發(fā)布時間：2018-04-15 18:40

  本文選題：不動產(chǎn) + 交易安全��； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動涉及不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的權(quán)利人、買受人、第三人的利益和整個社會市場交易秩序的安全與穩(wěn)定。對不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動中各方利益主體的不同保障實(shí)則體現(xiàn)著法律對于不同利益主體之間利益調(diào)節(jié)與衡平,此過程涉及到利益主體之間的區(qū)別保障的價值取向,各國物權(quán)法中對不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度的選擇不僅是基于各自的立法偏好與價值取向,也是各國法律制定的背景不同。我國不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度的立法是借鑒大陸法系現(xiàn)有立法成果而來的,采取的是債權(quán)形式主義立法模式制度。本文以為,基于不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動關(guān)涉利益巨大、牽涉利益主體多樣,甚至對于整個市場交易法律秩序亦能造成深遠(yuǎn)影響,對不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度的研究應(yīng)當(dāng)脫離理論層面的羈絆,需要借助交易安全保障理論來審視不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度的選擇與完善。通過利用交易安全理論進(jìn)行分析可以發(fā)現(xiàn),我國現(xiàn)有的不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度存在一物二賣下的安全保障缺陷、登記公信力制度不完善、不動產(chǎn)善意取得制度不完備等問題�；诮灰装踩Ｕ系膬r值考量,本文提出要完善不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動的登記公信力制度、強(qiáng)化不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)登記公信力、完善不動產(chǎn)善意取得制度,應(yīng)當(dāng)由立法明文確立不動產(chǎn)登記公信力制度,并在此基礎(chǔ)上完善不動產(chǎn)善意取得制度,并在立法層面進(jìn)一步確立物權(quán)行為理論,以保障交易安全。全文內(nèi)容安排依次如下：第一部分為引言,通過具體案例分析指出我國不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度存在的問題,即不動產(chǎn)登記公示公信制度以及不動產(chǎn)善意取得制度的不足,由此損害了交易安全,并基于交易安全為視角對其進(jìn)行制度完善。第二部分闡述不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動與交易安全理論的基本內(nèi)容,尤其是詳細(xì)分析交易安全理論法理基礎(chǔ),并以此為分析視角闡釋不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動對于交易安全之影響的表現(xiàn)。第三部分具體分析我國不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度的立法概況和存在問題,通過對現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定的具體闡釋指出我國不動物權(quán)變動存在交易安全保障不足、不動產(chǎn)登記公示公信制度不完善、不動產(chǎn)善意取得制度不完備等主要問題。第四部分介紹了大陸法系不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度的立法概況以及對于我國的啟示,通過對典型國家不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度的立法考察得出其對于我國不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度完善的啟示,尤其是德國民法中物權(quán)行為制度在保障交易安全方面的巨大意義。第五部分是針對我國不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度存在的諸多問題所構(gòu)建的完善建議和措施,結(jié)合對于安全交易理論之發(fā)揮和市場交易安全價值的選取,提出在現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)范前提下,保持形式主義立法制度不變,進(jìn)一步完善交易安全的保障、不動產(chǎn)登記公示公信制度的完善、不動產(chǎn)善意取得制度的完備以及建立物權(quán)行為制度的立法設(shè)想,以此實(shí)現(xiàn)安全交易對不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度選擇的法理耦合。第六部分為本文結(jié)語,總結(jié)交易安全保障視角下我國不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動制度的構(gòu)建。
[Abstract]:Real property related to real property rights, the buyer, the security and stability of the interests of the third party and the whole society. The market order of different stakeholders protecting real estate property changes actually embodies the law for different stakeholders interest adjustment and balance, this process involves the value orientation of the difference between security interests, property law in all countries on the alteration of the real right system is not only the respective legislation preference and value orientation based on different countries is also the law of our country. The background of the alteration of real right legislation is the continental law and the existing legislation results. Take the formalism of creditor's rights legislation mode. This dissertation thinks that the real estate property change great concerned with the interests of stakeholders involved based on diversity, even for the entire market trading law Rank The order can also have a far-reaching impact on the level, should be from the fetters of theory on real right alternation systems, and improve transaction security with the need to examine the theory of alteration of real right. The choice of the system that can be analyzed by using the theory of transaction security, there is security defect of a product sold to two in China under the the alteration of the real right system, registration system is not perfect, the bona fide acquisition system is not complete. Based on the value of transaction security, this paper proposes to improve the registration system of real estate property change credibility, strengthen the real property registration credibility, perfect the bona fide acquisition of real estate shall be made by the law to establish real estate registration system, and on the basis of perfecting the bona fide acquisition of real estate, and in the legislative level to further establish the real right theory, In order to guarantee the safety of transactions. The content of this paper is arranged as follows: the first part is the introduction, through the analysis of the specific case pointed out that China's real estate property change existing system, real estate registration and real estate bona fide acquisition, thus damage the safety of trade, and based on the perspective of transaction security the perfection of the system. The second part describes the basic content of real estate property change and transaction security theory, especially the detailed analysis of the transaction security theory and on the basis of jurisprudence, analysis the perspective of real estate real right change for the security of transaction performance. The third part analyzes the legislative situation of China's real estate property the system changes and problems, through the specific interpretation of the existing legal provisions that no animal rights in China changes insufficient transaction security, real estate registration publicity. Credit system is not perfect, the bona fide acquisition of real estate is not complete and other major problems. The fourth part introduces the legislation of the civil law real estate property change system and for China, based on the typical countries of the alteration of real right system of legislation for the investigation concluded that China's real estate property change enlightenment to perfect the system, especially the property act in the German civil law system of great significance in ensuring the safety of the trade. The fifth part is to improve our real problems of property right system of the change of the recommendations and measures, combined with the selected value theory and play safe trading market transaction security, proposed in the current the legal norms under the premise of keeping formalism legislative system unchanged, further improve the transaction security, the perfect real estate registration, real property acquired in good faith system The sixth part is the conclusion of this paper, concluding the construction of the system of real right alteration in China from the perspective of transaction security.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李青;;日耳曼法“以手護(hù)手”原則研究[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

2 劉浩宇;物權(quán)行為無因性與交易安全之保障[J];東北師大學(xué)報;2000年02期

3 于宏偉;物權(quán)變動模式之選擇與交易安全[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年06期

4 于海涌;;法國不動產(chǎn)登記對抗主義中的利益平衡——兼論我國物權(quán)立法中不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動模式之選擇[J];法學(xué);2006年02期

5 田士永;;《物權(quán)法》中物權(quán)行為理論之辨析[J];法學(xué);2008年12期

6 李自恩;;三種物權(quán)變動模式淺析[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年09期

7 邱玉成;;淺談我國物權(quán)變動模式——以善意取得與無權(quán)處分的關(guān)系為視角[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年12期

8 常鵬翱;;論現(xiàn)實(shí)存在與物權(quán)行為的無關(guān)聯(lián)性——對相關(guān)學(xué)理爭辯的再辨析[J];法學(xué);2015年01期

9 吳一鳴;;契據(jù)交付:英美法中的“物權(quán)行為”——?dú)v史的巧合還是生活的必然?[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;2010年02期

10 鐘維;;論物權(quán)變動區(qū)分原則在無權(quán)處分領(lǐng)域之貫徹[J];人大法律評論;2009年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊海涌;論交付在不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動中的法律效力[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2005年

2 黃慧;物權(quán)變動模式研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1755309