發(fā)布時間：2018-03-18 05:20

  本文選題：高速公路經營者　切入點：高度危險活動區(qū)域　出處：《法學家》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：司法實踐中就行人非法進入高速公路受到傷害的案件在法律適用上存在較大分歧,高速公路經營者是否承擔責任、承擔責任的依據、歸責原則和具體計算均不一致。通過實證研究和理論分析可知,高速公路交通運輸屬于高度危險活動,但高速公路并非絕對就是高度危險活動區(qū)域;高度危險活動區(qū)域的認定應具有相對性,行人非法進入高速公路時高速公路才可被認定為高度危險活動區(qū)域,高速公路經營者才承擔高度危險責任,此時,高速公路經營者應承擔的是一種加重型過錯推定責任。此類事故中,高速公路經營者和肇事第三方應根據各自有無過錯、第三方客觀上能否給予賠償之不同,承擔按份責任或無追償權的不完全補充責任。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, there are great differences in the application of the law in the case of illegal pedestrian entering the expressway. Whether the expressway operator should bear the responsibility and the basis for the responsibility, The principle of imputation and concrete calculation are inconsistent. Through empirical research and theoretical analysis, it can be seen that highway traffic and transportation belong to highly dangerous activities, but expressway is not absolutely the area of highly dangerous activities. The identification of a highly dangerous activity area should be relative. Only when a pedestrian enters the expressway illegally can the expressway be recognized as a highly dangerous activity area, and the expressway operator bear the high hazard responsibility. In this kind of accident, the expressway operator and the third party of the accident should, according to whether they are at fault or not, be able to give compensation objectively. To assume partial liability or incomplete supplemental liability without recourse.
【作者單位】： 河海大學法學院;香港城市大學法律學院;
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 劉勇;;高速公路經營管理者的安全保障民事責任[J];山東審判;2007年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 馬瑩瑩;高速公路經營者安全保障義務研究[D];貴州民族大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1628183