leads to the copyright protection of computer fonts. The second part mainly discriminates the basic concept, because the concrete concept of the computer font is confused, so the author first clearly defines the computer font and other related concepts. The third part mainly discusses the copyright protection of computer fonts from the basic theory of copyright law and analyzes from the two aspects of practical works of art and originality. It is concluded that the artistic character and practicability of computer fonts can be separated from each other, and the artistic expression after separation is likely to meet the requirements of originality. Finally, it is concluded that computer fonts can enter the protection scope of copyright law. The fourth part mainly discusses the copyright protection of computer fonts from the attribute of the public policy of copyright system. Whether a certain work can be protected by copyright law is the result of the choice of public policy of copyright system in this country. The same is true of computer fonts, and the development of font industry and the maintenance of social public interest are the main policy factors for the copyright protection of computer fonts. The fifth part mainly introduces the relevant legal provisions and judicial practice of foreign countries on fonts. On the whole, fonts can be protected by copyright law, but different countries also have different provisions according to their actual situation. The sixth part mainly puts forward some legal suggestions for the protection of computer fonts in our country, including: computer fonts can become practical works of art, and the standard of originality identification of computer fonts should be improved appropriately. Limit the scope of the rights of the font owner, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 崔國(guó)斌;;單字字體和字庫(kù)軟件可能受著作權(quán)法保護(hù)[J];法學(xué);2011年07期

2 黃匯;鄭家紅;;論計(jì)算機(jī)字體單字著作權(quán)保護(hù)中的公共領(lǐng)域保留——以方正訴寶潔侵犯計(jì)算機(jī)倩體字“飄柔”案為例展開[J];法律適用;2013年04期

3 徐雨明;文雙春;;TrueType字形數(shù)據(jù)文件結(jié)構(gòu)的分析[J];衡陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

4 曹新明;鄭倫幸;;關(guān)于字體單字著作權(quán)問(wèn)題的思考[J];南京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

5 袁海英;馬驕;劉海燕;;論著作權(quán)法上作品的本質(zhì)屬性[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

6 史勤艷;;論作品獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];山東審判;2005年06期

7 吳漢東;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)本質(zhì)的多維度解讀[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年05期

8 奚曉明;;當(dāng)前我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)的政策與理念[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年03期

9 周栻川;;實(shí)用藝術(shù)品的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];中國(guó)專利與商標(biāo);2013年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1780449