本文選題：建設工程合同　切入點：合同無效　出處：《遼寧大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國是建筑業(yè)大國,作為國民經(jīng)濟基礎(chǔ)產(chǎn)業(yè),建筑業(yè)的地位舉足輕重。伴隨建筑行業(yè)的蓬勃發(fā)展,建設工程領(lǐng)域的相關(guān)法律問題也隨之不斷增多。同時,由于建設工程具有資金投入大、施工周期長、專業(yè)技術(shù)復雜、涉及內(nèi)容廣等特點,我國針對建設工程合同的訂立程序、合同當事人的資格審查、合同實際履行以及糾紛化解機制等多方面進行統(tǒng)一協(xié)調(diào)。不但完善了相關(guān)立法,并進一步進行了不同執(zhí)法層面的嚴格執(zhí)法、建筑市場秩序的規(guī)范。雖然如此,但現(xiàn)在的司法實際情況是,受制于我國現(xiàn)今的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展情況及法律體系、立法現(xiàn)狀的不完善,一個建設工程項目,從立項審批、招投標程序、正式合同的簽訂、合同的備案、合同實際履行、竣工驗收等環(huán)節(jié),頻繁出現(xiàn)違法違規(guī)行為。如惡性競標、訂立黑白合同、不具備資質(zhì)的施工人違法承包、非法轉(zhuǎn)包、違法分包等。正因為這些亂現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn),才導致建設工程合同的效力面臨多種問題亟待解決。對目前比較常見的建設工程合同,現(xiàn)行的法律法規(guī)及司法解釋對此均有明確的規(guī)定。但因我國建筑市場上違法行為眾多,已存在的法律法規(guī)及司法解釋遠遠不能滿足司法實務的需要。同時,在某些情況下,認定建設工程合同無效在理論界也存在爭議,使得審判人員在處理涉及建設工程合同無效及后果的相關(guān)案件中,遇到很多障礙。本文通過兩個案例的引入,以建設工程合同無效的焦點作為切入點,探究建設工程合同無效的主要情形、特殊的合同無效情況(如黑白合同)以及無效后的法律后果。筆者查閱了與建設工程合同相關(guān)的,譬如《建筑法》《招標投標法》等法律法規(guī),在整理、分析、匯總已查閱資料的基礎(chǔ)上,對前述問題進行了深入的探析及反思。作為一名在法院工作的司法工作人員,筆者寫作本文目的是希望對有關(guān)建設工程合同無效的類型案件闡述理論和實踐的建議,以期對司法審判實務作出貢獻。
[Abstract]:China is a large country of construction industry, as the basic industry of national economy, the position of construction industry is very important. With the vigorous development of construction industry, the related legal problems in the field of construction engineering are also increasing. At the same time, Because the construction project has the characteristics of large capital investment, long construction period, complex professional technology, wide content, etc., the conclusion procedure of the construction project contract and the qualification examination of the parties to the contract in our country, The actual performance of the contract and the dispute resolution mechanism have been unified and coordinated. Not only has the relevant legislation been perfected, but also the strict enforcement of the law at different levels of law enforcement and the norms of the order of the construction market have been carried out. Nevertheless, However, the actual situation of the current judicial system is that it is subject to the current economic development and legal system of our country, the imperfection of the current legislative situation, a construction project, examination and approval of a construction project, bidding procedures, the signing of a formal contract, and the filing of a contract. The actual performance of the contract, the completion and acceptance of the contract, and other links have frequently resulted in illegal and illegal activities, such as vicious bidding, conclusion of black-and-white contracts, illegal contracting, illegal subcontracting, illegal subcontracting by unqualified constructors, and so on. Precisely because of the emergence of these chaotic phenomena, As a result, the effectiveness of the construction contract faces many problems to be solved urgently. The current laws and regulations and judicial interpretations have clear provisions on the construction contracts, which are relatively common at present. However, there are many illegal acts in the construction market of our country. The existing laws and regulations and the judicial interpretation are far from meeting the needs of judicial practice. At the same time, in some cases, it is also disputed in the theoretical circle that the construction project contract is invalid. This makes the judges encounter many obstacles in dealing with the related cases involving the invalidity and consequences of the construction project contract. Through the introduction of two cases, this paper takes the focus of the construction project contract invalidation as the starting point. This paper probes into the main circumstances of the invalidity of the construction project contract, the special circumstances of the invalidation of the contract (such as black-and-white contract) and the legal consequences after the invalidation. For example, on the basis of sorting out, analyzing and summarizing the information already consulted, and other laws and regulations, such as the "Building Law" and the "bidding and bidding Law", the above problems have been deeply explored and reconsidered. As a judicial staff member working in the court, The purpose of this paper is to expound the theoretical and practical suggestions on the types of cases concerning the invalidation of construction contracts in order to make a contribution to the judicial practice.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 張繼承;;論建設工程合同規(guī)范定位的嬗變及完善[J];時代法學;2013年01期

2 董淳鍔;;法律規(guī)避下的契約私人治理研究——以建筑工程違法分包現(xiàn)象為切入點[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2011年02期

3 張新寶;王偉國;;最高人民法院民商事司法解釋溯及力問題探討[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2010年06期

4 袁軍;;淺談關(guān)于建設工程施工合同無效糾紛案件適用法律問題[J];法制與社會;2010年24期

5 徐國良;;無效施工合同處理的司法實務研究[J];福建論壇(社科教育版);2009年04期

6 王志工;;建設工程合同基本范疇芻議[J];法制與社會;2008年20期

7 彭賽紅;;合同法定形式效力的比較法分析[J];長沙大學學報;2008年03期

8 周澤;;建設工程“黑白合同”法律問題研究——兼對最高法院一條司法解釋的批評[J];中國青年政治學院學報;2006年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 張慧;李萌;;論建設工程施工合同項下實際施工人如何認定[A];第五屆西部律師發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2012年

2 馮增強;;談談無效施工合同[A];跨越發(fā)展：七省市第十屆建筑市場與招標投標優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2010年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前9條

1 梁慶華;論建設工程施工合同的無效及其處理[D];湘潭大學;2015年

2 楊杰;論建設工程施工合同無效后的工程價款問題[D];吉林大學;2015年

3 曹南;無效建設工程合同的認定及其法律后果[D];河南大學;2013年

4 王sケ，

本文編號：1665644