本文選題：未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任　切入點(diǎn)：責(zé)任形態(tài)　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以作為特殊侵權(quán)責(zé)任之一的未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任為探討和研究對(duì)象，先從未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任的概述入手，分析了未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任的基本概念、性質(zhì)和歷史發(fā)展，接著選取筆者認(rèn)為最值得研究的未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任的責(zé)任形態(tài)和歸責(zé)原則兩個(gè)方面作為重點(diǎn)論證內(nèi)容，通過(guò)比較法的考察及對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法的評(píng)析。指出我國(guó)立法的不足及域外立法例的科學(xué)之處，進(jìn)而主張應(yīng)該借鑒先進(jìn)的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)，完善我國(guó)的未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任立法。在論述中，本文采取了比較和邏輯分析及社會(huì)學(xué)分析的研究方法。全文共有四個(gè)部分： 第—部分：未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任概述。在這一部分中，文章首先對(duì)未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任的概念進(jìn)行了界定，指出本文所要探討的未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任是指無(wú)民事行為能力和限制民事行為能力的未成年人因自己的行為造成他人損害而由自己或其監(jiān)護(hù)人承擔(dān)的責(zé)任。緊接著對(duì)未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行了探討，在梳理學(xué)界的不同觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上，提出就我國(guó)《民法通則》的立法規(guī)定來(lái)看，應(yīng)該把未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)人對(duì)外承擔(dān)責(zé)任的性質(zhì)界定自己責(zé)任。本部分還描述了未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任的緣起和歷史發(fā)展。通過(guò)對(duì)其歷史發(fā)展的描述，指出了未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任立法的兩個(gè)發(fā)展方向，即未成年人父母或監(jiān)護(hù)人承擔(dān)責(zé)任理論基礎(chǔ)的變化和未成年人自己責(zé)任原則的確認(rèn)。 第二部分：未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)研究。該部分首先分析了侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)的概念，認(rèn)為應(yīng)該用這一工具來(lái)分析未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任。隨后，對(duì)未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)的決定因素——未成年人的侵權(quán)責(zé)任能力進(jìn)行介紹，，認(rèn)為是否承認(rèn)未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任能力是確定侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)的前提。隨后，論文對(duì)未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)進(jìn)行了比較法的考察，通過(guò)對(duì)域外立法例和我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法的介紹和梳理，指出基于對(duì)特定范圍的未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任能力的肯定，大陸法和英美法國(guó)家都確定了該侵權(quán)責(zé)任的多種責(zé)任形態(tài)，其中以德國(guó)和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣民法典最為具體和科學(xué)，即在該侵權(quán)責(zé)任的形態(tài)上既有未成年人的單獨(dú)責(zé)任、未成年監(jiān)督義務(wù)人的單獨(dú)責(zé)任，還包括未成年人和監(jiān)督義務(wù)人的連帶責(zé)任和未成年人的衡平責(zé)任。而我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法基于未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任能力否認(rèn)主義，只有監(jiān)護(hù)人單獨(dú)責(zé)任一種責(zé)任形態(tài)。 第三部分：未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則研究。首先提出了歸責(zé)原則的概念，緊接著指出由于未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)的復(fù)雜性，本部分主要研究
[Abstract]:This article takes the minor tort liability as one of the special tort liability as the research object, starts with the summary of the minor tort liability, analyzes the basic concept, the nature and the historical development of the minor tort liability. Then the author chooses the responsibility form and liability principle of minor tort liability, which is the most worthy to be studied, as the emphatic proof content. Through the investigation of comparative law and the analysis of the current legislation of our country, the author points out the deficiency of our legislation and the science of the extraterritorial legislation, and then advocates that we should learn from the advanced legislative experience. In this paper, the author adopts comparative, logical and sociological analysis methods. There are four parts in this paper:. In this part, the article defines the concept of tort liability of minors. It is pointed out that the liability of minor torts, which is discussed in this paper, refers to the liability of a minor who has no capacity for civil action and limits his capacity for civil conduct to be assumed by himself or his guardian because of the damage caused by his own act to others. This paper discusses the nature of tort liability of minors, On the basis of combing the different viewpoints of the academic circles, it is proposed that the legislative provisions of the General principles of Civil Law in China should be viewed. This part also describes the origin and historical development of juvenile tort liability. This paper points out two development directions of the legislation of minor's tort liability, that is, the change of the theoretical basis of the minor's parent or guardian's responsibility and the confirmation of the minor's own responsibility principle. The second part: the study on the form of tort liability of minors. This part first analyzes the concept of tort liability form, and thinks that we should use this tool to analyze the tort liability of minors. This paper introduces the decisive factor of the form of tort liability of minors-the ability of tort liability of minors, and thinks that whether or not to recognize the capacity of tort liability of minors is the premise of determining the form of tort liability. This paper makes a comparative study on the form of tort liability of minors, and points out that it is based on the affirmation of the capacity of tort liability of minors in a specific scope by introducing and combing the extraterritorial legislation and the current legislation of our country. Both the civil law and the Anglo-American law countries have determined the various liability forms of the tort liability, in which Germany and Taiwan Civil Code are the most specific and scientific, that is, the individual liability of minors exists in the form of tort liability. The individual liability of minor supervisory obligor also includes the joint and several liability of minor and supervision obligor and the equal liability of minor. Only a guardian alone is responsible for a form of responsibility. The third part: the research on the principle of liability attribution of minor tort liability. Firstly, the concept of liability imputation principle is put forward, and then it is pointed out that due to the complexity of the form of tort liability of minors, this part mainly studies
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李好;我國(guó)未成年人侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度之研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

2 項(xiàng)寅;監(jiān)護(hù)人侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：1674988