本文選題：個(gè)人信息控制者　切入點(diǎn)：違約責(zé)任　出處：《圖書(shū)情報(bào)工作》2015年02期

【摘要】：[目的/意義]建立個(gè)人信息控制者違約責(zé)任尤其是賠償責(zé)任機(jī)制,為個(gè)人信息資源保護(hù)立法及個(gè)人信息資源的規(guī)范合理收集使用提供有力的理論支持。[方法/過(guò)程]采用文獻(xiàn)分析法、實(shí)證分析法、經(jīng)濟(jì)分析法、系統(tǒng)分析法以及規(guī)范分析法等研究方法,以個(gè)人信息資源的權(quán)利屬性分析為基礎(chǔ),從個(gè)人信息收集使用行為的合同關(guān)系出發(fā),以個(gè)人信息控制者違約責(zé)任構(gòu)成、歸責(zé)原則和責(zé)任方式為突破口,界定違約賠償范圍,最終提出違約賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)解決方案。[結(jié)果/結(jié)論]通過(guò)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),個(gè)人信息資源具有典型的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)和人格權(quán)雙重屬性,個(gè)人信息收集和使用關(guān)系具有突出的合同屬性,個(gè)人信息資源財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)具有許可使用費(fèi)屬性;個(gè)人信息控制者違約賠償范圍包括精神損害賠償和財(cái)產(chǎn)損失賠償;賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)分為一般違約的補(bǔ)償性賠償和嚴(yán)重違約的懲罰性賠償,精神損害賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)當(dāng)財(cái)產(chǎn)化,財(cái)產(chǎn)損失補(bǔ)償性賠償?shù)臉?biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)為損失的全部;懲罰性賠償?shù)臉?biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)為補(bǔ)償性賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的3-5倍。本文提出的違約賠償責(zé)任范圍、賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等解決方案和方法具有較強(qiáng)的合理性和可操作性。
[Abstract]:[purpose / significance] establish mechanisms for the liability of personal information controllers for breach of contract, in particular liability, To provide strong theoretical support for the legislation of personal information resources protection and the rational collection and use of personal information resources. [methods / processes] the use of literature analysis, empirical analysis, economic analysis, Based on the analysis of the right attribute of personal information resources and the contractual relationship of personal information collection and using behavior, the systematic analysis and normative analysis are used to constitute the liability of personal information controller for breach of contract. The principle of imputation and the way of liability are the breakthrough point, the scope of compensation for breach of contract is defined, and the standard solution of compensation for breach of contract is put forward. [results / conclusion] through the research, it is found that personal information resources have typical dual attributes of property right and personality right. The relationship between personal information collection and use has prominent contractual attribute, the property right of personal information resource has the attribute of royalty, the scope of compensation for breach of contract by personal information controller includes compensation for moral damage and property loss. The standard of compensation should be divided into compensatory compensation for general breach of contract and punitive damages for serious breach of contract. The standard of compensation for mental damage should be property, and the standard for compensatory compensation for property loss should be the whole of loss. The standard of punitive damages should be 3-5 times of the standard of compensatory damages. The solutions and methods proposed in this paper, such as the scope of liability for breach of contract and the standard of compensation, have strong rationality and maneuverability.
【作者單位】： 華中科技大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1664535