本文選題：消費者權(quán)益保護法 + 立法不足��； 參考：《中國海洋大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：新修訂的《消費者權(quán)益保護法》已于2014年3月15日起實施。本次修訂與時俱進地加入有利于保護消費者權(quán)益的新制度,提升了消費者保護的水平。經(jīng)過實踐的證明,該法已經(jīng)在具體的運用中收到了較好的社會效果。但從更好的保護消費者合法權(quán)益的角度出發(fā),本法仍存在一些不足之處,為了使消費者的合法權(quán)益得以最大化的實現(xiàn),本文主要從四個部分進行論述。第一部分主要論述了《消費者權(quán)益保護法》的修訂背景和修訂歷程,并重點對全國人大常委會及全國人大法律委員會對該法的立法審議工作進行了總結(jié),從消費理念、消費結(jié)構(gòu)、消費方式的極大變化得出該法已經(jīng)遠遠落后于現(xiàn)實的需要,從而闡述了該法修訂的必要性和重要意義。并從該法頒布前的立法評估和審議工作得出該法在修訂程序上的嚴謹性和科學(xué)性,從而闡述了這項立法舉措大大的提高了立法的質(zhì)量和法律的可執(zhí)行性。第二部分主要論述了《消費者權(quán)益保護法》的立法進步及不足,具體來說,該法在解決消費者維權(quán)難、強化經(jīng)營者義務(wù)、加重違法經(jīng)營者責(zé)任等方面進行了較大幅度的修改,并增加了消費者后悔權(quán)、公益訴訟等新制度,體現(xiàn)出了的立法的進步之處。但該法的一些規(guī)定仍體現(xiàn)出了一定的立法不足,如后悔權(quán)的適用范圍過于狹窄、公益訴訟制度沒有規(guī)定具體的操作細則、舉證責(zé)任倒置期限較短等。該法的針對性和可操作性仍然有可提升的空間。第三部分從無理由退貨制度、網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供者責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任等相關(guān)法律規(guī)定分析了國外有關(guān)消費者權(quán)益保護的相關(guān)法律制度,選取了三個典型國家進行分析,對日本的無理由退貨制度、德國的舉證責(zé)任制度以及瑞典的冷靜期制度進行了重點介紹,從而論述了我國在消費者保護立法工作中值得借鑒的地方。第四部分根據(jù)我國《消費者權(quán)益保護法》在實踐中仍然存在的問題,結(jié)合我國的現(xiàn)狀和實際,并對國外有關(guān)消費者權(quán)益保護的相關(guān)立法進行研究,提出了從細化后悔權(quán)實施細則、加大懲罰性賠償力度、適當(dāng)授予某些機關(guān)或其他消費者組織和個人提起公益訴訟的資格等方面對《消費者權(quán)益保護法》加以完善的建議。
[Abstract]:The newly amended Consumer Rights and interests Protection Act came into effect on March 15, 2014.This revision keeps pace with the times to join the new system to protect the rights and interests of consumers, raising the level of consumer protection.It has been proved by practice that the method has got better social effect in concrete application.However, from the perspective of better protection of consumers' legitimate rights and interests, there are still some shortcomings in this law. In order to maximize the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, this paper mainly discusses from four parts.The first part mainly discusses the background and process of the revision of the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law, and summarizes the legislative review of the Law by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress and the Law Committee of the National people's Congress.The great changes in consumption structure and consumption mode show that the law has fallen far behind the needs of reality, and the necessity and significance of the revision of the law are expounded.And from the legislative evaluation and review work before the promulgation of the law, it is concluded that the revision procedure of the law is rigorous and scientific, thus the legislative measures greatly improve the quality of legislation and the law enforcement.The second part mainly discusses the legislative progress and shortcomings of the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law. Specifically, the law has been greatly modified in solving the problems of consumer rights protection, strengthening the obligations of operators, and increasing the liability of illegal operators.And added consumer regret right, public interest litigation and other new system, reflected the legislative progress.However, some provisions of the law still reflect some legislative deficiencies, such as the narrow scope of application of the right of regret, the absence of specific operational rules in the system of public interest litigation, the short period of inversion of the burden of proof, and so on.There is still room for improvement in the pertinence and maneuverability of the law.The third part analyzes the relevant legal system of consumer rights and interests protection in foreign countries from the relevant legal provisions, such as unjustified return system, network trading platform provider's liability and burden of proof, and selects three typical countries to carry on the analysis.The system of unjustified return of goods in Japan, the system of burden of proof in Germany and the system of cooling-off period in Sweden are introduced in detail, and the points that our country can use for reference in the legislation of consumer protection are discussed.In the fourth part, according to the problems that still exist in the practice of the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law of our country, combined with the present situation and the reality of our country, the author studies the relevant legislation about the protection of consumer's rights and interests in foreign countries.Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the Consumer Rights Protection Law from the following aspects: the detailed rules of the implementation of the right of regret, the strengthening of punitive damages, and the appropriate granting of the qualifications of some organs or other consumer organizations and individuals to file public interest litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.8

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張秀欽;;“后悔權(quán)”至少是一根稻草[J];法制資訊;2009年06期

2 李麗;;淺論《消費者權(quán)益保護法》中后悔權(quán)的建立[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2009年08期

3 侯先鋒;;論后悔權(quán)制度實施的保障[J];阜陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期

4 周子凡;;消費者后悔權(quán)的冷思考[J];行政與法;2010年01期

5 韓平;侯先鋒;;試論“后悔權(quán)”設(shè)立之法學(xué)證成[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

6 彭斌;;理性看待消費者權(quán)益保護法中的后悔權(quán)制度[J];法制與社會;2010年23期

7 韓平;侯先鋒;;試論“后悔權(quán)”設(shè)立之法學(xué)證成[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

8 汪夏s，

本文編號：1761373