本文選題：強制清污作業(yè)　切入點：民事責(zé)任　出處：《中國海洋大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版)》2015年02期

【摘要】：強制清污作業(yè)中,海事管理機構(gòu)的介入并不改變清污費用的民事責(zé)任性質(zhì)。將強制清污費用在性質(zhì)上視為民事責(zé)任,既符合我國油污損害賠償?shù)南嚓P(guān)立法規(guī)定及發(fā)展趨勢,也更有利于強制清污費用的有效償付。在強制清污費用的具體實現(xiàn)路徑上,鑒于《審理船舶油污案件規(guī)定》第11條較為抽象,除存在明顯的救助船舶及財產(chǎn)目的外,應(yīng)將強制清污費用視為預(yù)防措施費用。
[Abstract]:In compulsory decontamination operations, the intervention of maritime administrative agencies does not change the nature of civil liability for clean-up expenses. The nature of compulsory decontamination costs is regarded as civil liability, which conforms to the relevant legislative provisions and development trends of oil pollution damage compensation in China. It is also more conducive to the effective reimbursement of compulsory decontamination charges. In the specific path of realizing the compulsory decontamination costs, in view of the abstract nature of Article 11, except for the obvious purpose of salvaging the ship and property, The cost of compulsory decontamination shall be regarded as the cost of preventive measures.
【作者單位】： 北京工商大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科規(guī)劃基金項目《海洋行政體制改革的法律保障研究》(13BFX037) 北京工商大學(xué)青年基金項目《主管機關(guān)海難救助報酬請求權(quán)研究》(QNJJ2014-04)
【分類號】：D923
，

本文編號：1662320